Antipope’s Hollow Ethics: Technocratic Idolatry Masquerading as Healthcare Reform

Antipope’s Hollow Ethics: Technocratic Idolatry Masquerading as Healthcare Reform

Vatican News portal (November 17, 2025) reports that the usurper of the Apostolic See, Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), addressed participants of the 9th Seminar on Ethics in Health Management organized by the “Pontifical Academy for Life.” The article emphasizes his warnings about artificial intelligence potentially reducing patients “to objects, to data, to statistics” and calls for an ethical vision rooted in “human dignity” and “solidarity.” The text describes this as part of a “pilgrimage of hope” during the “Jubilee Year,” asserting that technological progress must remain subordinate to “human contact” and “the recognition of the concrete person.” This moralizing veneer conceals a radical anthropocentric apostasy.

Naturalistic Reduction of Healthcare Ethics

The address commits the fundamental error condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas: constructing social order while “removing Jesus Christ and His most holy law from public life”. Nowhere does the antipope mention:

  • The duty to honor Christ the King as ultimate healer (Ego Dominus sanator tuus – Ex 15:26)
  • The Church’s teaching on redemptive suffering (Col 1:24)
  • The necessity of sacraments for eternal health (James 5:14-15)

Instead, healthcare is reduced to a managerial challenge requiring better “tools” and “approaches” – precisely the naturalism condemned in propositions 56-60 of Pius IX’s Syllabus which denounce ethical systems divorced from divine sanction. When the usurper states “changing our gaze… as God looks”, he perverts theology by equating God’s perspective with utilitarian calculations about resource allocation.

Technocratic Idolatry in Sacramental Language

The article’s description of the seminar as a “pilgrimage of hope” constitutes blasphemous appropriation of sacred concepts. True pilgrimage requires:

“penance through the recognition of one’s sins and the desire to be purified by God’s mercy” (Catechism of St. Pius X, 1908)

not policy discussions about AI systems. By framing technological management in quasi-sacramental terms, the conciliar sect fulfills St. Pius X’s warning about Modernists making “the whole organism of the Church… an instrument whereby they communicate to others their faith” (Pascendi Dominici Gregis 39).

The usurper’s concern about patients becoming “data, statistics” rings hollow while his “Pontifical Academy” promotes:

  1. Vaccines developed using aborted fetal cell lines
  2. “End-of-life” protocols violating Casti Connubii‘s defense of natural death
  3. Collaboration with pro-abortion organizations under “common good” pretexts

Theological Vacuum of “Human Dignity”

When the article promotes “healthcare rooted in human dignity,” it employs the conciliar sect’s signature heresy – divorcing dignity from sanctifying grace. Pius XII condemned this exact error:

“The dignity of man is maintained only when he acknowledges his dependence on God… Those who wish to re-establish social order while neglecting this essential dependence are building on sand” (Radio Message, December 24, 1944)

The usurper’s call to avoid “reductionist logic” ironically promotes the ultimate reductionism: treating man as mere biological entity rather than viator destined for heaven or hell. His silence on:

  • Mortal sin’s spiritual lethality
  • Duty to refuse immoral treatments
  • Eternal consequences of euthanasia/abortion

exposes the bankruptcy of ethics detached from lex aeterna. This is not accidental omission but systemic apostasy – implementing the Modernist program described in Lamentabili (propositions 22, 25, 64) where dogmas become malleable “interpretations” subservient to temporal needs.

Pseudo-Magisterial Theater of the Absurd

The article’s reference to ALAMI’s seminar occurring “under the Pontifical Academy for Life” completes this travesty. This institution:

  • Promoted COVID vaccines violating the Fifth Commandment
  • Failed to denounce mandatory euthanasia protocols
  • Employs members advocating contraception

When “Archbishop” Vincenzo Paglia – who commissioned blasphemous homoerotic frescoes – presided over this academy, its moral bankruptcy became undeniable. That the usurper now uses this compromised structure to lecture on ethics proves the conciliar sect’s descent into self-parody.

Christocentric Medicine vs. Conciliar Anthropology

Authentic Catholic healthcare begins with Christ’s words: “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick; I came not to call the righteous, but sinners” (Mk 2:17). This requires:

  1. Hospitals as extensions of the Church’s healing mission (Council of Nicaea I, Canon 18)
  2. Medical protocols respecting natural law and supernatural destiny
  3. Explicit evangelization through care for body and soul

The article’s vision reduces medicine to technical problem-solving – precisely the materialism condemned in Pius XI’s Quadragesimo Anno (1931). By omitting the Crucified Physician while promoting AI ethics, the conciliar sect fulfills St. Paul’s warning about “doctrines of demons… having the appearance of godliness but denying its power” (2 Tim 3:5).

Source:
Pope: Safeguard human dignity as health systems integrate AI   (vaticannews.va)
Date: 17.11.2025