Synodal Apostasy: Vatican’s Radical Departure from Catholic Tradition

Vatican News portal reports (November 17, 2025) on the publication of interim reports from ten “Study Groups” established by Jorge Bergoglio (“Pope Francis”) in March 2024, now extended under antipope Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”). These groups address themes including digital evangelization, women’s roles, ecumenism, polygamy, liturgy reform, and episcopal selection processes. The final reports are to be submitted by December 31, 2025, with Cardinal Mario Grech overseeing the process.

Subversion of Divine Hierarchy Through Synodal Revolution

The very premise of a “Synod on Synodality” constitutes a fundamental rejection of the Church’s monarchical constitution established by Christ. As Pius XI declared in Quas Primas (1925): “The Church…is a perfect society…having within itself all the resources necessary for its maintenance and action” (n. 13). The attempt to transform the Church into a democratic body through “round tables” and lay consultations violates the lex divina (divine law) of apostolic authority. The article’s boast of “dialogue with ecumenical communities” (Taizé, Focolari) and “non-denominational Christian movements” confirms the abandonment of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus (no salvation outside the Church), condemned as heresy in Pope Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864, Propositions 16-18).

Women’s Ordination and the Satanic Seed of Female Diaconate

Study Group 5’s focus on “women’s participation in leadership” masks the heresy of female ordination. The report admits forwarding “all synodal contributions” on female diaconate to Bergoglio’s “Second Study Commission,” revealing the endgame: institutionalizing sacrilege. Pope Leo XIII infallibly declared in Apostolicae Curae (1896): “The Church has no authority to confer priestly ordination on women”. Saint Paul’s injunction “mulieres in ecclesiis taceant” (women must keep silent in church – 1 Cor 14:34) is discarded in favor of feminist ideologies. The claim that “clericalism and male chauvinism” are “critical tensions” inverts reality – the true crisis is the demonic infiltration seeking to destroy the sacerdotal character of Holy Orders.

Liturgical Abominations and the Desacralization of Worship

The newly formed “Group on Liturgy” proposes altering lectionaries to “highlight scriptural testimonies about women’s role in salvation history.” This Modernist manipulation seeks to replace the lex orandi with gender ideology, directly contravening Pius V’s Quo Primum (1570), which forbade altering the Missal’s text “now or forever.” The report’s silence on the propitiatory Sacrifice of the Mass exposes its naturalistic orientation – reducing liturgy to a “synodal assembly” rather than the actio Christi (action of Christ). Pius XII warned in Mediator Dei (1947) that such innovations “would render the Church…a slave of human society” (n. 63).

Ecumenism: The Suicide of Faith

Study Group 10’s work on “Eucharistic hospitality” for “interconfessional couples” constitutes formal cooperation with heresy. The Council of Trent anathematizes those who say “that communicants…are free to receive…under one kind” (Session XXI, Canon 1) – yet this apostate structure promotes sacrilegious communion with schismatics. The embrace of “revival movements” and “non-denominational communities” fulfills Pius XI’s prophecy in Mortalium Animos (1928): “A false Christianity…in which all…will unthinkably have compromised” (n. 10).

Episcopal Betrayal: Selecting Wolves as Shepherds

Study Group 7’s consultation with “an expert in executive personnel selection” to reform bishop appointments completes the Protestantization of hierarchy. The 1917 Code of Canon Law (Can. 329 §2) reserves episcopal nomination exclusively to the Roman Pontiff, yet this report advocates “greater involvement of local Churches” – codifying collegialist heresy condemned by Pius VI in Auctorem Fidei (1794). The absence of any mention of sacra doctrina (sacred doctrine) or moral orthodoxy in selection criteria confirms these are appointments of wolves, not shepherds.

Polygamy and the Destruction of Christian Marriage

The SECAM report’s “theological discernment on polygamy” spits upon Christ’s words: “What God has joined, let no man separate” (Mt 19:6). Pope Pius XI’s Casti Connubii (1930) defines monogamy as “taught by nature’s law…firmly established by divine authority” (n. 17). To suggest pastoral accommodation for polygamists is to deny the very concept of sacramental marriage – reducing it to pagan naturalism.

The Masonic Fingerprint: Digital Mission and Globalist Agenda

Study Group 3’s “mission in the digital environment” involving “1,618 digital missionaries” exposes the technocratic reduction of evangelization. Contrast this with Pius X’s condemnation in Pascendi (1907): “The Modernist…reduces faith to sentiment” (n. 8). The “Jubilee of Catholic Influencers” completes the betrayal – replacing sacramental economy with social media spectacle.

Source:
Synod: Interim reports of Study Groups published (vaticannews.va)
Date: 17.11.2025