The Apostasy of the Conciliar Sect Manifested in a Single Appointment
Summary of the Factual Event
The Vatican News portal reports that on February 13, 2026, the antipope known as “Pope Leo XIV” (Robert Prevost) appointed Sister Nina Benedikta Krapić, M.V.Z., as Deputy Director of the Holy See Press Office, effective March 1, 2026. She replaces Cristiane Murray. Sister Krapić, born in 1989, holds a law degree, a specialization in Public Relations, and is pursuing a doctorate in Social Sciences at the Pontifical Gregorian University. She made perpetual vows in 2023 and has worked in communications for Caritas and the Dicastery for Communication. The Prefect of the Dicastery for Communication, Paolo Ruffini, expressed thanks to the outgoing deputy and confidence in the new appointee’s “professional and human qualities.” This event, presented as routine administrative news, is in fact a stark manifestation of the theological and ecclesiological revolution that has seized the structures occupying the Vatican since the death of Pope Pius XII.
1. Factual Deconstruction: The Illegitimacy of the Source and the Act
The entire report emanates from the “Holy See Press Office” and “Vatican News,” organs of the conciliar sect. The use of the title “Pope” for Robert Prevost is a fundamental lie. As proven by theological authority, a manifest heretic cannot be Pope. The line of antipopes began with Angelo Roncalli (“John XXIII”), who embraced the errors of Modernism condemned by St. Pius X. The appointment itself is an act of a private individual, not a valid Roman Pontiff. Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law, which remains in force unless legitimately abrogated (which it has not been by a valid Pontiff), states that an office becomes vacant *ipso facto* by “publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” The conciliar “popes,” from John XXIII through Francis and now Prevost, have publicly defected by promulgating the documents of Vatican II, which are permeated with the very errors condemned in *Lamentabili sane exitu* and the *Syllabus of Errors*. Therefore, Prevost holds no office and his “appointments” are null and void. The “Dicastery for Communication” is a conciliar invention, replacing the legitimate Roman Curia with a structure designed for the propagation of the “errors of the age” (Pius IX, *Syllabus*, Error 19).
2. Linguistic and Rhetorical Analysis: The Language of Naturalism and Professionalism
The article’s tone is bureaucratic, managerial, and secular. It employs the vocabulary of corporate human resources: “appointed,” “Deputy Director,” “stepping down,” “professionalism,” “best wishes for fruitful work,” “great professional and human qualities.” This is the language of a non-governmental organization or a media corporation, not the language of the *Mystical Body of Christ*. The sacred language of the *sacra potestas* (sacred power), of apostolic succession, of divine institution, is entirely absent. This linguistic shift is not neutral; it is the symptom of a profound apostasy. The Church, according to Pius XI in *Quas Primas*, is a “perfect society” established by Christ with a divine mission to teach, govern, and lead to eternal happiness. Her governance is pastoral and sacramental, not managerial. The focus on “communications,” “public relations,” and “social sciences” reveals a complete subordination of the Church’s supernatural end to naturalistic, worldly methods. The article remains utterly silent on the spiritual qualifications required for such a role—doctrinal orthodoxy, sanctity, loyalty to the *depositum fidei*. This silence is the gravest accusation, proving that for the neo-church, the administration of the “Vatican” is a matter of public relations and social engineering, not of souls.
3. Theological Confrontation: The Errors Condemned by Pius IX and Pius X
The appointment of a woman to a position of significant authority and influence in the “Holy See Press Office” is a direct violation of the Church’s constant tradition and law. The *Syllabus of Errors* condemns the following propositions, which are embodied in this act:
* **Error 27:** “The sacred ministers of the Church and the Roman pontiff are to be absolutely excluded from every charge and dominion over temporal affairs.” The Press Office is a *temporal* administrative office dealing with media and public perception. While not “temporal” in the civil sense, it is a governance function. The appointment of a woman, who cannot receive Holy Orders, to a leadership role in this governance structure confuses the natural and supernatural orders and erodes the hierarchical, sacramental structure willed by Christ.
* **Error 54:** “Kings and princes are not only exempt from the jurisdiction of the Church, but are superior to the Church in deciding questions of jurisdiction.” This error is mirrored in the conciliar sect’s adoption of democratic and professional models for Church governance, where “expertise” in communications or law supersedes sacramental authority and canonical fitness. The “Prefect” (a layman) praises the “professional qualities” of the religious sister, establishing a paradigm where worldly competence is the primary criterion, not divine vocation and hierarchical obedience.
* **Error 19:** “The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church…” The conciliar sect, by adopting the structures and language of modern corporations and international bodies, implicitly accepts that the Church must conform to modern secular standards of “governance,” “diversity,” and “inclusion,” thus surrendering her divine right to self-govern according to her own laws.
* **Error 48:** “Catholics may approve of the system of educating youth unconnected with Catholic faith and the power of the Church…” Sister Krapić’s specialization in “Public Relations” and her doctorate in “Social Sciences” at a pontifical university that has been thoroughly modernized, represents an education steeped in the naturalistic, relativistic principles condemned by Pius IX. Her previous work with “women victims of domestic violence and other marginalized individuals” is a praiseworthy natural charity, but it is presented as her primary qualification, overshadowing any explicit formation in Thomistic philosophy, dogmatic theology, or canon law.
Furthermore, the very concept of a “Deputy Director” of a Vatican office is an innovation. The Roman Curia, as constituted before the revolution, was composed of Cardinals, Archbishops, and Bishops, with Monsignori in supporting roles. The feminization and professionalization of the Vatican’s central administration is a clear sign of the “abomination of desolation” standing in the holy place—the replacement of the hierarchical, sacerdotal structure of the Church with a secular, administrative, and often feminized model, designed for dialogue with the world rather than for the salvation of souls.
4. Symptomatic Analysis: The Conciliar Revolution’s Logical Outcome
This appointment is not an anomaly; it is the logical fruit of the conciliar revolution. Vatican II’s *Gaudium et Spes* embraced the “signs of the times” and advocated for the Church’s “collaboration” with the world in every field. The post-conciliar “reform” of the Curia, culminating in *Praedicate Evangelium*, explicitly opens all offices to “any baptized person,” regardless of sex or ordination status. This is the institutionalization of the error condemned by Pius IX: the subordination of the Church’s supernatural mission to the naturalistic goals of “human progress” and “social welfare.”
The focus on “communications” is particularly telling. The neo-church understands that its survival depends not on doctrinal purity or sacramental grace, but on media management, public relations, and the crafting of a palatable image. The appointment of a young, educated woman with a background in law and PR is a calculated move to project an image of “modernity,” “openness,” and “inclusivity” to the secular world. This is the exact opposite of the Church’s mission as defined by Pius XI: “to render public veneration to the Lord’s Kingship,” which requires the state and all human institutions to recognize Christ’s authority and conform to His laws. The neo-church, by contrast, seeks the world’s approval by mirroring its structures and values.
The appointment also fits the pattern of the “feminization” of the post-conciliar church, a phenomenon noted by critics as a departure from the masculine, hierarchical model of the Church founded by Christ. This is not about the dignity of women—which the Church has always exalted in its female saints and religious—but about the usurpation of roles that belong by divine law to the sacred hierarchy. It is a symptom of the loss of faith in the supernatural, where the “apostolate” is redefined as “professional service” and “witness” is reduced to “visibility” and “communication.”
5. The Omitted Supernatural: The Silence on Salvation and Dogma
The article is a masterpiece of naturalistic omission. It speaks of “service,” “professionalism,” “qualities,” “communications,” “Caritas.” It does not mention:
* The *Deposit of Faith*.
* The necessity of grace.
* The Sacrifice of the Mass.
* The threat of eternal damnation.
* The absolute necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation (*Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus*).
* The Kingship of Christ over individuals, families, and states (*Quas Primas*).
* The duty of the Church to condemn error and proselytize.
This silence is not accidental; it is doctrinal. The neo-church, having embraced the indifferentism condemned by Pius IX (Errors 15-17), no longer believes it has a unique, salvific message to proclaim. Its mission is reduced to “dialogue,” “accompaniment,” and “witness” in a manner indistinguishable from a secular humanitarian NGO. The Press Office’s role is to manage the narrative, not to thunder forth the *syllabus errorum* against the modern world. The appointment of a deputy director focused on “social sciences” and “public relations” perfectly encapsulates this apostasy: the Church, in the conciliar conception, is a player in the social sphere, not the sole arbiter of truth and morality.
6. The Sedevacantist Perspective: A Church Without a Pope
From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, which holds that the See of Peter is vacant due to the manifest heresy of the post-1958 claimants, this event is the administrative update of a private association occupying the Vatican. The arguments of St. Robert Bellarmine, cited in the provided file on sedevacantism, are decisive: a manifest heretic *ipso facto* loses all jurisdiction. The “Pope” who made this appointment is a heretic, as demonstrated by his participation in the conciliar cult and his endorsement of the errors of *Lamentabili* and the *Syllabus*. Therefore, the “Holy See Press Office” is a misnomer. It is the press office of a sect. The appointment of Sister Krapić is a sectarian administrative act, devoid of any supernatural authority or efficacy. It has no more bearing on the true Catholic Church, which subsists in those who hold the integral faith and are not in communication with the conciliar hierarchy, than the appointment of a press secretary by the Grand Orient of Freemasons would have on the Church.
Conclusion: The Reign of Antichrist Prepares the Way
The appointment of Sister Nina Krapić is a microcosm of the great apostasy. It demonstrates:
1. The **feminization and professionalization** of Church governance, replacing the hierarchical, sacerdotal structure with a secular, managerial model.
2. The **subordination of supernatural ends to naturalistic methods**, where “communications” and “public relations” are valued above doctrine and sacraments.
3. The **silence on dogma and salvation**, focusing instead on worldly “service” and “marginalized individuals.”
4. The **illegitimacy of the entire conciliar structure**, from the antipope down to the dicasteries, which are instruments of the neo-church’s naturalistic and modernist agenda.
5. The **fulfillment of the prophecies** of St. Pius X regarding the “enemies within” and the synthesis of all heresies—Modernism—which seeks to destroy the Church from within by changing her nature, mission, and governance.
This is not a “news item” to be noted passively. It is a stark warning. The conciliar sect is not merely “erroneous” in some points; it is a **systemic apostasy**, a **paramasonic structure** (as the analysis of the Fatima operation suggests) designed to lead souls away from the necessity of the Catholic faith and the reign of Christ the King. The faithful are called to reject this entire system, to have no part in its “liturgies,” its “hierarchies,” or its “appointments,” and to cling to the immutable Faith of all time, which alone can save souls in these days of unprecedented deception.
Source:
Pope appoints Sr. Nina Krapić as new Deputy Director of Holy See Press Office (vaticannews.va)
Date: 13.02.2026