Neo-Modernist Sect Exploits Eucharistic Devotion for Apostate Agenda
The conciliar sect’s pseudo-episcopal conference (“USCCB”) announced plans for another “National Eucharistic Congress” in 2029, following their 2024 spectacle that attracted tens of thousands to Indianapolis. Bishop Andrew Cozzens of the Crookston modernist sect praised the event as “a time of great grace,” claiming increased Mass attendance and OCIA participation resulting from this “Eucharistic Revival” allegedly inspired by Bergoglio’s apostolic exhortation Evangelii Gaudium. The article concludes by invoking “Pope Leo XIV’s missionary zeal,” referring to the current antipope Robert Prevost.
Sacrilegious Simulation of Catholic Worship
The very notion of a “Eucharistic Congress” organized by apostate structures constitutes a theological absurdity. As Pius XI declared in Quas Primas: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony” (n. 19). Yet these false shepherds administer invalid sacraments through the Novus Ordo missae – a synthetic rite crafted by Annibale Bugnini’s Masonic committee. The so-called “Eucharistic adoration” in Lucas Oil Stadium becomes objectively idolatrous when conducted with invalid matter (likely unconsecrated bread) and by ministers lacking proper intention.
Doctrinal Subversion Through Naturalistic Rhetoric
The article’s language reveals the operation’s fundamentally naturalistic character:
“Pope Leo carries forth this missionary zeal, as he said on Corpus Christi of this year.”
This blasphemous reference to antipope Prevost as “Pope Leo” constitutes formal heresy against the dogma of papal legitimacy defined at Vatican I (Pastor Aeternus). The term “missionary zeal” replaces supernatural evangelization with horizontal activism, precisely condemned in Pius X’s Pascendi Dominici Gregis: “They affirm that the Church has no right to pass judgment on philosophy… and that the Church ought to tolerate the errors of philosophy” (n. 6).
Theological Contradictions in Eucharistic Revival Claims
Cozzens’ assertion that “the Eucharistic Revival was a great gift to our country from the Holy Spirit” constitutes blasphemy against the Third Person of the Trinity. The Holy Spirit cannot inspire apostasy from Catholic Tradition, as Leo XIII established in Satis Cognitum: “The Holy Spirit was not promised to the successors of Peter that by His revelation they might make new doctrine, but that by His assistance they might inviolably keep and faithfully expound the revelation or Deposit of Faith delivered through the Apostles.” The cited “increased Mass attendance” refers to invalid Novus Ordo services where – according to the modernist sect’s own statistics – over 70% of attendees deny the Real Presence.
Historical Revisionism and Masonic Parallels
The attempt to frame these spectacles as reviving “long-lost tradition” exposes historical illiteracy. Authentic Eucharistic Congresses (like those of 1881 and 1904) occurred within the framework of integral Catholic doctrine, not the conciliar sect’s religious indifferentism. The article’s emphasis on “encounter and mission” directly quotes Bergoglio’s modernist manifesto Evangelii Gaudium, which Pius X’s Lamentabili condemned in advance: “The dogmas which the Church proposes as revealed are not truths fallen from heaven, but a kind of interpretation of religious facts which the human mind has laboriously discovered” (Proposition 22).
The timing of these congresses follows masonic numerical symbolism (2024=2+0+2+4=8, 2029=2+0+2+9=13) recalling the Fatima deception’s 100-year cycles (1917-2017). As the False Fatima Apparitions file documents: “the name ‘Fatima’: a symbol of Christian-Islamic syncretism” – precisely the interreligious syncretism promoted at these neo-congresses.
Systemic Apostasy Concealed Behind Liturgical Pageantry
The conciliar sect’s Eucharistic events constitute spiritual traps, ensnaring well-meaning Catholics in sacrilegious worship. Pius XII’s Mediator Dei warned: “It is a perversion to make the liturgy ‘pastoral’ as they call it, or to make it a means of insinuating error under the guise of piety.” By citing antipope Prevost’s “missionary zeal” and Bergoglio’s documents as inspiration, the organizers confirm their rejection of Catholic Tradition. The “lasting fruit” Cozzens promises refers not to sanctifying grace (impossible through invalid sacraments), but to increased institutional control and fundraising – goals explicitly condemned in Pius XI’s Quas Primas: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony” (n. 19).
Source:
Bishops approve 2029 Eucharistic Congress in bid to revive ‘long-lost tradition’ (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 14.11.2025