Antipopes of the Antichurch
News feed
The Digital Sweatshops of the New World Order: AI Exploitation and the Neo-Church’s Selective Humanism
Register portal reports on the Vatican presentation of the encyclical Magnifica Humanitas by the antipope Leo XIV, focusing on the exploitation of workers in artificial intelligence supply chains. Catholic theologian Léocadie Lushombo praised the document’s attention to “new forms of slavery” in digital labor, while various experts discussed the hidden human costs of AI development, including data labelers in developing countries working under dehumanizing conditions for $1.50-2 per hour. The article presents the encyclical as a prophetic intervention for human dignity in the digital age. However, this selective concern for “human dignity” by the conciliar sect reveals a profound hypocrisy: while condemning exploitation in AI supply chains, the neo-church remains structurally complicit in the very system of global subordination it pretends to critique, having abandoned the only true foundation of human dignity — the supernatural order and the Social Kingship of Christ.
When Catholic Colleges Abandon Theology, They Sacrifice Souls on the Altar of the Market
National Catholic Register portal reports (June 4, 2026) that Fordham University, a Jesuit institution in New York, has reduced its core curriculum theology and philosophy requirements from two courses each to one, effective 2031. The author, Stephen G. Adubato, laments this decision as emblematic of a broader trend among Catholic universities to prioritize STEM funding and market demands over their Catholic mission. He cites declining theology credit-hour requirements across U.S. Catholic institutions and warns that such shifts reflect not merely “liberalization” but “neoliberalization”—the subordination of sacred mission to economic survival. Adubato appeals to a recent address by “Pope” Leo XIV urging Catholic colleges to ensure the Christian vision permeates every discipline. Yet the entire commentary, while well-intentioned, operates within the framework of the post-conciliar neo-church and fails to confront the root cause of Catholic higher education’s collapse: the systematic destruction of Catholic doctrine since Vatican II.
Parental Rights as a Substitute for the Kingship of Christ in Education
EWTN News reports that the Thomas More Society, a Catholic law firm, has released guidelines for school districts aimed at “upholding parental rights” in the wake of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions, *Mahmoud v. Taylor* and *Mirabelli v. Bonta*. These guidelines advocate for parental notice and opt-out policies regarding instruction on LGBT topics and gender transition, and call for the repeal of policies that conceal information about children’s health from parents. While the protection of parental authority is a legitimate concern, the article’s framing reveals a profound theological impoverishment, reducing the Church’s mission to a secular legal battle over “rights” while remaining silent on the supernatural order, the primacy of Christ the King, and the ultimate purpose of education: the salvation of souls.
Civil Court Rightly Rejects Canonical Shield for Predator Priest — The Rosica Case Exposes the Bankruptcy of the Conciliar Sect’s Internal “Justice”
The Pillar portal reports that an Ontario appeals court has rejected a motion by the Congregation of St. Basil to dismiss a sexual assault lawsuit against Fr. Thomas Rosica, ordering the congregation to pay $14,000 in legal costs. The plaintiff, Fr. Michael Bechard, alleges that Rosica sexually assaulted him in the context of a mentoring relationship during preparations for World Youth Day 2002. Rosica and his order argued that civil courts lack jurisdiction, claiming the matter should be handled exclusively under Canon Law. The court firmly rejected this, noting that canonical courts cannot award damages or establish vicarious liability. Rosica, once a prominent Vatican spokesman and media figure, previously resigned from leadership roles in 2019 amid serial plagiarism scandals. This case lays bare the moral and institutional rot of the post-conciliar structures — structures that shelter predators behind canonical privilege while their own “reforms” prove utterly incapable of administering justice.
Varia
Announcement:
– News feed –implemented
– Antipopes separate web sites with their all documents refutation – in progress