Neo-Modernist Cabal Masquerading as Ecclesial Governance
The Vatican News portal reports on 8 January 2026 that antipope Leo XIV concluded an “Extraordinary Consistory” with 170 cardinals, announcing annual gatherings to advance “synodality” and confirm the 2028 “Ecclesial Assembly.” Cardinals Brislin (South Africa), David (Philippines), and Rueda Aparicio (Colombia) praised the event’s “unity in diversity,” while antipope Leo invoked Vatican II as the foundation for this “renewal.” The article frames geopolitical concerns (e.g., Venezuela) and lay/women’s roles as central to the church’s mission, omitting all reference to the supernatural ends of the Church.
Vatican II: The Original Sin of Apostasy
The consistory’s cornerstone—the “continuity” with Vatican II—is a direct assault on Catholic dogma. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) condemned the very premise of conciliar “renewal”:
“The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error #80).
Antipope Leo’s appeal to Vatican II—which enshrined religious liberty (Dignitatis Humanæ), ecumenism (Unitatis Redintegratio), and collegiality—validates St. Pius X’s warning: Modernism is “the synthesis of all heresies” (Pascendi Dominici Gregis, 1907). By treating the Council as irreformable, the antipope and his cardinals reject the Church’s immutable magisterium, reducing it to a democratic process.
Synodality: A Masonic Subversion of Hierarchy
The cardinals’ celebration of “companions on the journey” and “non-technical synodality” exposes their contempt for Christ’s monarchical constitution of the Church. Pius VI’s Auctorem Fidei (1794) anathematized such egalitarian delusions:
“The proposition which establishes… an order instituted by Christ in the Church, by which the hierarchy and people coalesce into one body… is heretical.”
Collegiality, as promoted here, is not a legitimate exercise of episcopal fraternity but a Trojan horse for lay usurpation. Leo XIII’s Satis Cognitum (1896) affirms that the Church’s unity flows from Peter alone—not from committees or “listening sessions.”
Reduction of the Church’s Mission to Naturalistic Humanism
Cardinal Rueda Aparicio’s focus on Venezuela’s “geopolitics” and “human rights”—while ignoring the salvation of souls—exemplifies the neo-church’s apostasy. Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) declares:
“When men have denied or neglected… the rule of our Savior, human society has tottered to its fall.”
The consistory’s silence on the Social Kingship of Christ proves its adherence to the Masonic ideal of a secularized church. Instead of calling Venezuela to convert, these cardinals parrot UN-style “dialogue”—a betrayal of the Great Commission (Matt. 28:19).
Women’s “Ministries”: Heretical Innovation
Cardinal David’s endorsement of female “ministries” and the diaconate commission directly contradicts divine law. Paul VI’s Inter Insigniores (1976)—itself a modernist compromise—still admitted:
“The Church does not consider herself authorized to admit women to priestly ordination.”
True pre-1958 theology, however, goes further: Pius XII’s Sacra Virginitas (1954) praises women’s role within their God-ordained sphere—not as quasi-clerics. The cardinals’ feminist rhetoric aligns with Freemasonry’s war on the sacramental priesthood.
Methodology of Deception: Feelings Over Faith
The consistory’s “conversation in the Spirit” and emphasis on “mutual knowledge” are classic Modernist tactics. St. Pius X’s Lamentabili Sane (1907) condemned the notion that:
“Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him” (Error #58).
By prioritizing emotional “harmony” over doctrinal clarity, antipope Leo fosters a false unity that masks heresy. As Cardinal Rueda admits, this is “not uniformity”—code for tolerating blasphemies against the Faith.
Omission as Confession: The Silence That Screams Apostasy
Nowhere does the article mention:
– The Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, replaced by the neo-church’s anthropocentric liturgies.
– The necessity of the Catholic Faith for salvation (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus).
– Mortal sin, judgment, or hell—proof that this “church” preaches a false gospel of universalism.
Pius IX’s Quanto Conficiamur Moerore (1863) rebukes such silence:
“They are deceiving themselves who think that outside the Catholic Church… eternal salvation can be achieved.”
Conclusion: A Consistory of Apostates
This gathering—like all post-1958 “synods”—is a Satanic parody of ecclesial governance. True Catholics recognize no antipope, attend no Novus Ordo, and submit only to shepherds who uphold the Depositum Fidei. As Our Lord warned:
“By their fruits you will know them” (Matt. 7:16).
The fruits of this consistory? A church of man, for man—an abomination seated in the Vatican.
Source:
Pope Leo: Another Consistory in June; We will hold one every year (vaticannews.va)
Date: 08.01.2026