[FILE: False Fatima Apparitions] and [FILE: Lamentabili sane exitu – St. Pius X and the Holy Office – 1907] provide the doctrinal foundation for evaluating the claims in this article. The article pres…
The National Catholic Register portal reports (May 25, 2026) that Dr. Jacob Goodwin, a neurologist, penned a commentary titled “The Little Mermaid’s Wager: When AI Speaks for Us,” which explicitly references and lauds a document from the usurper Robert Prevost, whom the conciliar sect addresses as “Pope Leo XIV.” The commentary discusses the implications of artificial intelligence on human writing and thought, framing it through the lens of this “papal” encyclical, *Magnifica Humanitas*. The article concludes by endorsing the “pope’s” call to “remain profoundly human” in the age of AI, presenting this stance as a balanced Catholic response to technological advancement. This entire narrative, however, is a masterclass in modernist diversion, focusing on a peripheral technological distraction while the very pillars of the Faith are being systematically dismantled by the very “authorities” it dares to quote.
The National Register portal (May 25, 2026) published a commentary by Joseph Pearce under the title “Mary, Mother of the Church: Hope Is the Sweetness of Our Life.” The article presents hope as the humblest of the theological virtues, yet the one that slays pride—the greatest of sins—comparing hope to David and pride to Goliath. Pearce draws upon the pagan myth of Pandora’s Box as an allegory for humanity’s fallen state, in which hope alone remains. He then recounts his personal testimony: as a young man imprisoned for involvement in a white supremacist organization, he discovered hope through a rosary sent to him, which eventually led him into the Catholic Church. The article concludes with an exhortation to turn to Mary as “our life, our sweetness, and our hope.” While the piece contains elements of genuine Catholic teaching on the theological virtues and the intercession of the Blessed Virgin, it is marred by a troubling naturalism, an uncritical embrace of pagan mythology as a vehicle of truth, and a personal narrative that, while moving, is presented within a framework that omits the supernatural economy of grace, the necessity of the sacraments, and the authority of the true Church as the sole ark of salvation.
National Catholic Register reports on the presentation of the first encyclical of the self-styled Leo XIV, “Magnifica Humanitas,” on artificial intelligence. The event, held in the Vatican’s Synod Hall, featured Christopher Olah, co-founder of the AI company Anthropic, who praised the document and called for dialogue between the “Church” and the tech industry. Leo XIV compared the impact of AI to the Industrial Revolution and called for AI to be “disarmed,” emphasizing the need for moral discernment and public control. He claimed the encyclical was born from listening to various voices, including scientists, engineers, and those concerned about autonomous weapons and biased algorithms. The event also included speeches by Cardinals Parolin, Fernández, and Czerny, as well as theologians Anna Rowlands and Leocadie Lushombo. This spectacle reveals the utter bankruptcy of the post-conciliar structure, which, having abandoned the supernatural mission of the Church, now seeks relevance by baptizing the latest technological idolatry and positioning itself as a mere “moral voice” among many in the globalist project.
EWTN News portal reports on May 25, 2026, that Robert Prevost, known as “Pope Leo XIV,” unveiled his first encyclical, *Magnifica Humanitas*, in a ceremony at the Vatican’s Synod Hall. The event was attended by members of the Roman Curia, academics, diplomats, and notably Christopher Olah, co-founder of Anthropic, a major artificial intelligence company. The self-styled pontiff praised the inclusion of a non-believing tech executive as a “sign of hope” and emphasized the need for “dialogue” and “mutual effort” to address the challenges of AI. He compared the current technological transformation to the Industrial Revolution, suggesting it may have “even greater consequences.” The document, signed on May 15, the anniversary of Leo XIII’s *Rerum Novarum*, calls for AI to be “disarmed” and warns of its impact on warfare, healthcare, and employment. The event featured speeches by Cardinals Parolin, Fernández, and Czerny, as well as theologians Anna Rowlands and Leocadie Lushombo. This entire spectacle is a grotesque parody of Catholic teaching, replacing the supernatural order with a fetishization of technology and a desperate plea for relevance in a world hurtling towards the abyss.
The Pillar Catholic portal reports on the release of “Magnifica humanitas,” the first encyclical of the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), dated May 25, 2026. The document, subtitled “On the safeguarding of the human person in the time of artificial intelligence,” purports to apply Catholic social teaching to the challenges posed by artificial intelligence in education, politics, work, and war. It critiques transhumanism and posthumanism while calling for the defense of human dignity and acknowledging the Church’s historical slowness in condemning slavery. However, a thorough examination reveals that this encyclical is not a defense of the integral Catholic faith, but rather a sophisticated articulation of modernist principles, reducing the Church’s mission to naturalistic humanism and further entrenching the conciliar sect’s departure from immutable Tradition.
VaticanNews portal reports on a “Mass of Reparation” held on May 23, 2026, in Catacaos, Peru, where Vatican delegates—including Cardinals Carlos Castillo Mattasoglio and Pedro Barreto—and Peruvian bishops knelt before indigenous campesinos to ask forgiveness for abuses committed by members of the dissolved “Sodalitium Christianae Vitae.” The article frames this gesture as a culmination of reconciliation efforts initiated by Pope Francis and continued by Pope Leo XIV, emphasizing themes of renewal, hope, and peace. Yet beneath the veneer of humility lies a profound theological inversion: the conciliar sect, having long abandoned its divine mandate to teach and govern, now performs public penance before the very world it was once ordained to consecrate to Christ the King.
National Catholic Register portal reports on May 25, 2026, that the first encyclical of the antipope Leo XIV, titled Magnifica Humanitas, draws upon a vast array of secular and non-Catholic sources — from Viktor Frankl and Hannah Arendt to J.R.R. Tolkien, Beethoven, Picasso, Steven Spielberg, Martin Luther King Jr., Marie Curie, Maria Montessori, Wangari Maathai, Benazir Bhutto, and even Plato — while conspicuously marginalizing the unchanging sources of Catholic doctrine: the Church Fathers, the ecumenical councils, and the perennial Magisterium. The article presents this syncretic compilation as evidence of a “broad range of cultural and philosophical figures for inspiration,” thereby revealing the conciliar sect’s complete capitulation to the cult of man and the abolition of the supernatural order.
EWTN News portal reports on the first encyclical of the usurper Robert Prevost, “Leo XIV,” titled *Magnifica Humanitas*, in which he draws inspiration not from the Church Fathers, Doctors, or saints of the true Catholic tradition, but from a pantheon of secular humanists, heretics, and figures of dubious faith — including J.R.R. Tolkien, Beethoven, Martin Luther King Jr., Hannah Arendt, Viktor Frankl, and even the condemned “Saint” Faustyna Kowalska. This encyclical is not a magisterial document of the Catholic Church but a manifesto of the conciliar sect’s apostate ideology, replacing divine revelation with naturalistic humanism and the cult of man.
Vatican News portal (May 25, 2026) reports on the promulgation of the encyclical “Magnifica Humanitas” by the usurper Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), presenting it as the conciliar sect’s response to artificial intelligence, calling for AI “disarmament” and placing technology at the service of “human dignity, solidarity and the common good.” The document draws explicit parallels with Rerum Novarum and invokes the usual modernist buzzwords: dialogue, cooperation, human fraternity, and a “civilisation of love.” Stripped of its pious veneer, this encyclical represents yet another capitulation of the occupying Vatican structures to the globalist agenda, reducing the Church’s supernatural mission to a humanitarian NGO advocating for technological ethics while remaining silent on the only true solution: the Social Kingship of Christ and the integral reign of God’s law over all creation.
