Leo XIV’s Naturalistic Distortion of the Pro-Life Witness
The Catholic News Agency portal (January 22, 2026) reports that antipope Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”) addressed the 2026 March for Life, urging participants to foster a society that “safeguards the sanctity of human life” through “dialogue with civil and political leaders.” The article emphasizes his “spiritual closeness” to the event and recalls his alleged participation in early marches. This message, framed as unprecedented papal support, epitomizes the conciliar sect’s reduction of Catholic morality to secular activism devoid of divine mandate.
Illegitimate Authority Masquerading as Shepherds
The article’s reference to Prevost as “Holy Father” constitutes blasphemy against Pastor Aeternus (Vatican I), which teaches that the Roman Pontiff derives authority from Christ alone, not electoral ceremonies staged by modernists. St. Robert Bellarmine’s De Romano Pontifice (II.30) clarifies that manifest heretics—such as those denying the Social Kingship of Christ—“ipso facto cease to be Pope or head of the Church.” Prevost’s participation in past marches holds no theological weight, as apostates cannot validly govern the Church (Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Paul IV).
Human Rights Over Divine Law: A Masonic Subversion
Prevost’s assertion that life’s protection is “the indispensable foundation of every other human right” inverts Catholic order. Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) declares Christ’s reign as the sine qua non for societal justice: “Nations will find no peace until they submit to the sweet yoke of Our Lord.” By prioritizing “dialogue with civil leaders” over proclaiming their duty to enforce divine law (Ps 2:10-12), the message reduces the pro-life cause to political negotiation—a betrayal of the Church’s mission to “teach all nations” (Mt 28:19).
The Omission of Christ’s Kingship and Final Judgment
Nowhere does Prevost mention repentance, the Four Last Things, or the imperative for states to recognize Christ as King. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) condemns the idea that “the Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55). The article’s praise for Prevost’s “courageous and peaceful march” ignores that true Catholic action demands public submission to Christ’s authority—not mere protest signs. St. Augustine’s City of God (XIX.17) warns that societies rejecting this submission become “robber bands” devoid of justice.
Naturalism Disguised as Piety
The appeal to “serve him in the least of our brothers and sisters” distorts Matthew 25:40 by divorcing charity from doctrinal integrity. St. Pius X’s Lamentabili Sane (1907) condemns modernist reductions of faith to “human consciousness evolving with time” (Proposition 22). Prevost’s “apostolic blessing” is sacrilegious, as apostates cannot confer valid sacraments (Council of Trent, Session VII). The article’s focus on Prevost’s U.S. origin further exposes the conciliar sect’s nationalistic syncretism, condemned by Pius XI in Mortalium Animos (1928).
A Call to True Catholic Action
Authentic defense of life requires restoring Christ’s Social Kingship, not begging secular states for concessions. As Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre declared in 1988: “One cannot claim to defend life while kneeling before the destroyers of life.” The article’s silence on these principles confirms the conciliar sect’s complicity in naturalizing Catholic witness—a heresy foretold in Our Lady of La Salette’s prophecy: “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist.”
Source:
Pope Leo XIV sends message to March for Life 2026 (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 22.01.2026