The Catholic News Agency portal (January 22, 2026) reports on Republican legislative efforts supporting pregnancy resource centers and restricting interstate abortions for minors ahead of the March for Life. The article quotes politicians emphasizing parental rights and state-level solutions while promoting incrementalist measures like HR 6945 (funding pregnancy centers through TANF) and SB 6 (requiring medical care for infants surviving abortions). Absent is any reference to Quas Primas’ mandate for Christ’s social reign or Pius IX’s condemnation of religious indifferentism in the Syllabus of Errors (1864).
Naturalism Replaces Supernatural Mission in “Pro-Life” Framework
The article reduces the Church’s fight against abortion to secular lobbying dressed in Christian rhetoric. Rep. Chris Smith’s statement—claiming pregnancy centers “affirm the breathtaking miracle of unborn life”—avoids declaring abortion an intrinsic evil demanding total abolition. This mirrors the conciliar sect’s betrayal of Casti Connubii (1930), wherein Pius XI condemned abortion as “the direct murder of the innocent” without exception. By focusing on resource centers rather than demanding legal prohibition, legislators implicitly accept abortion’s legitimacy—a position anathematized by Canon 2350 §1 of the 1917 Code.
Kristan Hawkins’ call to “love them both” (mother and child) ignores the ultima ratio of Catholic action: the subjugation of civil law to divine law. As Pius IX taught in Quanta Cura (1864), states permitting sins like abortion “act against the laws and dictates of natural justice.” The proposed Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act (HR 4964) exemplifies this failure, treating parental consent as sufficient rather than demanding prosecution of abortionists as accomplices to homicide.
Omission of Magisterial Condemnations Signals Doctrinal Apostasy
Nowhere does the article cite the Church’s infallible teachings on abortion’s malum in se character. Senator Lankford’s SB 6—penalizing neglect of infants born after abortions—avoids labeling abortion itself as homicide punishable by excommunication (Codex Iuris Canonici 1917, Can. 2350 §1). This silence echoes Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae §14, which weakened doctrine by suggesting contraception—not just abortion—violates life. Such omissions confirm the conciliar sect’s complicity in the culture of death.
The legislation’s emphasis on federalism (“allowing states to use TANF funds”) contradicts Leo XIII’s Immortale Dei (1885): “Civil authority must not serve the majority’s will but divine order.” By accepting state-level compromises, Republicans normalize abortion’s legality—a stance Pius XI condemned as “cooperation with evil” (Divini Redemptoris §58).
Sacramental Desert in the Conciliar Sect’s “Pro-Life” Theater
The article’s focus on legislative tactics reveals a naturalistic worldview antithetical to Catholicism. Not once does it mention prayer, penance, or the Mass as essential weapons against abortion—contrary to Pius V’s Quo Primum, which codified excommunication for those obstructing the Traditional Latin Mass, the primary means of societal sanctification. Pregnancy centers praised as alternatives to abortion are worthless if they do not convert mothers to the integral Catholic faith, including rejection of Vatican II’s religious liberty heresy (Dignitatis Humanae).
Rep. Hinson’s bill (HR 6359)—requiring colleges to support pregnant students—fails to demand expulsion of professors promoting contraception, as mandated by Pius XI’s Divini Illius Magistri §40. Such half-measures confirm the conciliar sect’s paralysis: a pseudo-Church incapable of wielding the spiritual sword (Eph. 6:17) against modernity’s errors.
Theological Vacuum in Pro-Life Rhetoric
Quotes from politicians and activists lack any reference to Christ’s kingship over nations—the foundation of authentic pro-life work. As Pius XI declared in Quas Primas §18: “Nations will find tranquility only when they submit to Christ’s scepter.” The article’s celebration of March for Life—an event recognizing the legitimacy of pro-abortion civil authorities—betrays the Faith. True Catholics must boycott such events, which implicitly endorse the U.S. regime’s divine right to exist despite permitting child sacrifice.
The absence of calls for abortionists’ excommunication or demands for public repentance by pro-abortion politicians reveals the conciliar sect’s impotence. St. Pius X’s Vehementer Nos (1906) mandated: “Catholics cannot vote for candidates supporting intrinsic evils.” Yet the article praises Republicans while omitting their failures—like supporting IVF (another grave evil)—proving their “pro-life” stance is electoral theater.
Conclusion: Legislative Charades Cannot Mask Doctrinal Bankruptcy
These legislative efforts—however well-intentioned—are spiritually sterile without unconditional submission to Catholic Tradition. Until the conciliar sect demands abortion’s total criminalization and society’s submission to Christ the King, its “pro-life” posturing remains a dangerous illusion, distracting souls from the only solution: restoration of the Social Reign of Christ through the Consecration of Russia and the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart—truths suppressed by the Fatima counterfeiters.
Source:
Pro-life legislative action ramps up ahead of March for Life (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 22.01.2026