Conciliar Sect’s Jubilee of Apostasy: A False Hope in the Shadow of Antichrist
VaticanNews portal reports on the events of 2025, centering on the death of Jorge Bergoglio (“Francis”), the conclave election of Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”), and their joint subversion of the Holy Year concept through naturalistic spectacles masquerading as spiritual exercises. The article breathlessly describes over 30 million pilgrims attending modernist ceremonies, two antipopes manipulating the faithful, and ecumenical betrayals culminating in Prevost’s blasphemous invocation of “disarming peace” while embracing heretical leaders. This theatrical production concludes with Bergoglio’s burial at Santa Maria Maggiore – a sacrilegious desecration of a Marian basilica – and Prevost’s Nicaea commemoration that substitutes pagan interfaith dialogue for Catholic dogma.
Naturalistic Jubilee: The Cult of Man Replaces Divine Worship
The portal’s gushing account of “30 million pilgrims” attending jubilee events omits the essential distinction between Catholic piety and conciliar spectacle. True pilgrimage requires sacramental confession, Eucharistic adoration, and the mens ecclesiae (mind of the Church) – all absent in these gatherings centered on human achievement rather than divine transcendence. Pius XI’s Quas Primas explicitly condemns such naturalism: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony” (n.19). The “Jubilee of Hope” constitutes apostasy by implying humanity’s redemption depends on geopolitical negotiation rather than the Blood of Christ shed in the immaculata Hostia (immaculate Host).
Bergoglio’s final blasphemy – “Thank you for bringing me back to the Square” – perfectly encapsulates the sect’s inversion of priorities: the people’s applause replaces God’s judgment. His hospital selfie wearing purple vestments parodies the sagum militiae Christi (cloak of Christ’s soldiery), reducing sacramental dignity to media spectacle. The appointment of female “prefects” completes this anti-hierarchy, directly violating Pope Leo XIII’s Satis Cognitum: “The Church has always inherited…the office assigned to the apostles to be performed by an order of bishops” (n.13).
Illegitimate Usurpers Governing Through Invalid Rites
The conclave’s theatrical legitimacy hinges on the false premise that the conciliar sect possesses apostolic succession. St. Robert Bellarmine’s De Romano Pontifice decimates this notion: “A manifest heretic is ipso facto deposed from papal office” (II.30). Bergoglio’s public heresies – from Amoris Laetitia to the Abu Dhabi Declaration – rendered all subsequent acts null, including the creation of cardinals. Prevost’s election by heretical “cardinals” constitutes canonical nonsense, as Pope Paul IV’s Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio declares: “Any promotion to the cardinalate…shall be null, void and worthless” if the elector previously defected from faith (n.6).
Prevost’s Peruvian missionary work – praised by the portal – actually spread the heresies of liberation theology condemned by Pius XI in Divini Redemptoris as “false mysticism” (n.17). His choice of “Leo XIV” compounds the insult, parodying Leo XIII’s social doctrine while implementing its diametric opposite: globalist disarmament replacing Catholic sovereignty, interfaith syncretism supplanting extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Ecumenical Apostasy: From Nicaea to Babel
The article’s climax – Prevost’s Turkish “apostolic journey” commemorating Nicaea – constitutes sacrilege against the council that defined Christ’s divinity. When Prevost stands “on the shores of the lake” with Bartholomew I, he betrays the 318 Fathers who anathematized Arianism. St. Athanasius’ words condemn this treason: “Even if the faithful were reduced to a handful, these alone would be the true Church” (History of the Arians, n.26). The portal’s celebration of “prayer with leaders of other religions” in Lebanon fulfills Pius IX’s Syllabus condemnation: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which…he shall consider true” (Error 15).
Counterfeit Saints for a Counterfeit Church
The canonizations of Carlo Acutis and Pier Giorgio Frassati – postponed by Bergoglio’s death but enacted by Prevost – complete the sect’s diabolical parody. Post-1958 “canonizations” lack all validity, as Pope Benedict XIV established in De Servorum Dei Beatificatione that saints require fama sanctitatis (reputation for holiness) confirmed by miracles through Catholic intercession – impossible when the “pope” himself professes heresy. Acutis’ alleged Eucharistic miracles constitute psychological manipulation, while Frassati’s social activism replaces agere contra (acting against sin) with Marxist class struggle.
The portal’s rhapsody over “one million young people” at Tor Vergata confirms the sect’s abandonment of Catholic asceticism. Contrast this with St. Pius X’s warning: “The greatest enemy of the Church is not sin, but the illusion that one can love God without hating sin” (Haerent Animo, n.23). Prevost’s “disappear so Christ may remain” rhetoric inverts reality: by disappearing Catholic doctrine, only the Antichrist remains.
As the conciliar sect prepares to “close the Holy Door” on January 6, traditional Catholics recognize this ritual’s emptiness. The true Holy Door remains eternally open through the Immaculate Heart’s triumph – a triumph impossible through Bergoglio’s “brotherhood” or Prevost’s “peace“, but only by fulfilling Our Lady of La Salette’s demands ignored by both antipopes: “Penance, penance, penance!”
Source:
Jubilee 2025: A look back at the year (vaticannews.va)
Date: 31.12.2025