SSPX-Vatican Dialogue Exposes Schismatic Compromise
Vatican News portal (February 5, 2026) reports an upcoming “informal and personal dialogue” between Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) leader Davide Pagliarani and “Cardinal” VÃctor Manuel Fernández of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith. The pretext is to “avoid rifts” regarding SSPX’s planned July 1 episcopal ordinations, which the Vatican claims require its approval. SSPX justifies the ordinations due to Rome’s failure to address their “particular necessity,” admitting the Vatican’s response “in no way responds to our requests.”
Illegitimate Dicastery Seeks to Subvert Divine Law
The so-called Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith—formerly the Holy Office—now operates as an engine of modernist heresy, having abandoned its sacred mandate to defend immutable truth. Fernández, architect of the blasphemous declaration Fiducia Supplicans (2023), personifies the apostate hierarchy’s war against Catholic doctrine. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors condemns such dialogues that imply equality between truth and error: “Error has no rights” (Prop. 15, 77). By negotiating with SSPX, the Vatican advances its relativist agenda, treating schismatics as “ecclesial partners” rather than souls to be reclaimed through repentance.
SSPX’s Contradictory Capitulation
SSPX’s insistence on “ministry continuity” via illicit ordinations reveals its theological bankruptcy. While claiming to resist conciliar reforms, it acknowledges the Vatican’s jurisdiction by seeking approval—a violation of Pope Pius XII’s Sacramentum Ordinis (1947), which reserves episcopal appointments to the Holy See. Lefebvre’s 1988 consecrations, though sinful, at least defied modernist usurpers openly; today’s SSPX oscillates between rebellion and submission, embodying ecclesia supplet fantasies. As Pope Leo XIII warned: “Unity can only be maintained by submission to the Apostolic See” (Satis Cognitum, 1896)—a See SSPX itself admits is occupied by heretics.
Silence on the Supernatural Betrays Apostasy
The article’s bureaucratic language—”effective tools for discussion,” “positive results”—omits all reference to salvation, grace, or Christ’s Kingship. This naturalistic framing reduces the Church to a human institution negotiating terms, contradicting Pius XI’s encyclical Quas Primas (1925): “The Church cannot submit to human governments in the exercise of her God-given mandate” (§18). SSPX’s complicity in this charade confirms its alignment with the conciliar sect’s horizontalism, which St. Pius X condemned as “the synthesis of all heresies” (Pascendi Dominici Gregis, §39).
A Schism Within a Schism
SSPX’s planned Flavigny-sur-Ozerain ordinations expose its incoherent ecclesiology. By appealing to “necessity” while begging recognition from modernists, it denies the sedevacantist conclusion demanded by logic. Canon 188.4 (1917 Code) states that heretics automatically forfeit office, making Fernández’s dicastery a nullity. True Catholics recognize no “dialogue” with usurpers, only the duty to resist them unto martyrdom (St. Athanasius, History of the Arians, Ch. 4). SSPX’s middle path—rejecting Vatican II but courting its architects—proves it is a puppet of the very apostasy it pretends to oppose.
Source:
Meeting scheduled between Society of St. Pius X and Prefect of the DDF (vaticannews.va)
Date: 05.02.2026