The Catholic News Agency (CNA) portal reports on December 11, 2025, that a majority of U.S. Catholic voters support President Donald Trump’s mass deportation policies despite opposition from the “U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops” (USCCB). According to an EWTN/RealClear poll, 54% of self-identified Catholics endorse “broad-scale deportations,” with higher support among weekly Mass attendees (58%) and white Catholics (60%). The article notes that the USCCB recently condemned such policies with 95% approval, while antipope Leo XIV urged compliance with the bishops’ stance. White House officials frame Trump’s policies as defending “people of faith,” while academics debate whether the bishops’ liberal immigration stance aligns with historical Catholic teaching.
Naturalism Replaces Supernatural Charity in Conciliar Sect’s Teachings
The USCCB’s November 2025 statement opposing “indiscriminate mass deportation” epitomizes the conciliar sect’s systematic abandonment of Catholic integralism. Pius XI’s encyclical Quas primas (1925) establishes that “the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ,” requiring nations to order immigration policies according to divine law rather than humanitarian sentimentality. The modernist bishops invert this hierarchy by treating immigration as a purely temporal issue, ignoring the primary duty of civil authorities to protect the spiritual and temporal common good of their citizens. Their statement contains zero references to the conditions for lawful immigration outlined in the Catechism of the Council of Trent – particularly the immigrant’s duty to “obey [host nations’] laws” and “assist in carrying civic burdens” (CCC §2241). This omission reveals their immanentist hermeneutic that reduces Christianity to social activism.
Antipope’s Endorsement Confirms Apostate Trajectory
When antipope Leo XIV urges Americans to “listen to [the bishops]” on immigration, he perpetuates the conciliar sect’s rebellion against immutable doctrine. The Syllabus of Errors (1864) condemns proposition 77 that “the Catholic religion should no longer be held as the only religion of the State,” yet these false shepherds demand pluralistic accommodation of illegal immigrants who reject Christ’s social kingship. Their posture directly violates Pius IX’s condemnation of the notion that “the Church ought to be separated from the State” (Proposition 55). While St. Pius X’s Lamentabili sane (1907) anathematized modernist claims that “revealed truths are interpretations of religious facts” (Proposition 22), the USCCB treats Catholic teaching on immigration as malleable sociological commentary rather than divine law.
Faithful Catholics Instinctively Resist Modernist Betrayal
That 58% of weekly Mass attendees support deportations demonstrates the supernatural sensus fidei resisting modernist corruption. These Catholics intuitively grasp what the conciliar hierarchy denies: that nations have not only the right but the duty to protect their borders against invaders who threaten social order. The Cathecism of Pope Pius X teaches that civil authorities must “prohibit entry to those who would corrupt the people” – a principle applied for centuries through Christian states’ immigration restrictions. The poll’s finding that Latino Catholics oppose deportations by only 39% further exposes the USCCB’s manipulation of ethnicity to advance collectivist agendas. True Catholic unity flows from shared adherence to veritatis splendor, not tribal identity politics.
Trump Administration’s Selective “Pro-Faith” Posturing
The White House’s boast about defending “people of faith” rings hollow amid its failure to restore Christ’s social reign. While stopping child mutilation and defunding Planned Parenthood are praiseworthy, Trump’s alliance with Zionist interests and refusal to recriminalize heresy betray a utilitarian approach to religion. Pascendi Dominici gregis (1907) warned that modernists reduce faith to “individual experience,” precisely the error when administration officials frame policy through subjective “patriotic” sentiment rather than objective submission to Regnum Christi. Until the president publicly consecrates America to the Sacred Heart – renouncing the 1792 consecration to “Liberty” by apostate Bishop Carroll – his policies remain naturalistic maneuvers devoid of supernatural merit.
Academic Duplicity Masked as Historical Analysis
CUA professor Julia Young’s claim that U.S. bishops historically supported immigrants deliberately obscures key distinctions. Nineteenth-century prelates like Archbishop Hughes insisted Catholic immigrants assimilate into America’s Christian constitutional order, not subvert it. Her comparison to “anti-Catholic nativism” ignores that Know-Nothings opposed Catholics precisely because they (correctly) saw them as papal loyalists – whereas today’s illegal immigrants largely reject Catholic morality. Pecknold’s criticism of bishops’ “liberal presuppositions” remains inadequate, failing to name their apostasy from the extra Ecclesiam nulla salus principle. Both academics exemplify the conciliar sect’s corruption of Catholic education, treating doctrine as negotiable “prudential matter” rather than divine mandate.
The conciliar sect’s immigration stance constitutes spiritual treason against Christ the King. By prioritizing illegal invaders’ temporal comfort over citizens’ eternal salvation – and encouraging sacrilegious communions through lax border policies – these false shepherds accelerate society’s descent into chaos. True Catholics must resist both globalist dissolution and nationalist naturalism, demanding instead the restoration of the Social Kingship of Jesus Christ through the consecration of nations to His Sacred Heart and the public recrimination of heresy. Only when civil leaders acknowledge the Regal Office of Christ (Quas primas §18) will immigration serve rather than subvert the common good.
Source:
Poll: Most Catholic voters support Trump, deportations despite bishops’ concern (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 11.12.2025