The Conciliar Sect’s Scripture Readings: A Pelagian Oasis in a Desert of Apostasy
Infovaticana, a prominent outlet of the post-conciliar abomination of desolation, published its customary liturgical reading for February 15, 2026. The content, drawn from the modern Lectionary, presents the Book of Sirach’s call to choose between fire and water, St. Paul’s distinction between worldly and divine wisdom, and the Sermon on the Mount’s demands for interior purity. While the surface appears biblical, a thorough deconstruction from the perspective of integral Catholic faith reveals a calculated omission of supernatural grace, the social reign of Christ, and any reference to the catastrophic apostasy of the current era. The article functions as a spiritual tranquilizer, offering a naturalistic and Pelagian reading of Scripture that is perfectly suited to the neo-church’s program of humanistic deism.
1. The Omission of Christ’s Social Kingship: A Silent Rejection of Quas Primas
The most glaring omission is the complete absence of any reference to Our Lord Jesus Christ as King. The readings focus exclusively on individual moral choice (Sirach) and interior disposition (Matthew). This is not accidental; it is doctrinally deterministic. Pope Pius XI, in his 1925 encyclical Quas Primas—a document of the true Magisterium—established the feast of Christ the King precisely to combat the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism.” Pius XI taught that Christ’s reign “encompasses all men” and that “the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation” when “God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states.” The conciliar sect and its media, by presenting a Gospel stripped of its political and social implications, actively promote the very error condemned by Pius XI. They present a spiritualized Christ, a “king” of private conscience only, thereby legitimizing the secular state and the separation of Church and State, which Pope Pius IX condemned in the Syllabus of Errors (Proposition 55). The article’s silence is a denial of the Catholic doctrine of the Social Kingship of Christ.
2. Pelagianism in the Sirach Reading: The Illusion of Autonomous Choice
The first reading, Sirach 15:15-20, declares: “Si tú lo quieres, puedes guardar los mandamientos; permanecer fiel a ellos es cosa tuya… Delante del hombre están la muerte y la vida; le será dado lo que él escoja.” (If you will, you can keep the commandments; to remain faithful to them is your own affair… Before man are death and life; whichever he chooses will be given to him). This is presented without any counterbalancing context of grace. This is pure Pelagianism, the heresy that man, by his own unaided will and strength, can achieve moral perfection and salvation. The Council of Trent, in its Decree on Justification (Session VI, Chapter 1), anathematized this: “If anyone says that man can be justified before God by his own works… let him be anathema.” The true Catholic faith teaches that the ability to choose God and keep His commandments is itself a gift of prevenient grace. The article’s presentation, by isolating the text, implies a naturalistic, human-centered morality where man is the autonomous author of his salvation. This is a hallmark of the post-conciliar religion, which has replaced the theology of grace with a moralism of effort.
3. The “Wisdom” of the World vs. Divine Wisdom: A Modernist Distinction Without a Subject
St. Paul’s second reading (1 Cor 2:6-10) distinguishes between “the wisdom of this world” and “a divine wisdom, mysterious.” The article correctly quotes this, but in the context of the conciliar sect, this distinction is emptied of its historical and doctrinal content. For St. Paul, “the wisdom of this world” meant the philosophical systems of the Gentiles that opposed the Cross. For the modernist prelates of the Vatican II revolution, “the wisdom of this world” has been reinterpreted to mean pre-Vatican II Catholic theology and discipline. The “divine wisdom” becomes the evolving, human-consciousness-derived “theology” of Lamentabili sane exitu and Pascendi Dominici gregis (condemned by St. Pius X). The article’s use of this passage, therefore, is a crypto-modernist attack on the immutable doctrine of the Church. It implicitly positions the “old” Church as the “worldly wisdom” and the new, “updated” conciliar teachings as the “divine wisdom”—a complete inversion of Catholic truth.
4. The Sermon on the Mount: Interiorization Without Ecclesial or Social Context
The Gospel from Matthew 5 intensifies the moral law to the level of interior intention. This is sound doctrine. However, the presentation is radically de-contextualized. It omits the entire framework of the Kingdom of God, which for Christ was inseparable from His Mystical Body, the Church, and from the public order that would recognize His reign. In the full context of Matthew’s Gospel, this sermon is delivered to the Apostles, the foundation of the hierarchical Church, and it presupposes a society ordered according to the Law of God. The article presents it as a generic, individualistic self-improvement manual. This is the essence of Modernism: to reduce the supernatural, hierarchical, and social religion of Catholicism to a private, interior, and democratized “spirituality.” It is the syllabus of 1864’s error (Proposition 16) given a biblical veneer: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation.” Here, the “religion” is a bare, interiorized moralism detached from the concrete obligations of faith and membership in the one true Church.
5. The Symptomatic Silence on the Current Apostasy and the Usurper
The most damning evidence of the article’s origin in the conciliar sect is its complete silence on the material heresy and public apostasy of the current occupant of the Vatican, “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost). A faithful Catholic, especially a sedevacantist who understands the doctrine of St. Robert Bellarmine on the ipso facto loss of office by a manifest heretic, could not publish a liturgical reflection without a stern warning that the sacraments and liturgies administered by this usurper and his hierarchy are invalid or at least illicit and that participation in them is sacrilege. The silence is a formal cooperation in the ongoing public idolatry of the “abomination of desolation” standing in the holy place. It assumes the legitimacy of the “papacy” of Bergoglio-Francis and his successor Prevost, thereby denying the Catholic doctrine of the necessity of a true pope for the Church’s governance. This silence is not neutrality; it is apostasy in action.
6. Linguistic and Rhetorical Analysis: The Tone of Naturalistic Optimism
The language of the article is cautious, devotional, and focused on personal piety. There is no prophetic denunciation, no apocalyptic urgency, no polemic against error. This is the linguistic signature of the post-Conciliar Church, which Pope St. Pius X condemned in Pascendi as the “synthesis of all heresies.” The Modernist, according to St. Pius X, “seeks to win the confidence of the simple by an appearance of gravity and wisdom.” The article’s tone is one of soft, reassuring piety, perfectly calculated to anesthetize the reader to the existential crisis of the Church. It offers a “safe” biblical reading that requires no judgment, no confrontation with the apostate hierarchy, and no commitment to the uncompromising defense of Tradition. It is a symptom of the “dumbing down” of the faith, where the sacrificial, hierarchical, and missionary nature of Catholicism is replaced by a therapeutic, democratic, and ecumenical spirituality.
Conclusion: A Tool of the “Enemies Within”
The liturgical reading from Infovaticana is not a neutral spiritual resource. It is a doctrinal weapon in the hands of the conciliar sect. By stripping Scripture of its supernatural, hierarchical, and social dimensions, it promotes a naturalistic, humanistic, and Pelagian religion. It omits the Kingship of Christ over individuals, families, and nations—a doctrine solemnly defined by Pius XI. It ignores the apocalyptic reality of the See of Peter occupied by a series of manifest heretics, from John XXIII to Leo XIV. It presents a false irenicism that contradicts the militant, uncompromising spirit of the true Catholic Church as manifested in the Syllabus of Errors, Quas Primas, and the teachings of St. Pius X against Modernism. The faithful are called not to such a tepid, individualistic reading, but to the full, integral Catholic faith, to the public confession of Christ the King, and to the total rejection of the conciliar revolution and its pseudo-saints, pseudo-popes, and pseudo-liturgies. The only legitimate response to such an article is condemnation and repudiation.
Source:
Evangelio del día 15 de febrero de 2026 – Mateo 5, 20-22 (infovaticana.com)
Date: 15.02.2026