Vatican News portal (December 10, 2025) reports on the publication of an English-language textbook titled “The Wellbeing of the Child: Promotion – Protection – Rights” by Myriam Wijlens and Yeshica Marianne Umaña Calderón. The work emerges from an interdisciplinary course at the University of Erfurt involving UN officials, psychologists, and conciliar church figures like Luis Alà Herrera of the “Pontifical” Commission for the Protection of Minors. Praised for its “innovative, digital, and international” approach, the textbook claims to advance abuse prevention while allegedly fulfilling the “Church’s mission of proclamation.” This synthesis of secular child protection frameworks with conciliar rhetoric exemplifies the neo-church’s definitive abandonment of sacramental supernaturalism in favor of naturalistic social engineering.
Substitution of Divine Law with UN Humanism
The textbook’s reliance on UN representatives and secular psychologists constitutes an open betrayal of Quas Primas (Pius XI, 1925), which declared: “The empire of our Redeemer embraces all men. […] It would be a grave error […] to say that Christ has no authority whatever in civil affairs” (§17-18). By elevating UN protocols to parity with canonical principles, the authors commit the error condemned in the Syllabus of Errors: “The State […] is the source of all rights” (Pius IX, Proposition 39). Nowhere does the article mention the primacy of sanctifying grace or the sacramental protection afforded by baptism and confirmation – the only true safeguards against spiritual abuse.
Omission of Mortal Sin and Sacramental Economy
The term “abuse prevention” is stripped of its theological gravity, reduced to bureaucratic risk management. True Catholic protection of minors requires:
- Excommunication of perpetrators (Canon 2359 §2, 1917 Code)
- Mandatory denunciation to civil and ecclesiastical tribunals
- Public penance before sacramental reconciliation
Instead, the textbook promotes secular therapeutic models while omitting:
the necessity of sacramental confession for abusers, the eternal consequences of scandalizing little ones (Matthew 18:6), and the Church’s divine authority to bind and loose sins (John 20:23).
This silence confirms Lamentabili Sane‘s condemnation of Modernists who “reject the supernatural origin of […] sacraments” (Proposition 41).
False Mission of Proclamation
Wijlens’ claim that “theological teaching must create offerings that reach all students” inverts the Church’s divine mandate. As Pius XII taught: “The Church does not […] have the mission to lead men to […] material prosperity” (Mystici Corporis, 1943). The Erfurt course’s boasting of 3,000 enrolled students exemplifies the conciliar sect’s obsession with quantitative “reach” over doctrinal purity – a violation of Pascendi Dominici Gregis which condemned Modernist educational methods that “adapt […] Catholic doctrine to secular science” (§45).
Canonical Illegitimacy of Collaborators
The involvement of Luis Alà Herrera – secretary of Bergoglio’s “Pontifical” Commission – renders the project canonically invalid. The 1917 Code establishes that only the Holy Office (Canon 247) holds jurisdiction over faith and morals cases. These post-conciliar commissions lack apostolic mandate, functioning as public relations tools to deflect from hierarchy’s systemic apostasy. Robert Murphy’s participation as “Deputy Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the UN” compounds the scandal, making the Roman See appear subordinate to the very New World Order condemned by Pius XI as “satanic” (Divini Redemptoris, §17).
Symptomatic Silence on Parental Rights
The textbook’s emphasis on state-centric “child rights” directly opposes Pius XI’s teaching that “the family holds directly from the Creator the mission […] to educate the offspring” (Divini Illius Magistri, §17). This omission reveals the neo-church’s alignment with UN Convention on the Rights of the Child – an instrument used globally to:
- Override parental objections to LGBT indoctrination
- Justify state seizure of homeschooled children
- Promote contraceptive access for minors
True Catholic child protection begins with Casti Connubii‘s defense of “parents’ prior right to the education of children” (Pius XI, 1930) – a principle nowhere acknowledged in the article or textbook.
Conclusion: Neo-Gnostic Substitution of Grace
The Erfurt project epitomizes the conciliar sect’s final mutation: replacing sacramental economy with secular social work. What Bergoglio’s structure labels “child protection” is but a Satanic mimicry – offering psychological coping mechanisms while withholding exorcisms, sacramentals, and the Church’s authentic juridical power to anathematize predators. As the true Church taught through Leo XIII: “When society […] refuses to be subject to Jesus Christ […] it rushes with suicidal violence into destruction” (Annum Sacrum, 1899). Until the usurpers publicly abjure Vatican II and submit to pre-1958 magisterium, their “protection” initiatives remain spiritual poison wrapped in bureaucratic plastic.
Source:
Canon lawyers present new standard work on child welfare (vaticannews.va)
Date: 10.12.2025