Conciliar Sect Hails Masonic Religious Liberty as Catholic Victory in California
The EWTN News portal reports that a coalition of “Catholic” legal groups, Republican politicians, and Protestant organizations has flooded the Ninth Circuit with amicus briefs supporting a lawsuit challenging California’s AB 1955, which prohibits school districts from mandating parental notification when a minor “socially transitions.” The Thomas More Society represents the plaintiffs; the Becket Fund, Alliance Defending Freedom, and a phalanx of “Catholic” academics like Robert P. George lend their prestige. The Supreme Court’s 6-3 interim injunction, hailed as a triumph for “religious freedom” and “parental rights,” is presented as a vindication of the faith. This spectacle of the conciliar sect celebrating a procedural victory in a Masonic court, wielding the very liberal categories that demolished Christendom, exposes the utter theological bankruptcy of the neo-church’s resistance.
The Naturalistic Idolatry of “Parental Rights” and “Religious Liberty”
The entire juridical edifice constructed by the Thomas More Society, the Becket Fund, and their allies rests on the heretical foundation of religious liberty and the naturalistic concept of “parental rights” abstracted from the Divine Law. The senators’ brief invokes “America’s history and tradition” and “natural bonds of affection” as the source of parental authority. This is pure naturalism, condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus Errorum (Prop. 3: “Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood, and of good and evil”). Parents do not possess “rights” against the State by virtue of nature alone; they possess duties before God (debitum) to educate their children for heaven (educatio ad finem ultimum). By framing the conflict as a clash of “rights”—parental vs. state—the conciliar lawyers concede the Masonic premise that the State is the fons et origo of rights (Syllabus, Prop. 39), merely negotiating the scope of the concession. There is no “right” to error; there is only the duty to truth. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The “victory” sought is the right to be left alone by the secular power—a libertas ecclesiae truncated to libertas naturalistica.
The Conciliar Sect’s False Ecumenism in the Courtroom
The coalition boasts “more than 70 nongovernmental organizations,” including the Christian Law Association, Christian Medical & Dental Associations, and the signatory Rick Santorum. This is indifferentism in action, a practical application of the conciliar decree Unitatis Redintegratio and the Masonic dream of a “united front” against the secular state. Pius IX condemned the proposition that “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Syllabus, Prop. 18). Here, “Catholic” lawyers stand shoulder-to-shoulder with heretics and schismatics, invoking a generic “Judeo-Christian” natural law, to argue before a tribunal that derives its authority from the Constitution of 1789—a document forged in the fires of the Enlightenment, explicitly rejecting the Social Kingship of Christ. The brief of Professors George, Moschella, and DeGroff cites “Anglo-American law” as the authoritative tradition. Since when is the Common Law of apostate England the rule of faith for Catholics? St. Pius X warned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 58): “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him.” The “development” here is the substitution of the Corpus Iuris Canonici and the Syllabus for the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court.
The Theological Vacuum: No Christ the King, No Supernatural End
Read the article closely. There is not a single mention of the Social Kingship of Christ the King. Not a word on the duty of the State to profess the Catholic Faith (Leo XIII, Immortale Dei; Pius XI, Quas Primas). Not a syllable on the eternal salvation of the children’s souls, the state of grace, the sacrament of Baptism, or the reality of Original Sin. The “harm” cited is “confusion,” “mental health struggles,” and “ideology.” This is therapeutic deism, not Catholicism. The “gender dysphoria” is treated as a medical/psychological condition to be managed by parents, not a spiritual rebellion against the Creator’s order (Male and female He created them, Gen 1:27) requiring supernatural grace and exorcism. The Thomas More Society and Becket Fund argue for the autonomy of the domestic church within the secular order, effectively accepting the separation of Church and State (Syllabus, Prop. 55) as a given. They do not demand the State convert and kneel; they demand the State step aside. This is the liberalism of Cum ex Apostolatus Officio condemned, the “reconciliation with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Syllabus, Prop. 80) which is the very definition of the conciliar apostasy.
The Symptomatic Fruit: Sedevacantism Vindicated by the “Resistance”
This legal theater is the inevitable fruit of the Great Apostasy post-1958. The “Catholic” nonprofit Thomas More Society, the “Catholic” scholars George and Moschella, the “Catholic” media outlet EWTN—all operate within the paramasonic structures occupying the Vatican. They are the controlled opposition. Their “victories” (like Mahmoud v. Taylor) legitimize the anti-Christian regime by proving its courts can deliver “justice” without Christ. They are the Novus Ordo equivalent of the Action Française condemned by Pius XI: Catholics acting as a pressure group within a Masonic democracy, rather than as the Militia Christi demanding the Regnum Christi. The fact that the “antipope” Leo XIV (Prevost) and his “bishops” remain silent on the duty of the State while their lay “lawyers” fight for “parental rights” proves the sede vacante: no true Pope would allow his flock to be led into the forum saeculare to argue natural law before heretic judges, ignoring Quas Primas and the Syllabus. The “conservative” wing of the conciliar sect is the most effective instrument of the Revolution, draining the faithful’s zeal for the Kingship of Christ into the sinkhole of constitutional litigation.
The Illusion of Victory: Strict Scrutiny as a Trap
The lawyers celebrate “strict scrutiny.” This is a Masonic procedural trap. “Strict scrutiny” means the State can override parental rights if it demonstrates a “compelling interest” narrowly tailored. Tomorrow, the State will argue that “preventing suicide” or “affirming identity” is that compelling interest. By accepting the balancing test, the conciliar lawyers have already surrendered the principle: Salus populi suprema lex esto—but the salus is defined by the State, not the Church. The Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code teaches that a cleric who “publicly defects from the Catholic faith” loses office ipso facto. The “Catholic” lawyers defect from the integral faith by invoking the First Amendment (freedom of religion) which Pius IX called “a most pestilential error” (Quanta Cura). They are ipso facto disqualified from teaching Catholic doctrine. Their “Catholic” identity is a mask for the Masonic operation, exactly as the False Fatima Apparitions document describes the “disinformation strategy”: Stage 3—”Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” Here, the “Third Secret” is the Social Kingship of Christ, concealed by the “ecumenical reinterpretation” of “religious liberty.”
Conclusion: Return to the Integral Faith, Not the Courts of Caesar
The California lawsuit is not a battle for the Church; it is a battle for the preservation of the Masonic order by its “Catholic” chaplains. The only true “parental right” is the ius divinum to raise children as soldiers of Christ in a Catholic State. The only true “religious freedom” is the libertas evangelica of the Civitas Dei crushing the civitas diaboli. Every brief filed, every senator quoted, every “Catholic” professor cited in this article is a stone in the edifice of the abomination of desolation. Non est aliud nomen sub caelo datum hominibus, in quo oporteat nos salvari (Acts 4:12)—not the Constitution, not “strict scrutiny,” not “parental rights,” but Jesus Christ the King. The conciliar sect’s celebration of this litigation is the signum contradictionis proving its apostasy. Reject the neo-church. Reject its lawyers. Reject its “victories.” Return to the Tradition. Instaurare omnia in Christo.
Source:
Coalition backs parental rights lawsuit over California transgender student policy (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 08.09.2026