Conciliar Sect’s Advent Message Betrays Supernatural Hope for Man-Centered Activism
Vatican News portal (December 6, 2025) reports on a “Jubilee Audience” where antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) promotes Advent as a season of “active waiting” through “good actions” to “help bring the Kingdom of God closer.” The article quotes the antipope claiming: “God involves us in His story, in His dreams… To hope, then, is to participate,” while invoking Vatican II’s “signs of the times” concept and praising a Catholic Action member who died in political activism. The catechesis concludes with the blasphemous assertion that “No one saves the world alone. Not even God wants to save it alone: He could, but He does not want to, because together is better.”
Naturalization of Supernatural Hope
The article’s central premise – that Christian hope consists primarily in human action – constitutes fundamental betrayal of Catholic eschatology. Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas (1925) definitively taught that Christ’s Kingship “is primarily spiritual and relates mainly to spiritual matters,” with temporal affairs ordered toward man’s supernatural end. The conciliar sect’s reduction of hope to social activism directly violates the condemnation in Lamentabili Sane (1907) against those who claim “revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God” (Proposition 20).
When the antipope states “God is not outside the world… we have learned… to seek Him in the realities of life,” he promotes the immanentist heresy condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907): “They put forward the proposition that the divine reality does not exist in itself but only in man.” True Catholic hope rests not in human effort but in God’s gratuitous grace, as the Council of Trent infallibly defined: “Man… cannot by his own free will move himself to justice in God’s sight” (Session VI, Canon 3).
Subversion of Lay Vocation
The praise for Alberto Marvelli’s political activism continues the conciliar sect’s distortion of lay vocation into worldly engagement. Contrast this with Pius XII’s authentic teaching: “The faithful, more precisely the lay faithful, find themselves on the front lines of the Church’s life; for them the Church is the animating principle for human society” (Discourse to New Cardinals, February 20, 1946). The article’s hero died pursuing temporal reconstruction, while true lay saints like St. Thomas More demonstrated that lay holiness consists in resisting worldly powers when they oppose Christ the King.
Collegialist Heresy in Salvation
The antipope’s declaration that “No one saves the world alone. Not even God wants to save it alone” constitutes blasphemous denial of Christ’s unique mediatorship. The Council of Florence infallibly taught: “No one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he sheds his blood for Christ, can be saved unless he remains in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church” (Session 11, February 4, 1442). The conciliar sect’s “synodal path” echoes this heresy, implementing the modernist tenet that “truth changes with man” (Lamentabili, Proposition 58).
Ommission of Necessary Warnings
Nowhere does the article mention:
- The necessity of sacraments (especially Penance) to prepare for Christ’s coming
- The reality of Judgment facing every soul
- The Church’s exclusive mediation through her sacerdotal ministry
This silence confirms the sect’s complete abandonment of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, substituting social activism for the supernatural economy of salvation. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) condemns such naturalism: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Proposition 55) – precisely the secularizing trajectory of the conciliar sect’s “active waiting” paradigm.
Vatican II as Theological Foundation
The article’s invocation of “signs of the times” (Gaudium et Spes 4) reveals the poisonous root of these errors. Pius VI warned in 1791 against the revolutionary concept of “signs of the times,” condemning those who “justify themselves by what they call the spirit of the age and the signs of the times” (Quod Aliquantum). The conciliar sect’s embrace of this condemned principle explains its transformation of Advent – formerly a season of penitential preparation – into a celebration of human effort divorced from sacramental life.
Conclusion: Abandonment of Christ the King
This “Jubilee Audience” exemplifies the conciliar sect’s complete rupture from Catholic eschatology. Where Pius XI established Christ’s social Kingship through the feast of Christ the King, the antipope reduces God’s Kingdom to human political action. Where traditional Advent liturgies cry “Rorate caeli desuper” for supernatural redemption, the neo-church promotes horizontal activism. As the Syllabus condemns: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Proposition 80) – precisely the program implemented in this heretical catechesis.
Source:
Pope at Audience: Advent teaches us how to wait in active hope (vaticannews.va)
Date: 06.12.2025