Catholic News Agency reports that a group of conciliar sect “clergy” filed a lawsuit on November 19, 2025, demanding access to distribute “Communion” at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Broadview, Illinois. The article describes how “Auxiliary Bishop José María García-Maldonado” and others were denied entry on November 1 despite prior requests, prompting legal action based on First Amendment claims and religious freedom statutes. The report quotes “Pope” Leo XIV as stating: “their own spiritual needs should be attended to,” while U.S. “bishops” issued a November 12 message about migrant “human dignity.” The piece frames this as a conflict between government policies and religious accommodation, omitting any examination of the conciliar sect’s invalid sacraments or theologically void concept of “pastoral care.”
Sacramental Simulation Masquerading as Charity
The lawsuit’s central demand – government-guaranteed access to distribute “Communion” – constitutes blasphemous theater. As Pius XII’s Mediator Dei (1947) declares: “The august sacrifice of the altar is not a ceremonial chant or a hollow pageant, but a reality.” These conciliar operatives peddle invalid matter (likely unconsecrated bread) through illicit ministers (dubiously ordained post-1968) to detainees who almost certainly lack proper disposition. Canon 731 §2 of the 1917 Code explicitly forbids administering sacraments to those publicly unworthy or obstinate sinners – conditions applicable to most ICE detainees given their likely irregular marital status, non-Catholic beliefs, or participation in protestant sects.
“Federal court continues review of ICE facility…Judge Robert W. Gettleman…issued a temporary restraining order directing DHS and ICE to improve living conditions at Broadview.”
This legalistic focus on physical comforts (hygiene products, dietary allowances) while demanding sacrilegious “Communion” distribution epitomizes the conciliar inversion of priorities. Quas Primas (1925) establishes that Christ’s Kingship demands the submission of all civil authorities to His reign, yet the “bishops” plead with courts like supplicants rather than commanding as princes of the Church. Their silence about detainees’ need for valid confession before receiving Holy Communion (Council of Trent, Session XIII, Chapter VII) reveals modernist obsession with activism over salvation.
Conciliar Ecclesiology’s Heretical Foundation
The article’s claim that “faith leaders have provided religious services at Broadview for years” exposes the conciliar sect’s ecumenical apostasy. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors condemns as heresy the notion that “the Church has not the power of defining dogmatically that the religion of the Catholic Church is the only true religion” (Error 21). By treating protestant chaplains as equal “faith leaders” and their rituals as valid “religious services,” the conciliar operatives practice the religious indifferentism anathematized by Mortalium Animos (1928).
“Pope Leo XIV said earlier this month…’their own spiritual needs should be attended to.'”
This statement from the antipope underscores the conciliar sect’s anthropocentric shift. Contrast this vague “spiritual needs” language with Pius X’s Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907), which condemns modernists for reducing religion to “religious experience” detached from dogma. The detainees’ true need – conversion to Catholicism and reception of valid sacraments – goes unmentioned, replaced by therapeutic deism.
The Masonic Roots of Immigration Idolatry
The lawsuit’s legal framework – invoking “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” and “Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act” – demonstrates the conciliar sect’s embrace of Americanist heresy. Pope Leo XIII’s Testem Benevolentiae (1899) condemned the error that “Church and state should be separated,” yet here we see “bishops” begging secular courts for “rights” that properly belong to the Church by divine institution. Their alliance with ACLU lawyers (notorious enemies of Catholicism) to sue DHS reveals the conciliar church’s true nature as a NGO pursuing earthly agendas.
“U.S. bishops likewise issued a special message Nov. 12 calling for the human dignity of migrants to be respected.”
This focus on “human dignity” divorced from sanctifying grace constitutes the “cult of man” denounced in St. Pius X’s Pascendi. The Catechism of the Council of Trent teaches that human dignity flows from being “made to the image and likeness of God” (Genesis 1:27) – a likeness restored through baptism and preserved through obedience to Church teaching. By promoting dignity without conversion, the conciliar sect facilitates souls’ damnation while posturing as humanitarians.
Omissions That Condemn
The article’s silence on three critical issues exposes its diabolical disorientation:
1. No mention of repentance: Not a word about detainees needing confession of sins or renunciation of false religions before approaching Communion (Council of Trent, Session XIII, Canon 11).
2. No distinction between valid and invalid clergy: The “auxiliary bishop” García-Maldonado’s orders are presumed valid despite post-conciliar rites’ doubtful form and intention (Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 1983).
3. No warning about sacrilege: Receiving “Communion” in post-conciliar structures constitutes idolatry, given their invalid Masses and heretical teachings (St. Pius V, Quo Primum).
This lawsuit represents not Catholic charity, but the conciliar sect’s final assimilation into the New World Order – using pseudo-sacraments to pacify marginalized groups while collaborating with government forces hostile to Christ the King. As St. Pius X warned in Notre Charge Apostolique (1910): “All this is but the miserable aftermath of the apostasy of modern society from God.”
Source:
Faith leaders file suit to distribute Communion at ICE facility (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 19.11.2025