Conciliar Sect’s Judicial Farce: The Rupnik Cover-Up Under Antipope Leo XIV
The National Catholic Register portal, via its CNA/EWTN News service, reports that the Vatican press office, through its director Matteo Bruni, has denied rumors of an acquittal for “Father” Marko Rupnik, stating the “canonical criminal trial” remains open and confidential. The “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith,” headed by “Cardinal” Víctor Manuel Fernández, oversees proceedings reopened by antipope Francis after an initial dismissal based on the statute of limitations. The “Jesuits” admit Rupnik was “excommunicated” in 2020 for absolving a sexual partner, a penalty swiftly lifted. Nine women allege psychological, spiritual, and sexual abuse in 1990s Slovenia. Attorney Laura Sgrò expresses frustration at the secrecy; antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) demands “patience” and “respect for the rights of all people.” This simulacrum of justice exposes the conciliar sect’s institutional rot: a counterfeit judiciary, wielding a false code, protecting its own predators under the guise of canonical procedure.
The Nullity of the Conciliar “Judiciary”: No Jurisdiction, No Law, No Justice
The very notion of a “canonical criminal trial” within the structures occupying the Vatican is a juridical impossibility. As Pope Pius IX infallibly taught in the Syllabus of Errors (1864), the Church is “a true and perfect society, entirely free… endowed with proper and perpetual rights of her own, conferred upon her by her Divine Founder” (Error 19). The conciliar sect, having defected from the Catholic Faith through the heresies of Vatican II (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality), has lost the very jurisdiction it pretends to exercise. St. Robert Bellarmine, cited in the Defense of Sedevacantism, establishes that “a manifest heretic… by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head… just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” Since the line of usurpers beginning with John XXIII are manifesti haeretici, they possess zero authority to bind or loose, to judge or absolve. Their “Code of Canon Law” (1983) is a revolutionary statute crafted by Modernists to dismantle the Church’s coercive power over error and sin. Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code — “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric publicly defects from the Catholic faith” — applies a fortiori to the entire hierarchy of the neo-church. Their “tribunal” is a kangaroo court staged for the cameras of EWTN and the Register, a theatrum mundi to deceive the faithful into believing the abomination of desolation still possesses the potestas iurisdictionis.
The Antipope’s “Waiver” of Statute of Limitations: An Act of Usurped Authority
The article notes the “statute of limitations for the alleged offenses was waived” by antipope Francis. This single act condemns the entire proceeding. Only a true Pope possesses the plenitudo potestatis to dispense from ecclesiastical laws. As Pope Paul IV defined in Cum ex Apostolatus Officio (1559), if a “Roman Pontiff… has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” The “waiver” issued by Bergoglio — a public adherent of religious liberty and false ecumenism, hence a manifestus haereticus — carries no more canonical weight than the decree of a layman. It is irritum et inane. The “Dicastery” initially dismissing the case due to prescription, then “reopening” it on the antipope’s whim, reveals the arbitrary, positivist nature of their “law.” Law in the Church is not the will of the sovereign; it is the Lex Divina and the Lex Ecclesiastica rooted in Tradition. The conciliar sect treats canon law as positive legislation subject to the whim of the “pope” — the very essence of the Modernist error condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 58: “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him”). This “waiver” is not an act of justice; it is a press release designed to manage the public relations catastrophe of the Rupnik affair.
The “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith”: Guardian of Modernist Impunity
The “Dicastery,” headed by “Cardinal” Fernández — a notorious proponent of sacramental adultery and Amoris Laetitia heresies — is the fox guarding the henhouse. The article states the Dicastery “asked the Society of Jesus to investigate the allegations using an external investigator, who was a Dominican religious.” This is institutional incest. The Jesuits investigate the Jesuits; the Dominicans investigate the Jesuits; the Dicastery oversees the Jesuits. All are organs of the same apostate body. There is no independence, no judex naturalis, no separation of powers — only the monolithic will of the paramasonic structure. The Syllabus condemns the error that “The Church has not the power of defining dogmatically that the religion of the Catholic Church is the only true religion” (Error 21). The neo-church, having abandoned the definition of the Faith, cannot protect the faithful from wolves. The “external investigator” is a fig leaf. The Defense of Sedevacantism recalls Pope Celestine I regarding Nestorius: “he could not remove anyone by sentence who himself had already shown that he must be removed.” The “Cardinal” Fernández, by his public heresies, has already removed himself. His “judgment” on Rupnik is canonically non-existent.
The Jesuit Complicity: A Corrupted Order Protecting Its Own
The Society of Jesus, once the Societas Iesu, has been the vanguard of the Modernist revolution since the 1960s. The article admits the Jesuits “acknowledged that Father Rupnik had been excommunicated in 2020 for absolving a woman with whom he had engaged in sexual activity. The Jesuits said he repented and that the penalty was lifted shortly afterward.” This is a simulation of penance and absolution. Canon 1367 §1 (1917 Code) imposes latae sententiae excommunication for “absolving a partner in sin against the sixth commandment.” The lifting of such a censure requires true repentance, reparation of scandal, and the judgment of a legitimate superior. None of these exist here. The “repentance” was likely a formalistic declaration to restore a prized asset — Rupnik, the “artist” of the neo-church’s ugly churches. The “lifting” by the Jesuit “Superior General” (a Modernist appointee) is invalid. The False Fatima Apparitions document correctly identifies the “Masonic Operation” infiltrating the Church’s structures. The Jesuits, historically targeted by Masonry, have become its primary ecclesiastical instrument. Their “acknowledgment” is damage control, not justice.
The Farce of “Confidentiality”: Shielding the Abomination from Light
Bruni stresses “no information about the case can be made public while the trial is underway… to protect due process and to prevent further harm.” This is the language of the secular state, not the Church. The Church’s law demands publicatio of censures for notorious crimes to deter others and vindicate the scandalized faithful. St. Pius X in Pascendi condemned the Modernist tactic of hiding errors behind “pastoral” silence. The “confidentiality” here serves one purpose: to prevent the faithful from seeing the total absence of supernatural justice. It hides the fact that the “judges” are laymen or Modernist clerics with no jurisdiction, applying a false code, under an antipope. The Syllabus condemns the error that “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41). The conciliar sect has inverted this: it adopts the secular model of “due process” and “privacy laws” to replace the canonical publicity required for the salus animarum. The victims’ attorney, Laura Sgrò, is right to be “deeply discouraged” — but not by the “lack of transparency.” She is discouraged because she seeks justice from a synagogue of Satan that has no power to deliver it.
The Antipope Leo XIV’s Demand for “Patience”: Mockery of the Victims and Divine Law
The article cites antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) asking accusers for “patience” and stating “the Church must respect the rights of all people.” This is the voice of the Antichrist’s precursor. “Rights of all people” — the Masonic Droits de l’Homme — replaces the Rights of God and the Rights of the Church. Pius XI in Quas Primas thundered: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” Leo XIV’s “patience” is the counsel of the wicked (Ps 1:1). It tells victims: “Wait while we manage the narrative.” It tells the world: “We are a legitimate legal system.” It is a lie. The true Church, sede vacante, offers no such false tribunals. She offers the Sacrament of Penance from valid priests, the intercession of the Saints, and the certainty that Deus non irridetur (God is not mocked). The “rights” Leo XIV defends are the “rights” of the predator to a fair trial in a fake court. The Syllabus condemns: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). Leo XIV embodies this error.
The Spiritual Reality: Sacrilege, Simulated Sacraments, and the Absence of Grace
The core of the Rupnik horror is sacramental profanation. Absolving a partner in sin (complice in peccatum carnis) is a sacrilege of the most diabolical order. It turns the Tribunal of Mercy into a license for lust. The article mentions “psychological and spiritual abuse.” In the theology of the true Church, spiritual abuse by a confessor is a violation of the Sigillum and the Potestas Ordinis that cries to heaven. But in the conciliar sect, “Confession” is often a simulated sacrament. “Priests” ordained in the Novus Ordo rite (1968) by “bishops” consecrated in the Novus Ordo rite (1968) lack the character indelebilis of Orders (per the theological arguments of Abp. Thuc and the Cum ex Apostolatus Officio principle applied to the new rites). Therefore, no valid absolution occurred, no valid excommunication was incurred, and no valid lifting took place. The entire canonical charade operates on the presumption of valid Orders and Jurisdiction which does not exist. The victims were abused by a layman in a costume, protected by a hierarchy of laymen in costumes. The “spiritual abuse” was the theft of their souls’ trust by a wolf in shepherd’s clothing, enabled by the Great Apostasy.
The “Two-Lucia” Theory Applied to the Neo-Church: A Singular Apostasy
The False Fatima Apparitions document analyzes the “Two Sisters Lucia” theory and concludes there was only one Lucia, but the message was a Masonic psychological operation. Similarly, there is only one conciliar sect, though it wears many masks: “Francis,” “Leo XIV,” “Fernández,” “Jesuits,” “Dicastery.” The change in appearance (from Bergoglio to Prevost) and change in rhetoric (from “mercy” to “patience/justice”) are not a change of substance. The substance remains: Modernism, Masonry, Apostasy. The Rupnik case is Stage 3 of the disinformation strategy described in that document: “Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” Here: Takeover of the “justice” narrative by Modernists, concealment of the invalidity of Orders/Jurisdiction, “synodal” reinterpretation of canon law. The “canonical trial” is the “Miracle of the Sun” for the neo-church faithful: a mass optical manipulation (natural phenomenon of bureaucracy) and mass autosuggestion that “the Church is working.”
Conclusion: The Gates of Hell Shall Not Prevail Against the True Church
The National Catholic Register’s report is a bulletin from the occupied territory. It documents the standard operating procedure of the Church of the New Advent: simulate justice to preserve the illusion of legitimacy. The “canonical criminal trial” is a nullity. The “waiver” is a nullity. The “Dicastery” is a nullity. The “Jesuits” are a nullity. The “Antipope” is a nullity. Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus — and extra veram Ecclesiam nulla iustitia. The victims of Rupnik will find no justice in the Vatican’s courts. They will find it only in the True Church, sede vacante, persevering in the Mass of All Times, the unchanging Faith, and the true Sacraments. As Pius XI taught in Quas Primas: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” Rupnik, Fernández, Prevost, and their “tribunal” are subject to Christ the King, whether they acknowledge Him or not. Their simulated judgments are dust in the wind. Non praevalebunt.
Source:
Vatican Denies Marko Rupnik Has Been Acquitted (ncregister.com)
Date: 22.07.2026