Conciliar Sect’s Euthanasia Opposition Betrays Naturalist Foundations
Catholic News Agency reports (November 11, 2025): The Archdiocese of Mexico City through its publication Desde la fe opposes euthanasia legislation, warning it risks validating “totalitarian and eugenic ideologies.” The editorial condemns offering death to terminal patients as societal failure, advocating instead for expanded palliative care. While quoting activists and medical professionals opposing euthanasia, the conciliar structure warns against reducing healthcare costs through euthanasia and references “pope” Leo XIV’s call for November as suicide prevention month.
Anthropological Reductionism Masquerading as Defense of Life
The conciliar sect’s opposition centers on utilitarian arguments about human dignity rather than the immutable Catholic principle that euthanasia constitutes intrinsecus malum (intrinsically evil). Pius XII’s Allocution to Doctors (1957) explicitly condemned euthanasia as “murder” regardless of circumstances, declaring: “Nemo potest impune Dei iura in hominem violare” (No one can violate God’s rights over man with impunity). The Mexican pseudo-bishops reduce the crime to mere violation of “human rights,” adopting the very Enlightenment language condemned by Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832) as “absurd and erroneous maxims.”
Nowhere does the editorial reference:
The eternal salvation of souls endangered by euthanasia’s mortal sin
This omission proves the conciliar sect operates on naturalist presuppositions. As Pius XI taught in Quas Primas (1925), Christ’s social reign demands that nations “in teaching, in legislation, in the education of youth” obey divine law. The Mexican pseudo-hierarchy’s silence on eternal judgment reveals their immanentist theology – precisely the “cult of man” denounced in the Syllabus of Errors (Proposition 80).
Palliative Care as Pagan Substitute for Redemptive Suffering
The article promotes palliative care while omitting the supernatural purpose of suffering. St. Alphonsus Liguori’s The Great Means of Salvation teaches that suffering united to Christ’s Passion becomes meritorious for eternity. The conciliar sect’s medicalized approach reduces pain management to earthly comfort, ignoring St. Paul’s “Adimpleo ea quae desunt passionum Christi in carne mea” (I fill up in my flesh what is lacking in the sufferings of Christ – Col 1:24).
This naturalism permeates the “palliative care” cited by Dr. Luz Adriana Templos Esteban, who absurdly claims:
“What people want is not euthanasia; what they want is to not suffer”
Contrast this with St. Teresa of Avila’s maxim: “O patria, o patria! O dolor, o dolor!” (O homeland, o homeland! O suffering, o suffering!) demonstrating how saints desired suffering as means of purification. The conciliar sect’s therapeutic model constitutes practical atheism – offering morphine but denying Viaticum.
Totalitarian Echoes in Selective Quotations
The editorial’s warning about “totalitarian ideologies” rings hollow coming from structures implementing Vatican II’s religious liberty heresy. When Mexico’s revolutionary government persecuted Catholics in the 1920s, true shepherds like Blessed Miguel Pro proclaimed “Viva Cristo Rey!” before firing squads. Today’s conciliar collaborators denounce euthanasia while maintaining communion with Bergoglian antipopes who embrace pagan rituals.
Consider the hypocrisy:
“We urge the authorities…not to force notaries and doctors to act against their convictions”
This from the same conciliar sect that forced priests to celebrate Novus Ordo after 1969! The Mexican episcopate’s “conscientious objection” argument implicitly accepts moral relativism condemned by Pius IX: “Libertas conscientiae et cultus est proprium ius cujuslibet hominis” (Liberty of conscience and worship is each man’s personal right – Syllabus Proposition 15).
Leo XIV’s Suicide Prevention Ploy
The editorial’s reference to “pope” Leo XIV’s suicide prevention month constitutes blasphemous theater. True popes like St. Pius V excommunicated heretics (Regnans in Excelsis, 1570); antipopes host pagan idolatry in Vatican gardens. Bergoglio’s successor cannot coherently oppose suicide while promoting the “paradigm shift” of Amoris Laetitia permitting adulterers to receive “communion.”
As the Holy Office decreed in Lamentabili (1907):
Those who disregard condemnations of Roman Congregations are free from fault (Proposition 8)
The conciliar sect’s selective defense of life ignores its own complicity in abortion via COVID vaccine cooperation and environmentalist population control. Their euthanasia opposition serves only to maintain influence in dying neo-pagan societies, not convert nations to Christ the King.
Conclusion: Death Cult in Mercy’s Clothing
While quoting palliative care advocates, the article omits that Mexico’s conciliar churches routinely deny Last Rites to traditional Catholics. The “death with dignity” debate occurs entirely within the atheistic parameters of Christless humanitarianism. Where are the calls for national consecration to the Sacred Heart? Where the processions with the Blessed Sacrament to implore divine mercy?
The Mexican pseudo-bishops prove Pius X’s warning in Pascendi (1907): Modernists reduce religion to “vital immanence” – subjective experience devoid of dogma. Their euthanasia opposition accidentally confirms their own apostasy: having abandoned the depositum fidei, they can only protest euthanasia using secular bioethics.
True Catholics respond with St. Augustine: “Non est misericordia, nisi in veritate” (There is no mercy without truth). May God raise saints to teach Mexicans that suffering accepted with grace opens heaven’s gates – a truth eclipsed by conciliarism’s therapeutic despair.
Source:
Church in Mexico: Euthanasia can lead to ‘totalitarian and eugenic ideologies’ (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 11.11.2025