Thai Prelates’ Democratic Delusions Expose Post-Conciliar Apostasy


Thai Prelates’ Democratic Delusions Expose Post-Conciliar Apostasy

The VaticanNews portal (January 28, 2026) reports that the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Thailand (CBCT) issued a pastoral letter urging Catholics to vote in February 8 general elections as a “moral force.” Archbishop Francis Xavier Vira Arpondratana claims voting constitutes a “moral obligation” based on the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Compendium of the Social Doctrine, while warning against reducing democracy to procedural rules. The document cites Exodus 18:21 and Luke 16:10-11 to advocate selecting “incorruptible” leaders, yet remains silent on the Social Kingship of Christ. This modernist manifesto exemplifies the conciliar sect’s wholesale surrender to naturalism.


Naturalism Masquerading as Moral Guidance

The Thai prelates ground their electoral exhortations in two post-conciliar texts: the 1992 Catechism and 2004 Compendium – both modernist documents contradicting pre-1958 magisterium. Archbishop Vira’s claim that “voting is a moral obligation for the common good” constitutes theological rebellion against Pope Pius IX’s condemnation of religious liberty in Syllabus Errorum (1864): “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” (Error 15). The Syllabus explicitly condemns the notion that “the Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55).

By urging participation in Thailand’s pluralist democracy, the CBCT embraces the condemned error that “the Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Syllabus, Error 80). Their appeal to Exodus 18:21 (“select capable, God-fearing leaders”) is spiritually adulterated when divorced from Psalm 2:10-12: “Serve the Lord with fear… embrace discipline lest you perish from the just way.” Nowhere do the bishops demand Catholic leaders govern according to Regnum Christi, instead accepting the Masonic lie that “human dignity” and “human rights” can exist apart from submission to Christ the King.

The Omission That Condemns

Nowhere does this pastoral letter mention Pope Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas (1925), which established Christ’s social kingship: “Nations will be happy and peaceful only when individuals and governments submit to the sweet dominion of Christ” (§19). The Thai bishops’ silence on this dogma exposes their adherence to the conciliar revolution. Pius XI warned that societies rejecting Christ’s reign become “shaken, tottering, and doomed to fall” (§22), precisely the condition of Thailand’s Buddhist-dominated government.

These modernist clerics commit the condemned error of “reducing the Church’s mission to the confines of a mere humanism” (Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis, §3). Their vision of Catholics as “moral force” reduces the Church to NGO status, discarding Her divine mandate to “teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19). The Lamentabili Sane (1907) condemned this exact naturalism: “Revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God” (Error 20).

Democracy as Disguised Apostasy

The CBCT’s claim that “true democracy arises from acceptance of fundamental values like human dignity” directly contradicts Pope Leo XIII’s teaching in Immortale Dei (1885): “No one of the several forms of government is in itself condemned… provided it be of a kind to secure the welfare of citizens. But, as to which of these forms is to be preferred, this is not a matter on which the Church pronounces” (§36). The bishops invert doctrine by making democracy itself the ideal rather than a circumstantial means to achieve Catholic governance.

When Archbishop Vira warns democracy risks becoming “disguised dictatorship,” he unwittingly describes his own conciliar sect. The true “disguised dictatorship” is Vatican II’s Dignitatis Humanae, which imposes religious indifferentism as dogma – a heresy condemned by Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832) as “the absurd and erroneous maxim claiming freedom of conscience must be asserted and guaranteed to everyone.” Thai prelates become complicit in this dictatorship by urging Catholic participation in a system constitutionally opposed to Unam Sanctam‘s teaching that “it is necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff” (Boniface VIII, 1302).

Rubber-Stamping Revolution

The bishops’ superficial condemnation of “vote-buying and electoral fraud” fails to address the root evil: Thailand’s constitutional mandate for Buddhist monarchy. Their call for “virtuous leaders” is meaningless without demanding conversion to Catholicism – the only path to virtue. St. Augustine’s City of God (Book IV, Ch. 4) demolishes their position: “Without justice, what are kingdoms but great robberies?” Thailand’s government constitutes institutionalized robbery of Christ’s royal rights.

This pastoral letter embodies the modernist cancer diagnosed in Pascendi §39: “They teach that the Church must adapt herself to civil progress… to the end that she may be as a leaven and, as it were, the soul of civil society.” The Thai bishops have become leaven for Thailand’s Buddhist dough – exactly the syncretism Pius XI condemned when warning against “false peace which deceives the unwary” (Quas Primas §33). Their final prayer for “true peace, justice, and fraternity” mocks the Pax Christi, which can only exist “under the sweet dominion of Christ” (Quas Primas §1).

Non Possumus

Catholics cannot participate in Thailand’s electoral farce without betraying Christ the King. The CBCT’s document constitutes formal cooperation with the conciliar sect’s apostasy from the Social Reign of Christ. When Pius XII warned that “the day the Church doubts, She will cease to be Herself” (Radio Message, 1946), he foresaw these very shepherds who doubt so profoundly that they urge flocks into pagan political systems. Authentic Catholics respond with the martyrs of Nagasaki: “We cannot” (非ず – Nazu). Let Thai faithful remember the Cristeros’ cry: “¡Viva Cristo Rey!” – not “Viva Democracy!


Source:
​​Thai Bishops call Catholics to act as ‘moral force’ in upcoming polls
  (vaticannews.va)
Date: 28.01.2026

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.