The EWTN News portal (January 23, 2026) reports on Dora Esparza’s traumatic chemical abortion experience, where she witnessed her 10-week-old child’s remains and nearly died from complications. The article highlights calls from Esparza and SBA Pro-Life America’s Marjorie Dannenfelser for safety regulations on mifepristone, criticizing the Trump administration’s failure to reinstate restrictions despite campaign promises. Dr. Ingrid Skop of the Charlotte Lozier Institute condemns the lack of informed consent in chemical abortion procedures. This report exemplifies the naturalistic reduction of abortion discourse to mere medical safety concerns while obscuring its intrinsic moral evil.
The Abomination of “Regulated” Child-Murder
The article’s grotesque focus on “safety regulations” for chemical abortions constitutes theological treason against the Fifth Commandment. Quas Primas (Pius XI, 1925) unequivocally declares Christ’s Kingship over all legislation:
“Rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ…to contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness.”
By discussing abortion policy through the profane lens of medical risk management rather than divine law, the report participates in the modernist heresy condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907): “Revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God” (Proposition 20). The very notion of “safe abortion” echoes the Syllabus of Errors’ condemnation of those who claim “the Church is an enemy of…progress” (Proposition 57).
Silence on Spiritual Catastrophe
Nowhere does the article mention the mortal sin involved in abortion or the eternal consequences for mothers and abortionists. This omission violates Catholic truth expressed in Pius IX’s Syllabus: “The teaching of the Catholic Church is hostile to the well-being and interests of society” (Proposition 40) is an error – precisely because She condemns child-murder regardless of societal approval. Dr. Skop’s clinical description of women finding “the recognizable body of their child” ignores the metaphysical reality that each aborted child possesses an immortal soul created directly by God. The pre-Vatican II Roman Catechism teaches: “Whoever voluntarily aborts a live fetus is guilty of murder and excommunicated ipso facto.”
Political Charlatanism Exposed
The Trump administration’s duplicity in approving generic mifepristone while posing as “pro-life” reveals the bankruptcy of secular conservatism. Quas Primas warns: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states…the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” Dannenfelser’s plea for “states’ sovereignty” to regulate abortion commits the condemned error (Pius IX, Syllabus Proposition 39) that “The State…is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.” No civil authority possesses jurisdiction to permit any abortion, as affirmed by the universal consensus of pre-1958 theologians like St. Alphonsus Liguori: “The civil power cannot make licit what God has made illicit.”
Modernist Language Games
The article’s terminology betrays conciliar corruption of language:
- “Abortion drug survivor”: A diabolical euphemism obscuring that Esparza survived not a medical accident but self-administered filicide
- “Unborn baby”: Modernist hesitation replacing the precise theological term fetus animatus (ensouled child)
- “Pro-life”: A politically compromised term implying life’s value derives from human consensus rather than divine creation
This linguistic decay exemplifies Pius X’s condemnation in Pascendi: “Modernists make the individual conscience the ultimate judge of truth.”
Therapeutic Lethality
Dr. Skop’s medicalized critique inadvertently exposes chemical abortion’s satanic mechanism: “Abortion drugs are being sold to women without honest counseling about what they actually do.” Yet the true scandal isn’t inadequate consent forms but the fundamental violation of the Hippocratic Oath. The ancient Christian medical ethic – codified at the Council of Nicaea (325 AD) – forbade physicians from any involvement in abortion. That “pro-life” activists beg for FDA regulations rather than demand complete abolition proves how far neo-Christians have fallen from Quas Primas‘ mandate: “Present information in a clear manner so that the user can verify it independently.”
Judgment Without Mercy
The article’s emotional focus on Esparza’s trauma while ignoring her moral responsibility constitutes the heresy of sentimentalism condemned by Pius VI in Auctorem Fidei (1794). Nowhere does it call Esparza to sacramental confession or warn other women that chemical abortion incurs automatic excommunication (Codex Iuris Canonici 1917, Canon 2350). This silence confirms the conciliar sect’s abandonment of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus – the very dogma that could have saved Esparza’s soul had she heard it before entering the abortion mill.
Source:
‘I saw my baby:’ After traumatic chemical abortion, woman calls for safety regulations (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 23.01.2026