The article from Catholic News Agency portal (November 27, 2025) reports on antipope Leo XIV’s address to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Ankara. The antipope denounced “might is right” mentalities while praising Turkey as “a source of stability” and “crossroads of sensibilities” that invites fraternity “recognizing differences.” He invoked the memory of Angelo Roncalli (“John XXIII”) as “Turkish Pope” and endorsed the 1700th anniversary of Nicaea Council celebrations. The address emphasized dialogue, pluralism, and global cooperation while warning against artificial intelligence exacerbating inequalities. The portal frames this as promoting peace through interreligious harmony, with Turkey presented as model of coexistence.
Erasure of Christ’s Sovereignty in Favor of Naturalistic Pluralism
The Ankara speech constitutes systematic apostasy from Catholic dogma by substituting the Social Kingship of Christ with Masonic universalism. While Pius XI declared in Quas primas (1925) that “nations will no longer seek peace and concord” until recognizing Christ’s reign, the antipope’s appeal to Turkish “stability” implicitly denies this truth. His statement that “uniformity would be an impoverishment” directly contradicts the Church’s perennial teaching that extra Ecclesiam nulla salus – outside the Church there is no salvation (Council of Florence, Session 11).
This naturalistic framework manifests in the celebration of Turkey’s Islamic government as promoting “fraternity.” The unstated premise – that false religions contribute positively to human flourishing – constitutes heresy condemned by Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864): “Good hope at least is to be entertained of the eternal salvation of all those who are not at all in the true Church of Christ” (Error 17). When the article praises Erdoğan’s refugee policies without mentioning Turkey’s genocide against Armenian Christians or ongoing persecution of remaining Catholics, it reveals the diabolical inversion underlying this false ecumenism.
Roncallian Hermeneutic: Trojan Horse for Modernist Subversion
The invocation of Angelo Roncalli (“John XXIII”) as exemplary figure exposes the address’s modernist foundations. Pius X’s encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907) condemned the evolutionary view that “Revelation…did not cease with the apostles” (Condemned Proposition 21). Yet the antipope celebrates Roncalli precisely for advancing this error during his Constantinople nunciature (1935-1944), when he laid groundwork for religious indifferentism by claiming Catholics shouldn’t “proselytize” among Orthodox schismatics.
This aligns with the article’s glowing reference to Nicaea Council commemorations – not as triumph of orthodox Christology, but as celebration of “encounter and sustained dialogue.” The doctrinal reality, as articulated by St. Athanasius against Arians at Nicaea, demands condemnation of error, not dialogue with it: “Let the non-Christians know that we are not content with a religion at a discount” (Letter to Serapion). By reducing Nicaea to mere historical encounter, the antipope advances the modernist belief that dogmas are “interpretations of religious facts” (Condemned Proposition 22, Lamentabili Sane).
Artificial Intelligence as Scapegoat for Apostasy’s Fruits
The speech’s warning about AI entrenching inequalities constitutes Marxist diversion from the true crisis: the conciliar sect’s abandonment of divine law. Pius XI taught in Divini Redemptoris (1937) that only Christ’s reign brings authentic social justice, yet the antipope’s solution – global cooperation to “repair…human family” – omits any reference to mankind’s need for redemption through the Blood of Christ.
When the article applauds Turkey’s “interreligious harmony,” it ignores how this “harmony” requires Catholics to deny their faith publicly. The Turkish government’s 2023 demolition of the 700-year-old Surp Giragos Armenian Church in Diyarbakır – with nary a protest from Erdoğan – demonstrates the regime’s true stance toward Christianity. That the Vatican apparatus praises such persecutors reveals its own apostate nature, fulfilling Pius X’s warning about modernists who “put themselves on a level with false religions” (Editae Saepe, 1910).
From Vicar of Christ to Chaplain of the New World Order
The article’s celebration of Turkey as “bridge between Asia and Europe” unveils the conciliar sect’s geopolitical apostasy. Whereas Pius XII condemned neutralism between Christ and Belial in Ci Riesce (1953), the antipope’s bridge symbolism embraces UN-style syncretism. His call for “just and lasting peace” absent submission to Christ the King mocks the angelic hymn announcing “peace to men of good will” – those united to God through His Church.
This address marks not papal diplomacy but capitulation to Islamic dominance. By praising Atatürk – whose regime executed Catholic priests and confiscated Church properties – while ignoring Turkey’s 99.8% Muslim demographic reality, the antipope validates the Islamic suppression of Christianity. The article’s silence about Hagia Sophia’s continued desecration as mosque parallels the Vatican II sect’s broader betrayal, fulfilling St. Pius X’s prophecy: “The great movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of a One-World Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy…” (Letter on the Sillon, 1910).
Source:
Pope Leo denounces ‘might is right’ in address to Turkish authorities (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 27.11.2025