The Canary Islands Migrant Story: A Tool for the Conciliar Sect’s Political Agenda
VaticanNews portal reports on Ousseynou Fall, a Senegalese migrant who survived a shipwreck in 2020, losing his brother at sea, and who will welcome the antipope Leo XIV during his visit to the Canary Islands on June 11, 2026. The article presents this as a fulfillment of the previous antipope Francis’ uncompleted wish to visit migration hotspots, framing the encounter as a moment of “comfort” and solidarity with migrants. The piece highlights Ousseynou’s integration into Spanish society, his adoption by a local family, and his work as a chef, while quoting his request that the antipope “help us do more for migrants who die along the way.” This narrative, however, is not merely a human interest story but a carefully orchestrated piece of propaganda for the conciliar sect’s ideological agenda, exploiting genuine human suffering to advance a modernist vision of the Church’s mission that is fundamentally at odds with Catholic doctrine.
The Exploitation of Suffering for a Political Narrative
The article presents Ousseynou Fall’s harrowing experience—the death of his brother, the perilous crossing, the overcrowded conditions at the port of Arguineguín—as a backdrop for the antipope’s visit. While the suffering is real and deserving of compassion, the conciliar sect instrumentalizes it to promote its own ideological priorities. The focus is not on the spiritual needs of the migrants—their salvation, their need for conversion, their reception of the sacraments—but on their “dignity” and “integration” into secular society. This is a naturalistic reduction of the Church’s mission, which is primarily supernatural: to lead souls to eternal salvation through faith in Jesus Christ and the sacraments of the true Church.
The article quotes Ousseynou’s request: “If I could speak with the Pope, the first thing I would ask is that he help us do more for migrants who die along the way.” This plea, while understandable from a human perspective, is framed in purely temporal terms. There is no mention of the need for prayers for the dead, for the sacrament of baptism for those who die without it, for the true faith that alone can save. The conciliar sect’s response to such tragedies is not the supernatural remedy of the Gospel but the naturalistic remedy of “help” and “solidarity,” which, without faith, is ultimately futile.
The Omission of the Supernatural: A Grave Silence
The most glaring omission in this article is any reference to the spiritual dimension of migration. The Catholic Church has always taught that the primary concern for any human being is the salvation of their souls. The Catechism of the Council of Trent states that the Church is “the pillar and ground of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15), and her mission is to teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost (Matt. 28:19). Yet, in this entire narrative, there is not a single mention of the need for evangelization, for the conversion of these migrants to the Catholic faith, for their reception into the true Church.
This silence is not accidental; it is symptomatic of the modernist apostasy that has infected the conciliar sect since the Second Vatican Council. The encyclical *Quas Primas* of Pius XI teaches that the reign of Christ the King extends over all nations and all peoples, and that the Church has the duty and the right to teach, govern, and lead all to eternal happiness. The conciliar sect, however, has abandoned this mission in favor of a naturalistic humanism that seeks to “integrate” migrants into secular society rather than convert them to the true faith. This is a betrayal of the Church’s divine mandate.
The Conciliar Sect’s False Compassion
The article highlights the “warm welcome” Ousseynou received from a local family, Fermina and Cristobál, and the support of a local assistance group and the parish of Arguineguín. While these acts of charity are commendable, they are presented as the primary response to the migration crisis, overshadowing the need for spiritual care. The conciliar sect’s “compassion” is a false compassion that stops at temporal relief and ignores the eternal destiny of souls.
Pius XI, in *Quas Primas*, warned against the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors,” which seeks to remove Christ and His law from public life. The concilar sect’s approach to migration is a manifestation of this secularism, as it focuses on “integration” and “dignity” without reference to the supernatural order. The true compassion of the Church would be to offer these migrants not only temporal assistance but also the means of salvation: the sacraments, the true Mass, and the unchanging doctrine of the Catholic faith.
The Antipope’s Visit: A Stage for Modernist Propaganda
The visit of the antipope Leo XIV to the Canary Islands is presented as a fulfillment of the previous antipope Francis’ wish to visit migration hotspots. This continuity between the two antipopes underscores the conciliar sect’s commitment to its modernist agenda. The visit is not a pastoral mission to bring the true faith to the migrants but a political event designed to showcase the sect’s “concern” for migrants and to promote its vision of a “welcoming” Church.
The article describes the port of Arguineguín as “el muelle de la vergüenza—’the pier of shame’—because of the overcrowding and precarious conditions in which thousands of migrants were forced to live.” While these conditions are indeed deplorable, the concilar sect’s response is not to address the root causes of migration—such as the lack of faith and moral order in the migrants’ home countries—but to call for more “help” and “solidarity” within the framework of the secular world order. This is a far cry from the Church’s traditional teaching on the need for just governance, the protection of the family, and the promotion of the common good in accordance with God’s law.
The Duty of the True Church
The true Church, faithful to her divine mission, would approach the migration crisis with a supernatural perspective. She would seek to evangelize the migrants, bringing them the light of the true faith and the grace of the sacraments. She would also work to address the temporal conditions that drive migration, but always in the context of the spiritual good of souls. As Pius XI taught in *Quas Primas*, the reign of Christ the King encompasses all aspects of human life, both spiritual and temporal, and the Church must not abdicate her responsibility to govern and teach in all matters that affect the salvation of souls.
The conciliar sect, however, has abandoned this mission in favor of a naturalistic humanism that is indistinguishable from the secular world’s approach to migration. This is a grave betrayal of the Church’s divine mandate and a scandal to the faithful who remain true to the unchanging Catholic faith.
Source:
'Now I wait for Pope Leo,' says the Canary Islands migrant who moved Pope Francis (vaticannews.va)
Date: 04.06.2026