The EWTN News portal (ACI Prensa/EWTN News English) reports on August 5, 2026, that a man identified as “Father Álisson Muryel,” described as the “ecclesiastical adviser for the prison ministry in the Archdiocese of Campo Grande,” administered the sacraments of Baptism, Confirmation, and the Eucharist to two inmates—one a former member of the *Comando Vermelho* criminal organization—at the Gameleira 2 maximum-security penitentiary in Campo Grande, Brazil. The event is presented as a triumph of “prison ministry” coordinated by Said Brandão Sayd, who emphasizes “education, celebration, and life in the faith,” the creation of a “Catholic community within the prison,” and the proclamation of “Jesus” as the sole source of “conversion.” The article details a program of “catechesis” spanning one to two years, monthly “Masses” in cellblocks, and “confession” preceding them. This report does not document a supernatural intervention of grace; it exposes the sacrilegious simulation of the sacraments by the conciliar sect’s invalid clergy, deceiving vulnerable souls into believing they have received the life of grace while leaving them in the darkness of original sin and spiritual death.
The Ontological Nullity of the “Sacraments” Administered by the Conciliar Sect
The entire edifice of this reported event rests upon a fundamental lie: the claim that the “Archdiocese of Campo Grande” and its “clergy” possess the power to confect the sacraments. From the perspective of integral Catholic theology—the only theology guaranteed by the Holy Ghost until the usurpation of the Holy See in 1958—this claim is ontologically impossible.
1. Invalid Holy Orders: The Root of the Nullity
The man “Father Álisson Muryel” operates under the “Archdiocese of Campo Grande,” a structure of the conciliar sect (the “Church of the New Advent,” the abomination of desolation occupying Vatican structures). The bishops of this sect, including the “Archbishop of Campo Grande,” receive their “episcopal consecration” via the Paul VI rite of 1968, which defects in form and intention from the sacramental tradition defined by the Council of Trent (Sess. VII, Can. 1 on Sacraments; Sess. XXIII, Can. 4 on Orders) and the Pontifical of Pope Pius XII (*Sacramentum Ordinis*, 1947). Leo XIII, in Apostolicae Curae (1896), declared Anglican orders “absolutely null and utterly void” due to defect of form and intention; the new rite of episcopal consecration suffers from the identical, indeed graver, defects—suppressing the essential form (“Receive the Holy Ghost…”) and replacing it with a vague invocation, while the intention is to ordain for a “presbyterate” of the novus ordo religion, not the Catholic priesthood of the Propitiatory Sacrifice. No valid bishop = no valid priest = no valid sacraments (except Baptism and Matrimony, which require only matter, form, and minimal intention).
2. The “Baptism”: Dubious Validity Amidst Heretical Intention
While the matter (water) and form (“I baptize you in the name of the Father…”) *may* have been used, the intention of the minister is decisive. “Father Muryel” intends to baptize into the conciliar sect, the “Church of Vatican II,” which professes false doctrines (religious liberty, false ecumenism, collegiality) condemned by the Syllabus of Pius IX and Pascendi Dominici Gregis of St. Pius X. As the Catechism of the Council of Trent teaches, the minister must intend to do what the Church does. If the “Church” he serves is a heretical sect, his intention is vitiated. Furthermore, the article mentions “catechesis” on “the creed, the commandments, prayer, and the sacraments”—a novus ordo catechesis stripped of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus, the Social Kingship of Christ, and the necessity of the True Church for salvation. These souls may well remain unbaptized, bound by original sin.
3. The “Confirmation”: A Null Ritual
The “sacrament of Confirmation” administered by a “priest” (even if he were validly ordained, which he is not) without valid episcopal delegation (from a valid bishop) is invalid. In the Latin Rite, the ordinary minister is the Bishop. The “Archbishop of Campo Grande” lacks valid orders and jurisdiction. The chrism used is “consecrated” by an invalid bishop in the novus ordo “Chrism Mass,” a fabrication of Paul VI. No valid chrism, no valid minister, no sacrament. The inmates received a religious ceremony, not the Signaculum Doni Spiritus Sancti.
4. The “Eucharist” and the “Mass”: Idolatry and Sacrilege
The article states: “a monthly Mass is held at the prison… Mass is preceded by a time of confession.” This is the gravest deception. The “Mass” celebrated by “Father Muryel” uses the Novus Ordo Missae (1969), a rite fabricated by the Freemason Bugnini and his committee, which radically alters the Canon, suppresses the explicit propitiatory language (“offerimus tibi… hostiam puram, hostiam sanctam, hostiam immaculatam”), replaces the sacrificial theology with a “memorial” and “sacred banquet” narrative, and introduces a defective form of consecration (“for all” vs “for many” in the original Latin *pro multis*, though the vernacular translations compound the error). The Catechism of Trent defines the Mass as the unbloody renewal of the Sacrifice of Calvary. The novus ordo service is a Protestantized commemorative meal. There is no Transubstantiation where the form and intention are defective. The “Host” remains bread. The “Confession” heard by an invalid priest grants no absolution (Ego te absolvo requires jurisdiction and orders). The inmates adore bread; they commit objective idolatry, encouraged by the “clergy” of the paramasonic structure.
The Linguistic Masking of Apostasy: “Ministry” Replaces “Mission”, “Community” Replaces “Church Militant”
The rhetoric of the coordinator, Said Brandão Sayd, reveals the naturalistic, anthropocentric spirit of the conciliar revolution. He speaks the language of the Civitas Terrena, not the Civitas Dei.
1. “Education, celebration, and life in the faith”
This triad replaces the munus docendi, sanctificandi, regendi. “Education” implies a human process of formation, not the magisterium infallibly proposing divine truth. “Celebration” is the liturgical keyword of the novus ordo (the “celebration of the Eucharist”), deliberately avoiding “Sacrifice” (*Sacrificium*). “Life in the faith” is a vague, subjective sentiment, not the virtus fidei infusa adhering to omnia quae a Deo revelata sunt.
2. “Catholic community within the prison”
The term “community” (communitas) is the ecclesiological heresy of Vatican II (*Lumen Gentium*), replacing the Societas Perfecta, the Corpus Mysticum Christi visible and hierarchical. A “community” is a sociological grouping; the Church is a monarchical society (Pius XI, *Quas Primas*; Pius XII, *Mystici Corporis*). The goal is not to incorporate souls into the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church (which subsists only in those retaining the integral faith and valid sacraments), but to build a human support group inside a penitentiary.
3. “State of grace” / “Rebuild his life” / “Human rights”
Brandão says: “ensure that people… can effectively leave that place or live there in a state of grace.” But the state of grace is impossible without valid sacramental confession (or perfect contrition with *votum confessionis*), which requires a valid priest. The “priest” here is invalid. The focus on “rebuilding his life” and “human rights” (explicitly mentioned: “not enough simply to offer a hug or be deeply concerned about human rights”) reveals the horizontal reduction of the Gospel to social work. This is the heresy of humanitarianism condemned by St. Pius X in *Notre Charge Apostolique* (1910) against the *Sillon*: “Catholic doctrine teaches us that the primary duty of charity does not lie in the toleration of false ideas… but in the zeal for the salvation of souls.”
4. “Proclaim the message” / “Conversion”
“Without that, there is no conversion,” says Brandão. But conversion to what? To the conciliar sect. To a “Jesus” divorced from His Kingship over nations (denied by the sect’s *Dignitatis Humanae*), divorced from His exclusive Church (denied by *Unitatis Redintegratio*), present in a “Mass” that is not a Sacrifice. This is conversion to a phantom, a simulacrum Christi. As Pius XI taught in Quas Primas (provided in context): “Peace is only possible in the kingdom of Christ… When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” This “prison ministry” operates within a secular state framework, explicitly avoiding the Social Kingship of Christ over the prison system, the laws, and the inmates’ souls.
The Theological Vacuum: Silence on Sin, Judgment, and the Necessity of the True Church
The article’s omissions are its loudest condemnation. Nowhere does the report—nor the quoted “catechesis” dimensions—mention:
1. Original Sin and the Necessity of Baptism for Salvation
The Catechism of Trent (following Florence, Trent, Vatican I) teaches: “If anyone shall say that baptism is optional, that is, not necessary for salvation: let him be anathema” (Trent, Sess. VII, Can. 5 on Baptism). The article treats Baptism as a “sacrament of initiation” in a program, a step in “catechesis,” not the absolute prerequisite for entering the Kingdom of Heaven (*John 3:5*). The inmate “due to leave soon” wants to “rebuild his life”; the supernatural urgency of rescuing a soul from the limbus puerorum or hell is absent.
2. Mortal Sin, Hell, and the Four Last Things
The “catechesis” covers “the commandments” but apparently not the eternal consequences of violating them. St. Alphonsus Liguori: “He who does not meditate on the Four Last Things (Death, Judgment, Heaven, Hell) will hardly avoid sin.” The “former organized crime member” likely has a soul burdened with grave matter. The “confession” before the invalid “Mass” offers him zero sacramental guarantee of forgiveness. He leaves the “celebration” with his mortal sins retained (*John 20:23* requires valid orders/jurisdiction).
3. The Propitiatory Sacrifice and the Real Presence
The “Mass” is described as a “monthly Mass… in one of the four cellblocks… each block has three Masses a year.” This trivialization—three “Masses” a year per block—exposes the sect’s functional view of the liturgy as a pastoral service, not the Actio Christi, the Sacrificium Laudis offered daily for the vivis et defunctis. The Council of Trent (Sess. XXII, Can. 1) anathematizes those who deny the Mass is a true and proper sacrifice. The novus ordo service denies it in its theology and practice.
4. Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and the Social Kingship of Christ
The “Archdiocese of Campo Grande” operates as a chaplaincy service tolerated by the Masonic Brazilian State (separation of Church and State, condemned in *Syllabus* Error 55). It does not proclaim Christ the King over the prison, the laws, the guards, the state. It seeks “freedom… to proclaim the message” (Brandão), a libertas ecclesiae reduced to libertas cultus (freedom of worship), condemned by Pius IX (*Quanta Cura*, *Syllabus* Error 77, 78, 79). Quas Primas declares: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians… The state is happy not by one means, and man by another… Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ.” This “ministry” is the antithesis of Quas Primas: it collaborates with the secular power in managing inmates, offering religious sedation instead of the Kingship of Christ.
The Symptomatic Fruit of Vatican II: Humanitarian NGO Masquerading as the Bride of Christ
This event is not an anomaly; it is the logical and necessary fruit of the conciliar revolution.
1. The “Prison Ministry” as a Parachurch NGO
The structure described—”team of catechists, supported by a parish, at every prison,” “organized by cellblock,” “monthly catechesis sessions,” “four dimensions of faith”—is a bureaucratic pastoral program, indistinguishable from secular rehabilitation programs (education, therapy, community building) save for the religious vocabulary. It is the Caritas/Pastoral Care model: the Church reduced to a social service provider. The “coordinator” Brandão is a lay functionary; the “priest” is a sacramental functionary. The hierarchy of order and jurisdiction is flattened into a “team.”
2. EWTN/ACI Prensa: The Propaganda Arm of the Abomination
The source, EWTN News (ACI Prensa), is a media conglomerate of the conciliar sect, founded by the “Mother Angelica” of the novus ordo (herself a promoter of the Charismatic Renewal, Medjugorje, and the “Divine Mercy” devotion of the pseudo-mystic Faustina Kowalska—writings once on the Index, condemned by the Holy Office). This portal exists to manufacture consent for the “neo-church”, presenting simulations of sacramental life as victories of the “Holy Spirit.” The headline “Former organized crime member receives baptism, Eucharist, and confirmation” is a lie crafted for fundraising and legitimization. The reality: a soul was ritually washed with invalid water, anointed with invalid oil, fed invalid bread, by an invalid priest, in a false church.
3. The Deception of the “Catechumens”
The inmates follow a program “lasting one or two years… to ensure the inmate is aware of what he is receiving, and embraces it.” They are taught to embrace a phantom. They are told they receive the Holy Ghost in Confirmation; they receive air. They are told they receive the Body of Christ; they receive bread. They are told their sins are forgiven; they remain bound. This is the spiritual murder of souls (*Ezechiel 3:18-19*), perpetrated by the “blind guides” (*Matt 15:14*) of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican.
4. The “Stable Relationship” and “Sacrament of Marriage”
The article notes the other inmate “is in a stable relationship but wants to receive the sacrament of marriage.” In the novus ordo sect, “marriage” is often administered to those living in concubinage, with annulments granted by the thousands (the “divorce Catholic style”). The “preparation” in the second half of the year will likely culminate in a simulated nuptial blessing by the invalid “priest,” leaving the parties in a state of objective concubinage, unbound by the indissoluble bond of the true Sacrament (Canon 1012, 1917 Code; *Casti Connubii*, Pius XI).
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in the Prison Cell
What occurred in Gameleira 2 on July 26 was not the Missio Ecclesiae. It was a Masonic psychodrama (recall the False Fatima Apparitions context: “Stage 3: Takeover of the narrative by modernists… ecumenical reinterpretation”), a ritual of the Counter-Church designed to pacify the conscience of sinners with false sacraments, integrating them into the New World Order‘s religious synthesis.
The true Catholic Church—Ecclesia Militans, subsisting in the faithful bishops and priests retaining the Tridentine Mass, the traditional rites, the unchanging doctrine, and the Sede Vacante consciousness—weeps for these souls. She alone possesses the Potestas Ordinis and Potestas Iurisdictionis to remit sins, to confer the Holy Ghost, to offer the Unbloody Sacrifice. The “Archdiocese of Campo Grande” possesses nothing but the name (*Apoc 3:1*).
Let the faithful flee these thieves and robbers (*John 10:8*) who enter not by the door (Christ, the True Priesthood) but climb up another way (the novus ordo rites, the Vatican II “ordination”). Let them seek the valid Mass and valid Sacraments where the Traditio is kept entire. “Outside the Church there is no salvation” (*Fourth Lateran Council, 1215; Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam*). The conciliar sect is outside the Church. Its “sacraments” are empty signs. Its “conversions” are illusions. Its “prison ministry” is a ministry of eternal death.
“Woe to the shepherds that destroy and tear the sheep of my pasture, saith the Lord.” (Jer 23:1).
Source:
Former organized crime member receives baptism, Eucharist, and confirmation in Brazilian prison (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 05.08.2026