EWTN News reports (January 21, 2026) that antipope Leo XIV’s secretary of state, “Cardinal” Pietro Parolin, confirmed the Vatican’s consideration of joining former U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza reconstruction. This initiative, involving nations like the United Arab Emirates, Israel, and Hungary, seeks to create an alternative to the United Nations while requiring financial contributions for permanent membership. Parolin stated the Vatican would not contribute financially but might participate in a “different” capacity, emphasizing the need to reduce U.S.-Europe tensions and “respect international law.” This overture exemplifies the conciliar sect’s wholesale abandonment of Catholicism’s supernatural mission.
Subordination of Divine Law to Secular Power Structures
The very notion of a “Board of Peace” reduces peace to a bureaucratic exercise divorced from the Kingship of Christ. Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas (1925) dogmatically declares: “When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony.” By contrast, Trump’s board—composed largely of Muslim-majority nations and secular states—operates on the naturalistic fallacy that peace emerges from geopolitical maneuvering rather than the conversion of nations to the One True Faith.
Parolin’s claim that “respecting international law” could resolve conflicts ignores Pius IX’s condemnation in the Syllabus of Errors (1864): “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error #80). The conciliar sect’s alignment with this condemned proposition is evident in its readiness to collaborate with regimes that persecute Christians (e.g., Egypt, where Copts face systemic violence) and promote religious indifferentism (e.g., UAE’s “Abrahamic Family House” syncretism).
Betrayal of the Church’s Mission to Convert Nations
Nowhere does Parolin mention the sine qua non of lasting peace: the submission of all governments to the Social Reign of Christ the King. The apostate Vatican’s silence on this dogma—defined infallibly at Trent and reaffirmed by Pius XI—exposes its complicity in the modernist heresy condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane (1907): “The Christian doctrine was originally Judaic, but through successive evolutions it became first Pauline, then Joannine, finally Hellenic and universal” (Error #60). By treating Islam and Judaism as equal partners in peacebuilding, the conciliar sect implicitly denies Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19).
This board’s financial mechanism—where nations “buy” influence—further illustrates the neo-church’s embrace of usurious capitalism condemned by Leo XIII in Rerum Novarum (1891). Parolin’s assurance that the Vatican won’t contribute funds changes nothing: mere participation legitimizes a Masonic-inspired global governance structure antithetical to Catholic monarchy. Recall that Freemasonry’s core aim—the destruction of Christendom—is advanced through such “interfaith dialogue” platforms, as Pius VIII warned in Traditi Humilitati (1829).
Theological Implications of Collaboration with Schismatics and Heretics
The conciliar sect’s potential alliance with Israel—a state founded on Zionist heresy—constitutes formal cooperation with those who reject the Messiah. St. Pius X’s Vehementer Nos (1906) forbids any action implying “that the Church… can become the plaything of human factions.” Yet antipope Leo XIV’s regime openly treats the Holy Land—rightfully belonging to Christ the King—as a geopolitical bargaining chip. Similarly, Hungary’s participation under Viktor Orbán, despite his facade of “Christian conservatism,” changes nothing: his recognition of the Vatican II sect proves he serves the Revolution.
Parolin’s concern over U.S.-Europe tensions reveals the neo-church’s obsession with worldly stability over spiritual warfare. True Catholics recall St. Augustine’s distinction: the “peace of Babylon” (mere absence of conflict) versus the “Peace of Christ” (tranquility in order). When the conciliar sect frets over Trump’s Greenland comments or “international law,” it mimics the Jewish leaders who begged Christ to silence His preaching lest it provoke Rome (John 11:48). This cowardice flows from the loss of faith: having denied the Kingship of Christ, the Vatican bureaucrats can only echo Pilate’s question—”What is truth?” (John 18:38)—while appeasing earthly powers.
Conclusion: Return to the Kingship of Christ or Perish
Antipope Leo XIV’s potential participation in this “Board of Peace” completes Vatican II’s betrayal of Catholic mission. As the conciliar sect chases relevance in Davos-esque talking shops, faithful Catholics cling to Pius XI’s immutable teaching: “Nations will be happy and peaceful only when they accept the rule of our Divine Redeemer and obey His commandments” (Quas Primas). Until the Vatican hierarchy repudiates modernism and submits to Tradition, its every utterance remains but another brick in Babel’s tower—a monument to man’s pride, destined for collapse.
Source:
Vatican weighing Trump invitation to join Gaza ‘Board of Peace’ (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 21.01.2026