The cited EWTN News article reports on Iranian missile fragments falling near Jerusalem’s Church of the Holy Sepulchre, quoting Israeli officials condemning Iran for targeting “holy sites” and endangering “Jews, Muslims, and Christians alike.” It notes the complex is administered by multiple apostolic communities and receives millions of pilgrims. The article concludes by mentioning that “Tehran cardinal meets with Pope Leo XIV,” implicitly treating the post-conciliar “papacy” as legitimate and the event as a geopolitical tragedy requiring interfaith solidarity. This narrative, devoid of any supernatural perspective or condemnation of sin, epitomizes the theological and spiritual bankruptcy of the conciliar sect, which replaces the reign of Christ the King with naturalistic humanism and religious indifferentism.
Naturalistic Humanism Masquerading as Concern
The article’s entire frame is secular and naturalistic. It presents the incident as a violation of “holy sites” in generic, multi-religious terms, echoing the indifferentism condemned by Pope Pius IX’s *Syllabus of Errors*. Error #16 states: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation.” By listing “Jews, Muslims, and Christians alike” as equally endangered and implying the sites have equal “holiness” for different faiths, the article propagates the very error Pius IX anathematized. The true Catholic position, defined by the Council of Trent and reaffirmed by Pius IX, is that the Church alone is the “sacrament of salvation” and that the Holy Sepulchre is holy precisely because it is the site of Christ’s resurrection—a truth accessible only through Catholic faith. The article’s silence on the unique sanctity of the site for Catholics, and its failure to condemn the attack as an offense against the True God and His Church, reveals its foundation in the “secularism” or “laicism” that Pope Pius XI, in *Quas Primas*, called “the plague that poisons human society.”
The Omission of Sin and the Primacy of God’s Law
A defining characteristic of modernist reporting is the omission of sin, judgment, and the necessity of public reparation. The article mentions no call for prayer, penance, or reparation for the sacrilege committed against the sacred ground where Our Lord suffered, died, and rose. It does not reference the First Commandment’s prohibition of idolatry and the direct assault on the honor due to God alone when a site consecrated to His Son is endangered by missile fire from a regime that explicitly denies the divinity of Christ. This omission is not neutrality; it is apostasy. As *Quas Primas* teaches, Christ’s reign encompasses all human affairs, and “all power in heaven and on earth is given to Christ the Lord.” Therefore, an attack on a site intrinsically linked to His Passion and Resurrection is an attack on His royal dignity. The conciliar sect’s failure to proclaim this, and its reduction of the event to a geopolitical “danger to civilians,” demonstrates its complete abandonment of the doctrine that “the state must… publicly honor Christ and obey Him” (Pius XI). The article’s tone is that of a UN report, not a Catholic news service.
The “Interfaith” Paradigm as Modernist Error
The article’s emphasis on the shared endangerment of multiple religious communities is a direct manifestation of the “ecumenism project” described in the *False Fatima Apparitions* file, which warns that “imprecise formulation… opens the way to religious relativism.” Here, the relativism is explicit: the Holy Sepulchre, the Temple Mount, and the Jewish Quarter are presented as parallel “holy sites” for three different “Abrahamic” faiths, with no Catholic assertion of the truth and superiority of the one true religion. This is a concrete application of *Syllabus* Error #77: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship.” The conciliar sect, by its very structure and language, has institutionalized this error. The article’s source, EWTN, once a supposed bulwark of tradition, now functions as a mouthpiece for this indifferentist worldview, treating the “Latin Patriarchate” (a conciliar structure) as just one administrator among many in a shared custodianship of a site whose primary significance is Catholic.
The Usurper “Pope” and the Legitimization of Apostasy
The article’s casual reference to “Pope Leo XIV” meeting with a “Tehran cardinal” is a profound act of disinformation. According to the *Defense of Sedevacantism* file, based on St. Robert Bellarmine and Canon 188.4, a manifest heretic loses the papacy *ipso facto*. The line of usurpers from John XXIII through the current antipope (Robert Prevost) have all publicly embraced the errors of Modernism, religious liberty, and ecumenism—all condemned by St. Pius X in *Lamentabili sane exitu* and Pius IX in the *Syllabus*. Bellarmine states unequivocally: “a manifest heretic cannot be Pope… a non-Christian in no way can be Pope.” The meeting described is therefore a dialogue between a false “pontiff” and a prelate of a schismatic Eastern church, an act of apostasy that the article presents as normal. This normalizes the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15).
Contrast with Catholic Teaching Before the Apostasy
What would a truly Catholic report have emphasized? First, the unique sanctity of the Holy Sepulchre as the *terram sanctam* where the God-man redeemed the world. Second, a fierce condemnation of the Iranian regime’s aggression not merely as a geopolitical threat but as a sin crying out to heaven, an indirect attack on the Person of Christ. Third, a call for public prayer, penance, and the re-consecration of the site to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, as Pius XI urged in *Quas Primas*. Fourth, a clear assertion that the only legitimate authority in Jerusalem is the Catholic Church (in the person of a true pope and bishops in communion with him), and that all other “administrations” are either schismatic or tolerated without any equality of rights. The article contains none of this. Its silence on the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, on the state of grace, on the final judgment, and on the absolute sovereignty of Christ the King over all nations is the gravest accusation. It is a document of the “Church of the New Advent,” speaking the language of the world, not the language of the Faith.
Symptomatic of the Conciliar Revolution
This article is not an anomaly; it is the logical fruit of the conciliar revolution. The *False Fatima Apparitions* file identifies a “Masonic operation” to divert attention from “modernist apostasy within the Church.” Here, the diversion is complete: an attack near the most sacred Catholic site is framed as a multi-religious tragedy, with the “Church” (i.e., the conciliar sect) reduced to one voice among many in a chorus of lament. The article’s source, EWTN, has long abandoned the fight against Modernism. Its reporting on “Pope Leo XIV” and interfaith meetings demonstrates full assimilation to the “ecumenical reinterpretation” stage of the operation described in the Fatima file. The “two Lucia sisters” theory—suggesting a replacement of the true vision with a controlled figure—finds its parallel in the replacement of the Catholic Church with a “conciliar sect” that uses traditional terminology while promoting modernist errors. The article’s authors, whether knowingly or through culpable ignorance, are agents of this apostasy.
Conclusion: A Call to Reject the Narrative
The missile fragments near the Holy Sepulchre are a physical metaphor for the spiritual desecration perpetrated by the conciliar sect. The article, by its naturalistic framing and omission of Catholic truth, participates in that desecration. The only adequate response is the one Pius XI prescribed in *Quas Primas*: the public, solemn recognition of the reign of Christ the King over all individuals, families, and states—a reign the conciliar sect has deliberately dismantled. Until the true Catholic faith, as held before the apostasy of 1958, is restored, and the false “papacy” and its entire hierarchy are recognized as invalid and heretical (per Bellarmine and Canon 188.4), such events will be reported not as offenses against God, but as geopolitical incidents. The faithful must reject this narrative entirely, cling to the unchanging doctrine of the Church, and understand that the true Church suffers in exile while the “structures occupying the Vatican” promote the very errors that invite divine chastisement.
Source:
Iranian missile fragments fall near Church of the Holy Sepulchre (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 17.03.2026