The EWTN News portal (January 21, 2026) reports that the current Vatican occupant Leo XIV received leaders of the Neocatechumenal Way, praising their work of “rekindling the fire of the Gospel” and helping people “rediscover the beauty of knowing Jesus.” This endorsement of an ecclesial movement founded in 1964 exposes the neo-church’s systematic dismantling of sacramental theology and ecclesiastical obedience.
The EWTN News portal (January 20, 2026) reports that the post-conciliar religious structure in Córdoba, Spain, deployed three “priests” to provide “pastoral care” following a train accident that killed 42 people. The article describes psychological support and vague “spiritual comfort” offered at a civic center, with “priest” Leopoldo Rivero emphasizing “warmth and closeness” rather than administering sacraments. This response epitomizes the conciliar sect’s substitution of supernatural grace with naturalistic therapy.
VaticanNews portal (January 20, 2026) reports on a private meeting between antipope Leo XIV and leaders of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP), presenting it as a “cordial” exchange amid ongoing Vatican investigation into the group’s operations. The article frames this encounter as constructive dialogue, noting the FSSP’s claimed exemption from some restrictions imposed by Bergoglio’s Traditionis Custodes and the current “apostolic visitation” as routine oversight. This theatrical display of pretended unity starkly contrasts with the FSSP’s 38-year history of theological compromise and ceremonial traditionalism devoid of doctrinal integrity.
The EWTN News article commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Cristero War superficially recounts the Mexican government’s persecution of Catholics while omitting the conciliar sect’s ongoing betrayal of the martyrs’ sacrifice. Though accurately describing the 1917 Constitution’s anticlerical articles and Plutarco Calles’ tyrannical “Calles Law,” the analysis remains trapped within the modernist framework that equates “religious freedom” with state-sanctioned pluralism rather than Christus Rex’s sovereign claim over nations (Pius XI, Quas Primas).
The EWTN News portal (January 20, 2026) reports on ongoing protests in Iran since December 2025, noting casualties and arrests among Christian participants. The article emphasizes humanitarian efforts by Christians—including food distribution and medical aid—and mentions the killing of Ejmin Masihi and others of Armenian origin. It frames the conflict through secular human rights discourse, lamenting internet blackouts and “arbitrary arrests” while avoiding any substantive theological analysis of the Islamic regime’s hostility to Christ the King. This silence perpetuates the conciliar sect’s betrayal of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus (no salvation outside the Church) by reducing Christian witness to social activism.
The EWTN News portal (January 20, 2026) reports that “Pope” Leo XIV will celebrate the Holy Thursday Mass of the Lord’s Supper at the Basilica of St. John Lateran, ending a 12-year hiatus under his predecessor Francis. Monsignor Giovanni Falbo, a canon of the Lateran, claims this “restores a long-standing Roman tradition,” framing Francis’s prison liturgies as an “exception” motivated by “predilection for the poor.” The article applauds Leo XIV’s decision as evidence he intends to “behave as bishop of Rome,” citing his May 2025 possession of the Lateran chair. Historical context is provided on the foot-washing rite, noting Francis’s innovation of washing women’s and non-Christians’ feet, which Falbo dismisses as “privatization” of the liturgy.
EWTN News reports that Chiclayo, Peru, will host the 34th World Day of the Sick from February 9-11, 2026, at the Shrine of Our Lady of Peace. Cardinal Michael Czerny justified the choice by citing Chiclayo’s warm February climate as “a practical reason” to avoid “bad weather,” while claiming antipope Leo XIV was “very happy with the choice” due to his past missionary work in Peru. This event exemplifies the conciliar sect’s substitution of supernatural faith with climate calculations and personality cults.
The EWTN News portal reports on a message from “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) for the 34th World Day of the Sick, issued under the title “The Compassion of the Samaritan: Loving by Bearing Another’s Pain.” The text urges Catholics to “rediscover the beauty of charity” through “concrete gestures,” using the parable of the Good Samaritan as a model for “fraternal” action in a society marked by “haste and indifference.” The principal observance will occur in Chiclayo, Peru, where the antipope previously served as “bishop.” The message insists that “love is not passive” but must manifest through “authentic worship” expressed in social service, drawing heavily on Bergoglio’s Fratelli Tutti to frame compassion as a collective responsibility. The apostate John Paul II—originator of this annual observance—is cited without critique, while the “Virgin Mary under her title Health of the Sick” is invoked superficially. This modernist distortion reduces charity to a horizontal act of human solidarity, evacuating it of supernatural purpose.
EWTN News reports on the January 18, 2026 celebration of the Santo Niño (Infant Jesus) feast in Cebu, Philippines, drawing 5.2 million attendees. The article emphasizes the event’s spiritual nature over tourism, tracing its origins to Ferdinand Magellan’s 1521 arrival when he gave a Santo Niño statue to Queen Juana upon her baptism. “Pope” Leo XIV sent a message stressing baptismal unity and service to marginalized groups, while Archbishop Alberto Uy preached about being “united with Christ” through “redeeming love.” The festivities included a fluvial procession reenacting the statue’s historical arrival and nine days of novenas at Basilica Minore del Santo Niño.
EWTN News reports on the January 20, 2026 meeting between the antipope Leo XIV and Czech President Petr Pavel, framing it as a discussion about “democracy,” transatlantic tensions, and the release of a Czech citizen from Venezuela. The article praises the “extraordinary diplomatic reach” of the conciliar sect while omitting any reference to the Social Reign of Christ the King (Regnum Christi sociale). This omission exposes the apostate nature of the encounter.
