Portal Catholic News Agency reports that “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) appealed for humanitarian aid to Myanmar while delivering a catechesis reducing the Resurrection to psychological comfort. The article states:
“The paschal mystery is the cornerstone of Christian life… every day is Easter”
and claims the “pope” urged providing “necessary humanitarian assistance” without spiritual conditions. This performance exemplifies the conciliar sect’s complete abandonment of the Church’s divine mission.
Humanitarianism as Replacement for Supernatural Charity
The usurper’s focus on material aid while omitting Myanmar’s need for conversion exposes the conciliar sect’s naturalistic perversion of charity. Pius XI condemned this inversion in Quas Primas: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony.” Nowhere does the Vatican occupier mention that Myanmar’s true crisis is rejection of Christ’s Social Kingship – a silence demonstrating adherence to the condemned proposition: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Pius IX, Syllabus of Errors 55).
The article’s description of UN statistics on displaced persons while ignoring the eternal danger of souls dying without baptism proves the conciliar sect operates under the modernist axiom: “The principal of non-intervention, as it is called, ought to be proclaimed and observed” (Syllabus 62). This constitutes formal cooperation with the error de seculo – the heresy that temporal welfare supersedes eternal salvation.
Paschal Mystery Reduced to Therapeutic Symbolism
Léo XIV’s statement that “every day is Easter” constitutes blasphemous minimization of the Resurrection’s ontological reality. Contrast this with the authentic teaching of Pope St. Pius X: “Christ… instituted anew in His Church the Sacrifice of His Body and Blood, in order to perpetuate in substance until the end of time the Sacrifice of the Cross” (Haerent Animo). The conciliar “pontiff” transforms the Empty Tomb into mere metaphor, precisely fulfilling Pius X’s warning in Lamentabili against those who claim “the Resurrection of the Savior is not properly a historical fact” (Proposition 36).
His reference to Edith Stein – canonized by the antipope Wojtyła in 1998 – compounds the offense. The conciliar sect’s elevation of this ambiguous figure (a Jewish convert to Protestantism before Catholicism) embodies the religious indifferentism condemned in Mortalium Animos: “The union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it.”
Omission as Dogmatic Heresy
The article’s most damning element is what it doesn’t contain:
- No mention of Myanmar’s 6.2% Catholic population needing sacraments amidst persecution
- No call for the Buddhist majority to convert to avoid eternal damnation
- No reference to the propitiatory Sacrifice of the Mass as true solution to suffering
- No distinction between temporal peace and the Pax Christi in Regno Christi
This silence constitutes material cooperation with the Syllabus error: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State” (Proposition 77). The usurper’s “compassion” is the very “false philanthropy” Pius VIII condemned in Traditi Humilitati as leading nations to “forget God and see the Church as their enemy.”
Rhetorical Analysis Reveals Apostate Mentality
The language employed – “humanitarian assistance,” “dialogue and reconciliation,” “mutual understanding” – derives from UN Sustainable Development Goals rather than Catholic vocabulary. Note the deliberate avoidance of terms like:
- Conversion
- Salvation
- Sacraments
- Hell
- Evangelization
This lexicon confirms the conciliar sect’s complete adoption of the naturalism condemned in Quas Primas: “The rebellion of individuals and states against the authority of Christ has produced deplorable consequences.” By promoting a cross-less “Easter hope,” Léo XIV denies the necessity of “the narrow gate” (Matthew 7:13) in favor of universalist sentimentality.
Systemic Apostasy from Divine Constitution
This episode demonstrates the conciliar sect’s adherence to the modernist proposition condemned in Lamentabili: “The Church is incapable of effectively defending evangelical ethics, because it steadfastly adheres to its views, which cannot be reconciled with modern progress” (Proposition 63). When the Vatican occupier speaks of “paschal hope” without defining hope’s proper object – eternal beatific vision – he reduces theology to psychotherapy.
The counterfeit catechesis’s focus on existential meaning (“human heart longs for fullness”) echoes the subjectivism Pius X identified as Modernism’s essence: “Religious sentiment… must be considered the rule of faith” (Pascendi 14). This transforms the Resurrection from historical victory over death into emotional crutch – precisely the “evolution of dogma” heresy defined in Lamentabili Proposition 22.
Conclusion: Eclipse of the Supernatural
The article documents not merely errors but the conciliar sect’s complete inversion of Catholic priorities. Where true popes like Benedict XV established Congregations for the Propagation of the Faith to save souls, Vatican occupiers establish NGO partnerships to sustain bodies temporarily. As St. Augustine declared: “What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?” (Matthew 16:26). This “general audience” proves Léo XIV presides over what St. Pius X called “the synthesis of all heresies” – a perfect fusion of naturalism, indifferentism, and apostasy from Christ the King.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV urges world not to forget Myanmar; says Easter ‘gives hope to everyday life’ (catholicnewsagency.com)
Article date: 05.11.2025