Just War Theory Reduced to Bureaucratic Calculus: Bishop Conley’s Moral Abdication
EWTN News portal reports that Bishop James D. Conley of Lincoln, Nebraska, published an op-ed titled “Just War 101: Catholic teaching for a dangerous moment,” offering what he calls a primer on just war theory amid the U.S.-Iran conflict. The bishop, son of a WWII veteran, presents the standard four conditions for *jus ad bellum* (last resort, proper authority, just cause, proportionality) and two for *jus in bello* (noncombatant immunity, proportionality of means). He references Pope Leo XIV’s calls for peace, acknowledges the Iranian regime’s evils, and even permits preemptive action against an enemy “on the brink of attacking.” Yet his treatment is sandwiched between the haunting story of Father George Zabelka, chaplain to the Enola Gay crew, who later repented of blessing the atomic bombings, and concludes with a plea for prayer and peace. The entire exercise is a masterclass in bureaucratic moralism—reducing the Church’s solemn teaching on war to a sterile checklist while remaining silent on the supernatural order, the reign of Christ the King, and the very possibility that modern warfare, waged by secular states devoid of Catholic principle, is intrinsically incapable of meeting the Church’s conditions. This is not Catholic doctrine administered; it is naturalistic ethics dressed in ecclesiastical vestments, a symptom of the conciliar Church’s capitulation to the world.





