Apostate Itinerary: Leo XIV’s Planned Pilgrimage to False Shrines Exposes Conciliar Apostasy

Apostate Itinerary: Leo XIV’s Planned Pilgrimage to False Shrines Exposes Conciliar Apostasy

Catholic News Agency reports that the Vatican usurper Jorge Mario Bergoglio (alias “Pope” Leo XIV) intends to visit Portugal’s Fátima and Mexico’s Guadalupe shrines, alongside Peru, Argentina, and Uruguay. The article frames these intended visits as pious acts, stating: “He would love to travel and that his top destinations are the Marian shrines of Fátima in Portugal and Guadalupe in Mexico” while noting his scheduled trip to Turkey and Lebanon this November.


Promotion of False Apparitions as Conciliar Ecclesiology

The Bergoglian antipope’s prioritization of Fátima and Guadalupe exposes the conciliar sect’s foundational error: replacing supernatural faith with naturalistic sentiment. Fátima, condemned as a Masonic psychological operation in theological analyses, exemplifies this substitution. As documented in theological critiques, its “message focuses on external threats (communism), omitting the main danger: modernist apostasy within the Church since the beginning of the 20th century” (False Fatima Apparitions). By elevating this false apparition, Bergoglio continues the conciliar project of replacing dogmatic clarity with apocalyptic sensationalism.

Similarly, Guadalupe – despite its historical roots – has been weaponized by modernists to promote religious syncretism. Pius XI’s Quas Primas condemns such equivocation: “The state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men” (Quas Primas, §18). Bergoglio’s pilgrimage plan constitutes not devotion but idolatrous nationalism, reducing the Church’s mission to geopolitical theater.

Naturalization of the Supernatural: The “Jubilee of Hope” Scandal

The article references Bergoglio’s “Jubilee Year of Hope” as justification for delayed travel plans. This fabricated celebration epitomizes the conciliar sect’s abandonment of lex orandi, lex credendi. Contrast this with Pius XI’s establishment of Christ the King’s feast: “To oppose the plague of secularism… We institute the feast of Our Lord Jesus Christ the King” (Quas Primas). Whereas true popes instituted feasts to combat errors, antipopes invent jubilees to normalize apostasy.

Bergoglio’s remark that “we’re going ahead living each day with activities” reveals the conciliar mindset condemned by St. Pius X: “A non-Christian in no way can be Pope… a manifest heretic cannot be Pope” (Defense of Sedevacantism). A valid pontiff governs through doctrinal clarity, not bureaucratic scheduling.

Omissions That Condemn: Silence on the Social Reign of Christ

Nowhere does Bergoglio mention the social kingship of Christ – the foundational principle for Catholic nations. Pius XI’s encyclical demolishes this silence: “Rulers of states… let them fulfill this duty themselves and with their people, if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate” (Quas Primas §19). Bergoglio’s proposed visits to Argentina and Uruguay – nations that have legalized abortion and gender ideology – constitute not pastoral care but tacit approval of their apostasy.

The article’s description of Bergoglio “leaving the papal residence at Castel Gandolfo” symbolizes the conciliar sect’s exile from truth. True popes used Castel Gandolfo for spiritual retreat; antipopes use it as a stage for heresy. As Pius IX’s Syllabus declares: “The Roman pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself with progress, liberalism and modern civilization – condemned error” (Syllabus of Errors, §80).

Liturgical Anarchy Disguised as “Pastoral Care”

Bergoglio’s travel plans coincide with his attacks on authentic liturgy. The article notes his call for liturgy “‘sober in its solemnity’ while respecting popular piety” – code for replacing sacrifice with spectacle. This echoes Modernist condemned by St. Pius X: “The sacraments merely serve to remind man of the presence of the ever-benevolent Creator” (Lamentabili Sane, §41). True Catholic worship demands latria, not anthropological displays.

Conclusion: Itinerary of Apostasy

Bergoglio’s travel manifesto confirms the conciliar sect’s complete rupture with Catholic Tradition. From promoting false apparitions to ignoring Christ’s social kingship, every proposed destination serves the Modernist agenda. As the Church teaches through Pius XI: “Nations will be in unrest until they recognize Christ as King” (Quas Primas). Until true hierarchy restores the Lex Christi over nations, such papal tourism remains but Satan’s pilgrimage.


Source:
Pope Leo XIV says he hopes to visit Portugal, Mexico, Peru, Argentina, and Uruguay
  (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 19.11.2025

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.