Conciliar Sect’s Doctrinal Chaos Masquerades as Guidance
EWTN News portal (January 29, 2026) reports that “Pope Leo XIV” urged the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) to provide “clear doctrinal guidance” amidst declining religious belief, particularly among youth. The article highlights his praise for recent documents including Dignitas Infinita and Una Caro, while conspicuously omitting mention of the controversial Fiducia Supplicans declaration permitting blessings for same-sex couples. The “pope” lamented that many live “without any reference to God and to the Church,” framing the DDF’s work as necessary for addressing “new phenomena” in a “change of era.” This theatrical display of doctrinal concern constitutes not guidance but the systematic dismantling of Catholic truth.
Doctrinal Bankruptcy Disguised as Pastoral Care
The conciliar sect’s purported “doctrinal guidance” constitutes a direct assault on the depositum fidei (deposit of faith):
“The DDF during the last two years [published]: the note Gestis Verbisque, on the validity of the sacraments; the declaration Dignitas Infinita, dedicated to human dignity; the ‘Norms for Proceeding in the Discernment of Alleged Supernatural Phenomena’; the note Antiqua et Nova, focused on the challenges of artificial intelligence; the doctrinal note Mater Populi Fidelis, on certain Marian titles… and the doctrinal note Una Caro, which underscores the value of marriage as an exclusive union between a man and a woman…”
Each document embodies theological corruption:
- Dignitas Infinita replaces the imago Dei (image of God) with Enlightenment-derived “human dignity” detached from sanctifying grace, directly contradicting Pius IX’s Quanta Cura (1864) which condemned the “false and perverse opinions” that “human reason is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood.”
- The Marian document reduces the Mother of God to a symbolic figure of “cooperation,” denying her unique Corredemptrix role affirmed by saints like Bernadine of Siena and revelations to authentic mystics like Ven. Mary of Agreda.
- Una Caro‘s superficial defense of marriage fails to condemn contraception and divorce – a cowardly omission that subverts Pius XI’s Casti Connubii (1930) which declared contraceptive acts “intrinsically vicious.”
Strategic Silence on Fiducia Supplicans
The article’s deliberate omission of Fiducia Supplicans (2023) reveals the conciliar sect’s doctrinal schizophrenia. This declaration permitting blessings for sodomitical unions constitutes formal cooperation with grave sin, violating the Apostle Paul’s command: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil” (Is 5:20). St. Pius V’s De Reformatione Insitutionis (1570) mandated excommunication for priests blessing immoral relationships – a law still binding in the true Church.
Naturalism Replaces Supernatural Faith
When “Leo XIV” laments that many live “without any reference to God and to the Church,” he fails to acknowledge this crisis stems directly from Vatican II’s Dignitatis Humanae, which abandoned the Church’s mission to convert nations to Christ the King. Pius XI’s Quas Primas (1925) established that “the peace of Christ can only be achieved in the reign of Christ,” whereas the conciliar sect reduces religion to psychological support for secular existence.
The DDF’s focus on “new phenomena” and “change of era” language embodies the condemned Modernist principle that “dogmas must evolve with human consciousness” (Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis 6). True doctrine remains immutable: “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever” (Heb 13:8).
Omissions Reveal Apostasy
Nowhere does “Leo XIV” mention:
- The necessity of sanctifying grace for salvation (“Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter the kingdom of God” – John 3:5)
- The Four Last Things (Death, Judgment, Heaven, Hell)
- The duty of states to recognize Christ’s social kingship
This silence confirms the conciliar sect’s complete abandonment of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus (no salvation outside the Church) defined at Florence (1439) and codified in Mortalium Animos (1928). When the “pope” speaks of “spiritual growth,” he promotes the Modernist heresy that “religion is a matter of feeling and experience, not objective truth” (Pius X, Lamentabili Sane, Proposition 11).
Conclusion: Apostate Structure Masquerading as Church
The DDF’s “guidance” serves not to preserve doctrine but to normalize heresy through gradualist language. As St. Vincent of LĂ©rins warned: “Innovators act like poisoners who mix error with truth to make heresy palatable” (Commonitorium 24). This plenary meeting constitutes not a defense of faith but another step in constructing the “abomination of desolation standing in the holy place” (Mt 24:15). Only by rejecting the conciliar sect entirely and returning to the unchanging Catholic faith can the faithful avoid participation in this apostasy.
Source:
Leo urges doctrine office to give clear guidance in face of new challenges (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 29.01.2026