Texas Court Blocks Infanticide in Surrogacy Horror: Conciliar Media Hails Secular Legalism Over Divine Law

EWTN News / National Catholic Register portal reports on a Texas district court ordering UT Southwestern Medical Center and Children’s Medical Center of Dallas to provide lifesaving care for baby Gabriel, due to be born September 2 to surrogate McKenna West. The child, diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, was targeted for death by his “intended parents,” Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, who sought to refuse consent for surgery and potentially move the child to California to withhold treatment. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured an emergency order mandating “medically indicated stabilizing and life-sustaining care” and barring the child’s removal from the state. The conciliar outlet frames this judicial intervention as a victory for life, quoting “Catholic” attorneys Anthony Sirven and Stefano Gennarini who analyze the dispute through the lens of the 13th and 14th Amendments and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. **This report exposes the theological bankruptcy of the conciliar sect: it reduces the grave crime of surrogate motherhood and attempted infanticide to a secular constitutional dispute, utterly silencing the immutable Catholic condemnation of artificial procreation and the absolute sovereignty of God’s Law over human life.**

The Commodification of Human Life: Surrogacy as Grave Violation of Natural and Divine Law

The very premise of the case—a “surrogacy dispute”—reveals the abyss of modern apostasy. The article speaks blithely of “intended parents,” “surrogate mother,” and “contract,” treating a human being as an object of commerce and litigation. This is the crimen nefandum of artificial procreation, explicitly condemned by the true Magisterium. Pope Pius XI in Casti Connubii (1930) thundered against any separation of the unitive and procreative ends of marriage, declaring that “any use whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life is an offense against the law of God and of nature.” The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, under the true Pope Pius XII and later Paul VI before his apostasy, in Donum Vitae (1987)—a document of the pre-apostasy CDF—condemned surrogate motherhood as “contrary to the unity of marriage and to the dignity of human procreation,” because it “sets up a division between the physical, psychological and moral elements which constitute those families.”

The “contract” cited by the attorneys is a pactum turpe, a wicked covenant purchasing a child as chattel. The “intended parents” Gilkar and Ahmed, having commissioned the creation of a human life, now seek to discard the “defective product.” This is not merely a custody battle; it is attempted murder by the biological parents, facilitated by the medico-legal complex. The conciliar report treats this horror as a legal novelty (“portend whether we’re going to decide custody based on a contract”) rather than the inevitable fruit of the contraceptive mentality and the rejection of Humanae Vitae by the conciliar sect.

Linguistic Engineering: Euphemisms Masking the Crime

The rhetoric of the article and its quoted “experts” is a masterclass in Masonic linguistic subversion. Terms like “intended parents” (replacing father and mother), “surrogate mother” (reducing the maternal bond to a gestational service), “lifesaving care” (implying medical intervention is a gift of the state rather than a duty of justice), and “property interest in human life” (Sirven’s phrase) betray a thoroughly naturalistic anthropology.

Sirven speaks of embryos as “a special kind of property” settled upon by courts relying on Roe v. Wade. **This admission—that the conciliar legal strategy accepted the premise that unborn children are property until Dobbs—is a damning indictment.** For decades, “Catholic” lawyers in the employ of the neo-church argued within the framework of the Enlightenment, conceding the personhood of the unborn to secular jurisprudence. The 13th and 14th Amendments, products of a Masonic constitutional order separating the State from Christ the King, are invoked as the bulwarks against slavery. But as Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” To invoke the Constitution against the murder of a child while ignoring the Lex Divina is to build on sand.

Theological Vacuum: The Silence of the Supernatural

Nowhere in the article—nor in the statements of the “Catholic” attorneys—is there mention of:

The soul of baby Gabriel, created immediately by God at conception.
The absolute right to Baptism for salvation (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus).
The duty of the parents under pain of mortal sin to preserve the life of their offspring.
The Social Kingship of Christ, which demands that civil law conform to the moral law of God.

Gennarini appeals to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights—a Masonic document born of the French Revolution’s Déclaration des droits de l’homme, condemned by Pius IX in the Syllabus Errorum (Prop. 39, 55, 77, 80). The Syllabus anathematizes the proposition: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (Prop. 39) and “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Prop. 55). **By grounding the defense of the child in the UN Declaration and the US Constitution, the conciliar apologists legitimize the very secular order that legalized abortion, surrogacy, and euthanasia.** They render unto Caesar the things that are God’s (the life of the innocent).

Symptomatic Level: The Conciliar Sect as Handmaid of the Antichrist

This report is not an anomaly; it is the modus operandi of the “Church of the New Advent.” EWTN, founded under the aegis of the usurper “John Paul II” and sustained by the conciliar hierarchy, functions as a paramasonic propaganda organ. It channels Catholic outrage into safe, secular, legalistic channels.

The attorneys cited—Sirven (Florida) and Gennarini (Center for Family and Human Rights, New York)—are operatives of the neo-church’s “pro-life” industry. This industry has spent fifty years begging the Supreme Court for crumbs of justice while the conciliar “popes” (John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now the antipope Leo XIV/Prevost) implemented the novus ordo, ecumenism, religious liberty, and the demolition of the Faith. The Dobbs decision is hailed as a victory, yet it rests on the 14th Amendment—a juridical fiction of the Reconstruction era—rather than the Lex Aeterna.

The article mentions the “13th Amendment” argument: that enforcing a surrogacy contract over a human life constitutes slavery. **This is a half-truth serving a lie.** Surrogacy is slavery—the slavery of the child to contract, the slavery of the woman to commodity. But the remedy is not the 13th Amendment; it is the Canon Law of the True Church (Canon 1013, 1917 Code: “Matrimonium non potest contrahi nisi inter baptizatos”—surrogacy is a simulation of procreation, a grave sin against the Sixth and Ninth Commandments) and the Divine Positive Law (“Non occides”).

The “Two Lucia Sisters” theory from the False Fatima file illustrates the conciliar method: replace the reality with a counterfeit, control the narrative, and divert from the apostasy within. Here, the reality of the child’s rights under God is replaced by “constitutional personhood”; the narrative is controlled by EWTN; the apostasy of the conciliar hierarchy (which blesses the novus ordo services of the hospitals involved, likely staffed by “priests” of the invalid rite) is diverted by a “pro-life” headline.

The Hospitals: Temples of the Abomination

UT Southwestern and Children’s Medical Center Dallas are secular institutions operating under the “ethics” of the culture of death. The court order compels them to act against their institutional will to kill. Yet the conciliar report presents this legal coercion as a triumph. **True Catholic action would demand the conversion of these institutions to the Kingship of Christ, the removal of the “abomination of desolation” (the conciliar “chaplaincies” offering invalid sacraments), and the public reparation for the sins of surrogacy and attempted infanticide.** Instead, we get a press release from Ken Paxton—a politician operating in the secular sphere—praised by a “Catholic” news agency for using “every tool at our disposal” (secular law) rather than the arma spiritualia of the Church.

Conclusion: No Peace Without the Kingship of Christ

Baby Gabriel’s life hangs by a thread of secular jurisprudence. The “intended parents” may yet win custody via contract law, as Sirven fears, making the child a ward of the state or the contractors. The conciliar sect offers no supernatural remedy, no call for the Consecratio ad Sacratissimum Cor Jesu (mandated by Pius XI in Quas Primas for the Feast of Christ the King), no denunciation of the parents as murderers in the sight of God.

“He who gives the Kingdom of Heaven does not take away earthly things!” (Quas Primas, citing Hymn Crudelis Herodes). But the conciliar sect gives neither the Kingdom of Heaven nor earthly justice; it offers only the managed decline of the Faith into NGO humanitarianism.

The only true “lifesaving care” for Gabriel—and for the surgeons, the lawyers, the surrogate, and the biological parents—is the Baptism of Water and the Spirit and submission to Christ the King. Until the “Catholic” media and its lawyers proclaim Non est aliud nomen sub caelo datum hominibus in quo oporteat nos salvari (Acts 4:12), they remain blind guides leading the blind into the pit (Matt 15:14). This article is not a report of a victory; it is a bulletin of the ongoing defeat of the conciliar counter-church.

Source:
Texas Court Orders Hospitals to Provide Lifesaving Care to Baby at Center of Surrogacy Dispute (ncregister.com)
Date: 13.08.2026