Pseudo-Pontiff’s Utterances Reveal Systematic Apostasy from Catholic Truth
Vatican News portal (November 18, 2025) reports on the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV’s press interactions at Castel Gandolfo, wherein he endorsed the U.S. “bishops'” immigration stance, called for Ukrainian territorial concessions, lamented Nigerian violence without condemning Islamic jihad, hinted at future travels including to the Masonic-operation site of Fatima, described his tennis routines, and addressed abuse allegations against Spanish “bishop” Zornoza with bureaucratic indifference. The article exemplifies the conciliar sect’s total embrace of naturalism and abandonment of the Church’s divine mission.
Naturalistic Betrayal of Geopolitical Realities
Regarding Ukraine, the antipope declared: “The problem is that there is no ceasefire… people are dying every day. I believe we must insist on peace, beginning with a ceasefire and then dialogue.” This cowardly evasion ignores the Church’s perennial teaching that peace derives exclusively from Christ’s Kingship over nations (Pius XI, Quas Primas). By reducing the conflict to mere human negotiation—without demanding Russia’s withdrawal, condemning Orthodox schismatics’ collaboration, or invoking Mary as Protectress against Communist errors—he perpetuates Pius XII’s condemnation: “The peace of Christ is only in the Kingdom of Christ” (Radio Message, 24 December 1944).
Migration Heresy Masquerading as Compassion
The pseudo-pontiff applauded U.S. “bishops” for rejecting immigration enforcement, stating: “I would like to invite all Catholics… to listen carefully to what they have said… treating people with humanity and dignity.” This directly contradicts:
“The right of nations to preserve their ethnic and cultural identity… forbids exposing them to the corrosive action of alien immigration” (Pius XII, Address to U.S. Cardinals, 1948).
His claim that “every country has the right to determine who enters” is rendered null by insisting courts should override border sovereignty—a Trojan horse for globalist dissolution of nations. Nowhere does he reference the duty of states to prioritize baptized citizens’ welfare (Leo XIII, Immortale Dei), instead echoing Bergoglio’s Fratelli Tutti heresies.
Nigeria: Equating Persecutors with Victims
When discussing Nigerian martyrdoms, the antipope equated Christian genocide with generalized violence: “There is indeed a danger for Christians, and for everyone, Christians and Muslims.” This blasphemous moral equivalence ignores:
- Islam’s intrinsic hostility to Christianity (Pius XI, Rerum Ecclesiae).
- The martyrdom of those slain in odium fidei (1917 Code of Canon Law, Canon 2115).
By reducing persecution to “control of land” and “war economy,” he denies the supernatural battle against “the world-rulers of this darkness” (Eph 6:12).
Fatima Pilgrimage: Masonic Ritual Endorsed
The antipope’s travel plans include “Fatima,” confirming the conciliar sect’s allegiance to the Masonic psychological operation analyzed in the False Fatima Apparitions file. This 1917 illusion—timed with Freemasonry’s 200-year cycles—served to distract from modernism’s infiltration, exactly as the current Vatican regime exploits false mysticism to supplant true devotion.
Recreational Vanity Replaces Asceticism
Describing his Tuesdays, the usurper boasted: “A bit of sport… a bit of tennis, a bit of swimming… human beings must take proper care of themselves.” Contrast this with St. Pius X’s directive: “The first care of the priest is to be holy, which requires prayer, study, and mortification” (Haerent Animo). When true popes spoke of “rest,” they meant spiritual retreats—not athleticism echoing Paul VI’s scandalous skiing photos.
Abuse Scandal: Bureaucracy Over Justice
Regarding “Bishop” Zornoza, the antipope deferred to “protocols” and “processes,” illustrating the conciliar sect’s refusal to implement Canon 2319 of the 1917 Code (automatic excommunication for clerics committing immoral acts). His concern for “safe places” for accusers mimics secular HR departments, rejecting the Church’s judicial severity against sacrilege (Council of Trent, Session XXIV).
Theological Atrocities in Rhetorical Analysis
Linguistically, the antipope’s speech drips with modernist poison:
- “Human dignity” replaces imago Dei, becoming an anthropocentric idol (Condemned in Syllabus of Errors, Proposition 64).
- “Dialogue” substitutes for conversion, violating Mortalium Animos‘ prohibition on false ecumenism.
- “Ceasefire” prioritizes temporal tranquility over defense of Christian civilization (Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique).
The article’s silence on repentance, grace, and the Social Reign of Christ exposes its diabolical disorientation.
Omissions Condemned by Catholic Principle
Nowhere does the antipope:
- Invoke the Immaculate Heart against Russia’s errors—confirming Fatima’s falsity.
- Demand Nigeria’s government establish Catholicism as the state religion (Pius IX, Quanta Cura).
- Repudiate the U.S. “bishops'” apostasy in promoting illegal immigration.
His entire discourse operates within Vatican II’s Gaudium et Spes framework, which the Lamentabili Decree preemptively anathematized as placing “the Church within human history” (Proposition 22).
Source:
Pope highlights dignity of migrants, supports U.S. bishops' statement (vaticannews.va)
Date: 18.11.2025