US Bishops’ Immigration Statement Rejects Christ’s Social Kingship
Catholic News Agency reports (November 12, 2025) that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops approved a statement opposing “indiscriminate mass deportation” of illegal immigrants during their Fall Plenary Assembly in Baltimore. The motion passed with 216 votes in favor (95% approval), five against, and three abstentions. The document condemns “dehumanizing rhetoric,” laments “arbitrary” loss of legal status by immigrants, and promotes “safe and legal pathways” for migration. Cardinal Blase Cupich amended the text to explicitly condemn deportations, claiming this demonstrates solidarity with migrants. Bishop Mark Seitz announced a national initiative to obstruct deportations while criticizing President Trump’s enforcement policies. The article notes antipope Leo XIV encouraged this stance, quoting his alleged statement: “The Church cannot stay silent before injustice.”
Naturalism Replaces Supernatural Mission
The conciliar sect’s document reduces the Church’s mission to secular activism, omitting all reference to the regnum sociale Christi (social reign of Christ) mandated by Pius XI’s Quas Primas: “Nations will be happy… only when they accept the reign of Our Savior with willing minds.” Instead of demanding immigrant conversion and submission to Catholic truth, these “bishops” parrot UN migration agendas. Their statement mentions “human dignity” seven times but never:
“the necessity of Baptism for salvation” (John 3:5),
“the duty of Catholic rulers to restrain religious error” (Pius IX, Quanta Cura),
or
“the subordination of immigration policy to the spiritual good of souls.”
This silence proves their program follows the modernist heresy condemned in Lamentabili Sane (1907): “Revelation could not be terminated by the Apostles” (Proposition 21). By treating migration as an absolute “human right,” they deny the Church’s exclusive authority to define justice.
Subversion of Traditional Immigration Principles
True Catholic teaching distinguishes between migratio iusta (just migration) and invasion. Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum (1891) insists states must “prevent foreigners from disrupting public order.” The 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canon 147) forbids clergy from aiding undocumented migrants without civil approval. Yet Seitz’s “accompaniment initiative” openly defies legitimate authority, violating Romans 13:1 (“Let every soul be subject to higher powers”). The document’s added condemnation of deportations – introduced without debate – exposes its ideological nature. Cupich’s amendment declares opposition to “indiscriminate mass deportation,” but no Catholic state ever practiced such policy. This strawman argument serves to undermine border enforcement entirely.
Pseudo-Magisterium Contra Fidem
The claim that 95% of “bishops” supported this statement demonstrates the conciliar sect’s apostasy. Valid shepherds would condemn:
- Sacrilegious communions given to illegal immigrants in mortal sin (e.g., adulterous “families”)
- Religious indifferentism by never urging conversion of non-Catholic migrants
- Subversion of national sovereignty condemned by Pius IX’s Syllabus (Proposition 39)
Their appeal to “pastoral care” in detention centers ignores Canon 1374, which forbids priests from entering heretical/secular institutions without necessity. True shepherds would demand migrant detention centers establish Catholic chapels for sacraments – not protest deportations.
Seditious Collaboration With Modernist Hierarchy
Antipope Leo XIV’s involvement proves this is a coordinated attack on Catholic states. His alleged statement – “The Church cannot stay silent before injustice” – inverts Catholic truth. The Church must remain silent before God-ordained authority (1 Peter 2:13-17) while condemning moral injustices like blasphemy or heresy. By contrast, the conciliar sect:
“…equates Catholic nations defending borders with ‘dehumanizing rhetoric'”
while ignoring the true injustice of migrants importing false religions. This fulfills Masonic goals outlined in the Syllabus (Proposition 77): “It is no longer expedient that Catholicism be held as the sole state religion.”
Conclusion: A Declaration of War Against Christ the King
This document constitutes formal heresy by:
- Denying nations’ right to self-preservation (Pius XII, 1948 Address to Historians)
- Equating illegal entry with morally acceptable migration
- Elevating secular “human dignity” above supernatural finalities
As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches (De Romano Pontifice), manifest heretics lose ecclesiastical office. These “bishops” have severed themselves from the Church by rejecting Quas Primas‘ immutable principle: “When men recognize both in private and public life that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace, and harmony.” Until they repent, their statements merit only contempt from faithful Catholics.
Source:
America’s bishops express opposition to indiscriminate mass deportations (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 12.11.2025