Conciliar Sect Celebrates Decade of Amoris Laetitia: Institutionalization of Adultery as Pastoral Strategy
The Vatican News portal reports on a working session of the “Meeting on the Tenth Anniversary of ‘Amoris laetitia’,” convened by the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), at which the “Archbishop” of Perth, Timothy Costelloe, praised the apostolic exhortation as a “very beautiful expression of the ideal of Christian family and Christian marriage” and advocated “building relationships” with youth as the primary pastoral method, explicitly rejecting “simple answers or ‘magic bullets'” in favor of culturally variable responses to universal challenges. This gathering manifests the definitive apostasy of the conciliar sect: the substitution of the immutable divine law governing marriage with a sociological accommodation to the spirit of the world, the reduction of the Church’s magisterial authority to a facilitation of “dialogue,” and the enthronement of subjective “accompaniment” over the objective order of grace and truth.
The Antipope Leo XIV Presides Over the Celebration of Heresy
That the meeting was “called by Pope Leo” — the usurper Leo XIV, Robert Prevost — confirms the continuity of the modernist occupation of the Holy See. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, “a Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice). The line of usurpers beginning with John XXIII has consistently promulgated doctrines contrary to the depositum fidei; Amoris laetitia stands as a monumental expression of this apostasy, explicitly permitting the adulterous to approach the Holy Eucharist under the guise of “discernment” and “mitigating factors.” The “Archbishop” Costelloe’s endorsement of this document as a “beautiful expression of the ideal” constitutes a formal adhesion to heresy, severing him from the Catholic Church ipso facto according to the principle articulated by Pope Celestine I regarding Nestorius: “he could not remove anyone by sentence who himself had already shown that he must be removed” (Letter to John of Antioch). The “Meeting” is thus not an ecclesial act but a conciliar of the synagoga Satanae, ratifying the rebellion against Christ the King.
Reduction of the Sacrament of Marriage to a Cultural Construct
Costelloe’s assertion that “the response [to challenges concerning marriage] has to vary, because the cultural reality is different” epitomizes the condemned error of Modernist evolutionism and cultural relativism. The Syllabus of Pope Pius IX anathematizes the proposition that “the Church has not the power of defining dogmatically that the religion of the Catholic Church is the only true religion” (Error 21) and that “the civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41). Here, “cultural reality” replaces the civil government as the arbiter of moral truth. The indissolubility of marriage, the unity of the sacrament, the primary end of procreation — these are not “ideals” subject to pastoral adaptation but divine positive law (Can. 1012, 1917 Code; Casti Connubii, Pius XI). The Council of Trent defined: “If anyone says that the Church errs in having taught… that the bond of marriage cannot be dissolved… let him be anathema” (Sess. XXIV, Can. 7). Amoris laetitia and its apologists effectively deny this anathema, making the sacrament a wax nose to be shaped by the “cultural reality” of the neo-pagan world.
The “Synodal” Method: Democracy of the Damned
The description of the meeting — “sitting at a table… opportunity to speak more directly… hear their experiences” — reveals the synodal heresy: the substitution of the magisterium with a parliament of opinions. Pope Pius X condemned in Lamentabili sane exitu the proposition that “The Church listening cooperates in such a way with the Church teaching in defining truths of faith, that the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (Prop. 6). The “Synod on Synodality” and this “Meeting” are the institutionalization of that condemned proposition. The “bishops” become mere facilitators of a collective discernment that has no doctrinal compass. As Pius XI declared in Quas Primas: “Christ Jesus is given to men as Redeemer, in whom they are to place their hope, but at the same time He is the Lawgiver, to whom men owe obedience”. The “synodal” church recognizes no Lawgiver but the consensus of the participants.
Anthropological Inversion: Youth as Subjects of “Relationship,” Not Souls to Be Saved
Costelloe’s insistence on “seeing young people as individuals, rather than as some great big mass of people” and “building relationships, because when you have a relationship with somebody, they’re more able to hear what you’re saying” manifests the personalist heresy that reduces evangelization to human rapport. The Great Commission commands: “Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” (Matt. 28:19-20). It does not command “build relationships.” The “wide spectrum” from “committed Catholics” to those “for whom questions of faith haven’t really impacted on them yet” is addressed not by the kerygma of repentance and faith but by “different ways of reaching out” — a marketing strategy for a religious product. This is the laicism Pius XI denounced: “the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations… the Christian religion began to be equated with other false religions and shamelessly placed in the same category” (Quas Primas). The “youth” are not objects of pastoral technique but souls in danger of eternal damnation, requiring the hard sayings of the Gospel (John 6:61), not the soft accompaniment of the hireling.
Silence on Sin, Grace, and the Cross: The Gravest Accusation
The article’s — and the meeting’s — total silence on sin, the state of grace, the necessity of the sacraments, the indissolubility of marriage as a dogmatic truth, the encyclical Humanae Vitae, the condemnation of contraception, the reality of Hell, and the Final Judgment is the definitive proof of apostasy. Lamentabili condemned the Modernist error that “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Prop. 26) and that “Christian doctrine was initially Jewish, but through gradual development, it became first Pauline, then Johannine, and finally Greek and universal” (Prop. 60). The “pastoral” approach of Amoris laetitia and its celebrants treats doctrine as a malleable tool for “accompaniment,” not as the immutable truth revealed by God. As Pius XI warned: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed” (Quas Primas, quoting Ubi arcano). The conciliar sect has removed Christ from the family, from marriage, from morality — and thus destroyed the very foundation of the family it claims to “promote and proclaim and celebrate.”
The “Church’s Vision” is the Vision of the Antichrist
Costelloe speaks of “our vision of marriage.” Whose vision? The vision of the conciliar sect, which is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15). The true Church’s vision is that of Pius XI in Casti Connubii: “The nuptial bond… is by its very nature perpetual and indissoluble… not subject to the will of the parties nor to any human power”. It is the vision of the Council of Trent, of the 1917 Code, of the unbroken magisterium. The “vision” celebrated in the Vatican on October 9, 2026, is the vision of the paramasonic structure occupying Rome: a vision that blesses adultery, calls evil good, and substitutes the Social Reign of Christ the King with the reign of man. As the Syllabus condemns: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). This meeting is that reconciliation — the kiss of Judas delivered to the Bride of Christ by her false shepherds.
Conclusion: The Faithful Must Flee the Conciliar Sect
No Catholic may participate in, endorse, or remain silent about this celebration of heresy. The ipso facto vacancy of the Holy See since 1958 (or at latest 1963) demands that the faithful withdraw all recognition, obedience, and communion from the usurpers and their structures. Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code declares vacant the office of any cleric who “publicly defects from the Catholic faith”; Cum ex Apostolatus Officio declares the elevation of a heretic “null, void, and of no effect”. The “bishops” at this meeting, the “pope” who called it, the “theologians” who crafted Amoris laetitia — all have publicly defected. The true Church endures in the remnant who hold fast to the Tradition, the Mass of All Times, and the Social Kingship of Christ. “He who is not with Me is against Me; and he who gathereth not with Me scattereth” (Matt. 12:30). The gathering in the Vatican scatters; the true Church gathers around the Cross.
Source:
Archbishop Costelloe: Proclaiming the Church's vision of family (vaticannews.va)
Date: 09.10.2026