Apostolic Usurper Leo XIV Peddles Modernist Deception Under Guise of “Hope”

Apostolic Usurper Leo XIV Peddles Modernist Deception Under Guise of “Hope”

The conciliar sect’s Vatican News portal reports that antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) addressed Latvian pilgrims on November 24, 2025, claiming that Christian hope “does not mean having all the answers, but rather it calls us to put our trust in God.” This rhetorical trickery masks the systematic dismantling of Catholic eschatology, substituting supernatural virtue with naturalistic sentimentality devoid of doctrinal content.


Usurpation of Apostolic Authority Through False Shepherds

The very premise of this “audience” constitutes sacrilegious theater. Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code explicitly states that “Any office becomes vacant ipso facto and without any declaration if the cleric […] publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” Since the antipope engages in ecumenical apostasy by treating heretical sects as equals – condemned by Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (Prop. 16-18) – he manifestly lacks jurisdiction. St. Robert Bellarmine’s doctrine proves decisive: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope” (De Romano Pontifice II.30).

The article’s reference to “Pope Francis’ 2018 visit” compounds this fraud. Both Bergoglio and his successor Prevost belong to the “synagogue of Satan” (Pius IX, Multiplices inter), having publicly espoused heresies condemned by Pius X’s Lamentabili sane (Prop. 22, 58). Their mutual recognition exposes the counterfeit apostolic succession within the conciliar sect.

Theological Subversion of Hope as Natural Sentiment

“Hope does not mean having all the answers, but rather it calls us to put our trust in God.”

This definition constitutes modernist heresy by divorcing hope from its theological object. Pius XI’s Quas primas establishes Christ’s kingship as hope’s foundation: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony.” The antipope reduces hope to subjective trust while omitting:

  • Necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
  • Obligation to believe defined dogmas (Vatican I, Dei Filius)
  • Eschatological judgment awaiting those outside the Church

Ecumenical Betrayal Disguised as “Christian Heritage”

The article’s reference to Latvia’s “vital role the Christian faith played in your country’s history” constitutes deliberate ambiguity. Pius IX’s Syllabus condemns the notion that “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Prop. 18). By not specifying Catholic faith while praising Latvia’s ecumenical regime (where 24% belong to Russian Orthodox schismatics), the antipope advances religious indifferentism.

His appeal to “turn to God” amidst regional conflicts deliberately omits the only solution taught by Catholic tradition: “There is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). Pius XI’s Quas primas mandates: “Rulers of nations must give public honor and obedience to Christ,” not generic “trust in God.”

Pilgrimage Reduced to Therapeutic Self-Discovery

“A pilgrimage does not end but its seeds should take root in your daily discipleship.”

This psychologized distortion strips pilgrimage of its penitential and sacramental dimensions. True Catholic pilgrimages aim at:

  • Gaining indulgences (Code of Canon Law 1917, Can. 911)
  • Venerating relics of canonized saints (Council of Trent, Sess. XXV)
  • Receiving valid sacraments from priests in communion with the true Church

By contrast, the antipope’s “pilgrimage” promotes modernist self-actualization: “It takes us away from the routine and noise of everyday life […] offers the space and silence to hear God’s voice.” Pius X condemned this subjectivist error: “Revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God” (Lamentabili, Prop. 20).

Ominous Silence on Russia’s Schismatic Hegemony

The article’s fleeting reference to “current conflict in your region” deliberately obscures Latvia’s subjugation to Russian Orthodox aggression. St. Pius X’s encyclical against modernism warned of the “enemies within” who enable schismatics. Yet the antipope offers vacuous “trust in God” instead of:

  • Condemning Moscow’s ecclesiastical imperialism
  • Urging conversion of Orthodox schismatics to Catholicism
  • Reaffirming Our Lady’s true message at Fatima (rejected as “false apparition” per provided file)

This silence confirms the conciliar sect’s complicity in advancing Moscow’s pan-Orthodox heresy, a betrayal underscored by the provided file’s analysis: “The imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’ opens the way to religious relativism.”

Conclusion: Apostate Liturgy of Hollow Words

Prevost’s performance exemplifies the conciliar sect’s modus operandi: replace Catholic substance with emotional platitudes while maintaining ecclesiastical pageantry. As Pius X warned in Pascendi, modernists “make the void within the Church and the error outside of it.” True Catholics must reject this counterfeit “hope” and cling to the unchanging Faith until Christ restores His Church through legitimate shepherds.


Source:
Pope Leo XIV: Hope does not mean having all the answers but trusting in God
  (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 24.11.2025

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.