Bergoglian Sect Exploits Guadalupe to Promote Conciliar Apostasy
The VaticanNews portal (December 12, 2025) reports on a so-called “Mass” celebrated by antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) in honor of Our Lady of Guadalupe. The article describes this modernist spectacle as emphasizing Mary bringing “joy where human joy is lacking,” with direct quotes attributed to the usurper: “Mary throughout her life brings joy to places where human joy is insufficient” and “Our Lady of Guadalupe proclaims the core of her message: ‘Am I not here, I who am your mother?’” The text concludes with Leo XIV’s prayer asking Mary to teach the world “not to be divided into irreconcilable factions” and to “support him in his ministry as the Successor of St Peter.” This performance exemplifies the conciliar sect’s systematic perversion of authentic Marian devotion into a vehicle for religious indifferentism.
Naturalistic Reduction of Marian Doctrine
The usurper’s homily substitutes Catholic Mariology with emotional appeals detached from doctrinal substance. By framing Mary’s role as merely supplying “joy where human joy is insufficient,” Leo XIV reduces the Theotokos to a therapeutic figure—a direct violation of Pope Pius XII’s encyclical Ad Caeli Reginam (1954), which declares: “Mary must be proclaimed as Queen… to bring about the reign of Christ the King through those same virtues which she practiced” (n. 39). The authentic Catholic understanding recognizes Our Lady as Mediatrix of All Graces, whose Fiat at Calvary obtained mankind’s redemption through the Blood of her Divine Son.
Bergoglio’s puppet omits all reference to Mary’s unbloody martyrdom at the foot of the Cross (St. Bernard, Sermo in Dominica infra Octavam Assumptionis), her crushing of heresies (Pius IX, Ineffabilis Deus), and her warnings against eternal punishment at Fatima—a condemned apparition whose false messages this sect ironically promotes while suppressing its call for repentance. The Guadalupe narrative itself is weaponized to suggest divine approval of vernacular worship, as Leo XIV emphasizes: “the Virgin spoke to St Juan Diego in his mother tongue.” This implies a relativistic endorsement of liturgical pluralism condemned by Pope Pius VI in Auctorem Fidei (1794) as “injurious to the Church” (Proposition 33).
Sacrilegious Simulation of Sacraments
The event’s description as a “Mass” constitutes blasphemy against the Most Holy Sacrifice. The conciliar sect’s invalid rites—established through Paul VI’s Missale Romanum (1969)—lack the essential form for confecting the Eucharist (St. Pius V, Quo Primum). Canon 926 of the 1917 Code requires priests to “consecrate in Latin,” rendering vernacular services sacrilegious parodies. When the article quotes Leo XIV’s petition—“may we, like you, keep the Gospel in our hearts”—it exposes the neo-modernist equation of Scripture with subjective experience, condemned in Pius X’s Lamentabili Sane (Proposition 21: “Revelation… did not cease with the Apostles”).
True Catholic worship demands the Immemorial Mass, where Mary’s Queenship is honored through the Salve Regina and the priest’s whispered “Per eundem Christum Dominum nostrum” at the Offertory. The conciliar sect’s table gatherings instead ape Protestant communion services, invalidating any purported Eucharistic presence (Council of Trent, Session XIII, Canon 1).
Subversion of Papal Primacy
Leo XIV’s request for Mary to “support him in his ministry as the Successor of St Peter” constitutes a grotesque usurpation. The antipope’s invalid “ministry” flows from the false Vatican II ecclesiology that denies the Church’s visibility and monarchical constitution (Pius XII, Mystici Corporis 63). True Roman Pontiffs—from St. Peter to Pius XII—never begged saints to legitimize their God-given authority.
The usurper’s call to avoid “irreconcilable factions” masks the sect’s true agenda: enforcing doctrinal surrender. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors condemns this deception: “The Roman Pontiff can… reconcile himself with progress, liberalism, and modern civilization” (Proposition 80). Authentic Catholic unity requires submission to immutable dogma, not the Bergoglian “synodal path.”
Omission of Supernatural Realities
Nowhere does the homily mention sin, Hell, or the need for conversion—the very heart of Mary’s messages at true apparitions like La Salette (approved by Bl. Pius IX). Instead, the text promotes a naturalistic “joy” detached from sanctifying grace. When Leo XIV urges Mary to “strengthen families,” he omits the Church’s teaching that marriage is intrinsically indissoluble (Council of Trent, Session XXIV) and ordered toward procreation (Pius XI, Casti Connubii).
The article’s closing appeal—“advance, united ever more with Jesus and one another, toward the eternal dwelling”—parrots the universalist heresy condemned in Pope Pius XII’s Humani Generis: “They destroy the gratuity of the supernatural order” (n. 26). True eschatology warns that “many are called, but few are chosen” (Matthew 22:14), with Our Lady as the singular refuge of sinners only when they repent and confess.
Source:
Pope at Mass of Our Lady of Guadalupe: Mary brings joy where human joy is lacking (vaticannews.va)
Date: 12.12.2025