Ecumenical Betrayal Masquerading as Christian Unity


Ecumenical Betrayal Masquerading as Christian Unity

VaticanNews portal reports on the signing of an updated Charta Oecumenica by Archbishop Gintaras Grušas (President of the Council of European Bishops’ Conferences) and Greek Orthodox Archbishop Nikitas (President of the Conference of European Churches). The document, first signed in 2001 and now revised to address “contemporary challenges,” was presented to antipope Leo XIV during a November 2025 Rome meeting. The portal describes this as a “milestone of European ecumenical cooperation” promoting “unity, dialogue, and cooperation” among Christians to address migration, environmentalism, technology, and youth engagement.

Grušas claims the text represents “joint witness of Christianity” based on “listening to God’s Word” and shared baptism, while Nikitas boasts that “walls of separation have come tumbling down” as they now “speak the same language, the language of Christ.” Both figures emphasize working toward worldly peace, with Nikitas proposing redirecting military spending to humanitarian causes. Antipope Leo XIV reportedly endorsed their efforts as part of a “synodal journey.”

This spectacle exemplifies the conciliar sect’s systematic apostasy—replacing extra Ecclesiam nulla salus with religious indifferentism while reducing Christianity to socialist activism.


Theological Abdication of Catholic Exclusivity

The very premise of the Charta Oecumenica constitutes heresy by placing Orthodox schismatics and Protestant heretics on equal footing with the Catholic Church. Pius XI condemned such false ecumenism in Mortalium Animos (1928):

“The union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily left it.”

Grušas’ assertion that the document stems from “our baptism, which we all commonly share” ignores the Council of Trent’s anathema against those who claim baptism alone suffices for unity (Session VII, Canon 4). The 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canon 731 §2) explicitly forbids Catholics from participating in interfaith gatherings that imply parity between truth and error.

Nikitas’ jubilation over “walls of separation tumbling down” reveals the Gnostic subversion at work: The walls condemned by Christ are not doctrinal boundaries but human traditions (Mark 7:8). Satan masquerades as an “angel of light” (2 Cor 11:14) by recasting heresy as “progress.”

Naturalism Replacing Supernatural Mission

The revised Charta prioritizes temporal concerns—”migration issues,” “safeguarding Creation,” “artificial intelligence”—while omitting any mention of:
– The Social Kingship of Christ (Quas Primas, Pius XI)
– The necessity of the Catholic Faith for salvation (Singulari Quadem, Pius IX)
– Reparation for sins through the Immaculate Heart of Mary

This reduction of religion to social work fulfills St. Pius X’s warning in Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907) that Modernists reduce faith to “vital immanence,” making it “a mere vehicle for humanitarian aspirations.” When Nikitas proposes “spending more not on nuclear arms… but on finding results to cure diseases,” he echoes the Syllabus of Errors’ condemnation of those who prioritize “earthly happiness” over eternal salvation (Proposition 58).

The conciliar sect’s obsession with “listening” and “dialogue”—mentioned six times in the article—directly contradicts St. Paul’s command: “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be anathema” (Galatians 1:8).

Masonic Roots of Ecumenical Subversion

The choice to sign the document at the Abbey of the Three Fountains—where St. Paul was martyred—is a sacrilegious inversion. The Apostle who declared “One Lord, one faith, one baptism” (Eph 4:5) is now weaponized to endorse a false unity. This aligns with the Masonic strategy exposed in the False Fatima Apparitions file:

“The name ‘Fatima’: a symbol of Christian-Islamic syncretism… The ecumenism project opens the way to religious relativism.”

Antipope Leo XIV’s praise for this “synodal journey” confirms his role as an antipope. True popes cannot endorse heresy, as St. Robert Bellarmine establishes in De Romano Pontifice: A manifest heretic “ipso facto ceases to be Pope.” The 1917 Code (Canon 188.4) automatically deprives officeholders who defect from Catholic faith—precisely what occurs when antipopes promote ecumenism condemned by Pius IX (Syllabus, Proposition 16-18) and Pius XI.

Omissions That Condemn

The article’s silence on these truths proves the conciliar sect’s apostasy:
– No mention of the Unam Sanctam doctrine that submission to the Roman Pontiff is necessary for salvation
– No distinction between Catholic works of mercy (aimed at soul-saving) and secular humanitarianism
– No reference to the Fourth Lateran Council’s definition of the Church as “outside of which no one at all is saved

Instead, the apostate hierarchy parrots UN sustainability goals under the guise of “addressing contemporary challenges.” Meanwhile, the faithful remnant—those adhering to pre-1958 Catholicism—are persecuted as “divisive” for upholding immutable dogma.

As the counterfeit church accelerates toward total apostasy, Catholics must recall Pius XII’s warning:

“The day the Church abandons her perennial theology, she will cease to be the Bride of Christ.”


Source:
Leaders of European Churches discuss updated Charta Oecumenica as tool for peace
  (vaticannews.va)
Article date: 06.11.2025

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.