Vatican’s UN Appeasement Betrays Christ’s Kingship for Secular Compromise
Vatican’s UN Appeasement Betrays Christ’s Kingship for Secular Compromise
The Vatican News portal reports on November 14, 2025, that “Archbishop” Gabriele Caccia, serving as the Holy See’s Permanent Observer to the United Nations, reaffirmed support for a “two-state solution” between Israel and Palestine. He praised the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) as indispensable, condemned attacks on its facilities, and urged “patient dialogue” and “inclusive cooperation” while deploring violence. The article frames this as consistent with the “Holy See’s longstanding” position, omitting any reference to the Social Kingship of Christ or the duty of nations to submit to divine law. This diplomatic theater reduces the Church’s mission to a humanitarian NGO, tacitly endorsing the UN’s godless globalism.
Negation of Christ’s Social Kingship
The address commits the grave error of treating the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a purely political dispute solvable through “internationally recognised borders” and “multilateralism.” This contradicts Pope Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas (1925), which declared: “Nations will be happy and peaceful only when Christ is King.” The “two-state solution” implicitly accepts the legitimacy of secular states rejecting Christ’s authority, violating the Church’s immutable teaching that “all the prerogatives of royalty must be attributed to Christ as man” (Quas Primas, §14). By reducing peace to territorial negotiations, Caccia’s statement embodies the naturalism condemned in the Syllabus of Errors (1864): “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (Proposition 39).
UNRWA: Vehicle of Secular Subversion
“UNRWA continues to provide emergency relief and comprehensive humanitarian assistance… offering hope, protection and the possibility of a dignified life.”
This uncritical endorsement ignores UNRWA’s documented role in promoting anti-Israel curricula and perpetuating refugee status. More damningly, it substitutes Catholic charity—ordered toward the salvation of souls—with godless humanitarianism. Pius XI warned against such naturalism: “There can be no true peace… in a society which discards Christian principles” (Caritate Christi Compulsi, 1932). The article’s praise for UNRWA’s “neutrality” and “impartiality” adopts the very indifferentism Pius IX anathematized: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” (Syllabus, Proposition 16). True charity requires proclaiming Christ, not distributing bread while souls starve.
Moral Equivalence and Omission of Supernatural Justice
The statement “deplores the attacks on UNRWA facilities” creates false moral symmetry between Hamas’ terrorist infrastructure and Israel’s defensive actions. Silence on Palestinian rocket attacks from civilian areas—a war crime—reveals the Vatican’s post-conciliar bias against legitimate self-defense. Contrast this with St. Augustine’s Just War principles, which permit force to restore order. Worse, the speech ignores the eternal consequences of rejecting Christ, reducing “prayers for casualties” to sentimentalism devoid of prayer for conversion. As Pope Pius X decreed in Lamentabili (1907), modernist theology “substitutes divine revelation with human consciousness” (Proposition 22)—here manifested as valuing earthly life over eternal salvation.
Diplomatic Cowardice as Apostasy
Caccia’s call for “dialogue not force” sanctifies the conciliar revolution’s betrayal of Catholic integralism. When Palestinian leaders openly seek Israel’s destruction, diplomacy without conversion becomes complicity in evil. Pope Pius XII’s 1948 In Multiplicibus Curis demanded Jerusalem’s internationalization to protect Christian holy sites—a stance abandoned by Vatican II’s embrace of religious indifferentism. The article’s focus on “human rights” (a Masonic concept) instead of Christ’s rights over nations proves the post-conciliar sect’s capitulation to Enlightenment errors condemned by Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832).
Conclusion: From True Church to UN Lobbyist
This UN address exemplifies how the conciliar sect operates as a globalist NGO, not the Church founded by Christ. By endorsing UNRWA—an agency perpetuating anti-Semitism and refugee dependency—and reducing peace to political compromise, it denies the Kingship of Christ. The true Church proclaims with Pius XI: “He must reign in our wills… our hearts… our bodies” (Quas Primas, §33). Until nations submit to Christ the King, no “two-state solution” will bring peace—only the divine justice foretold in Psalm 2: “Kiss the Son, lest He be angry.”
Source:
Holy See reaffirms support for two-state solution and for UNRWA (vaticannews.va)
Date: 14.11.2025