The National Catholic Register portal reports that on August 5, 2026, the Secretary of State of the conciliar sect, “Cardinal” Pietro Parolin, met with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo at the National Palace, assuring her that the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) is “very eager to come” to Mexico, though any visit must await the conclusion of the 2027 midterm elections. The Mexican episcopate declared this diplomatic foray “rekindles hope” for the “presence and direct blessing of His Holiness.” Sheinbaum praised the antipope’s encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas* for its “humanitarian vision” of “peace, fraternity, and closeness to the most vulnerable,” while the discussion also covered a government-gun buyback program (“Yes to Disarmament, Yes to Peace”) and the restoration of historic churches. The itinerary prioritizes Peru, Argentina, and Uruguay in November 2026—nations “Pope Francis did not visit.” This episode manifests the total subversion of the Church’s divine mission into a geopolitical NGO servile to Masonic statecraft.
The Diplomatic Farce: A “Secretary of State” Without a State Serves a “Pope” Without a See
The very spectacle of “Cardinal” Parolin—a creature of the antipapal line inaugurated by the Modernist usurper John XXIII—negotiating travel logistics with a socialist head of state lays bare the abomination of desolation (abominatio desolationis) foretold by Daniel and confirmed by Our Lord (Matt. 24:15). The Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX condemns as error the proposition that “The ecclesiastical power ought not to exercise its authority without the permission and assent of the civil government” (Error 20) and that “The Church has not the power of using force, nor has she any temporal power, direct or indirect” (Error 24). Here, the conciliar sect’s chief diplomat begs audience with the civil power, scheduling the antipope’s movements around electoral calendars—a grotesque inversion of the divine order wherein potestas ecclesiastica derives from Christ the King, not from the suffrage of the populace.
The “Vatican Secretary of State” operates not as the minister of the Vicar of Christ but as the foreign minister of a paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican. His assurance that Leo XIV is “very eager to come” reveals the animus of the conciliar “papacy”: not the salus animarum (salvation of souls), but the curia humanitatis (care of humanity) in its Masonic acceptation. The true Pope, as Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas, “reigns in the minds of men… in the wills of men… in the hearts of men” by the hypostatic union and the redemption; the antipope “reigns” only by the sufferance of secular regimes and the applause of the world.
Magnifica Humanitas: The Encyclopedia of the Antichrist’s Religion of Man
Sheinbaum’s endorsement of the antipope’s first encyclical—Magnifica Humanitas—for its “calls for peace, fraternity, and closeness to the most vulnerable” exposes the theological vacuum at the heart of the conciliar sect. The title itself—Magnifica Humanitas (“Magnificent Humanity”)—proclaims the cult of man condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis as the synthesis of all heresies. The “peace, fraternity, and closeness” lauded by the Mexican president are the Masonic triad of Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité baptized in holy water, the pax humana of the City of Man substituting for the pax Christi in regno Christi (peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ).
Pius XI, in Quas Primas, declares with unshakeable authority: “The hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior.” The antipope’s encyclical, celebrated by a socialist ruler, offers precisely the peace of the world which Christ rejected (John 14:27), a humanitarianism without the God-Man, a fraternity without the Fatherhood of God. The silence of the conciliar “bishops” on the Social Kingship of Christ—the very doctrine Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King to proclaim—is not an omission but an apostasy. They have “removed Jesus Christ and His most holy law from… public life” (Quas Primas), replacing the Kingship of Christ with the presidency of humanity.
Subservience to the Electoral Calendar: The Conciliar Sect as a Department of State
The revelation that the antipope “obviously could not come to Mexico during the electoral period” and must wait until after the June 2027 midterms is a public confession of servility to the civil power that would have horrified the martyrs of the Cristero War. The Syllabus condemns the error that “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41) and that “In the case of conflicting laws enacted by the two powers, the civil law prevails” (Error 42). Here, the conciliar “pope” subordinates his putative pastoral visit to the electoral timetable of a Masonic republic, implicitly acknowledging the supremacy of the secular order.
This is the fruit of the false doctrine of “religious liberty” proclaimed by Dignitatis Humanae (1965), which Pius IX’s Syllabus anathematizes in Errors 15, 55, and 77: the Church reduced to a private association requesting permits from the state to exercise its divine mandate. The true Church, as Leo XIII taught in Immortale Dei, is perfecta societas—a perfect society with rights a Deo, not ab homine. The conciliar sect, by contrast, functions as an NGO with tax-exempt status, its “pope” a globetrotting humanitarian celebrity whose itinerary is cleared by presidential palaces, not by the Prince of the Apostles.
“Yes to Disarmament, Yes to Peace”: The Gospel According to the UN
The joint discussion of the program “Yes to Disarmament, Yes to Peace“—exchanging firearms for economic incentives—epitomizes the reduction of the supernatural to the sociological. The Church’s mission is disarmament of the soul from sin through the Sacrament of Penance and the preaching of the Cross, not the collection of metal objects via state-funded buybacks. This is the caritas of the Civitas Terrena, the philanthropy of the Antichrist foretold by the Fathers: a counterfeit charity that feeds the body while starving the soul.
The Mexican episcopate’s complicity in this program—trading the gladius Spiritus (sword of the Spirit, Eph. 6:17) for the pecunia of the state—fulfills the prophecy of Lamentabili Sane Exitu: Modernism “aims at such a development of dogmas as appears to be their corruption” (Prop. 1). The “restoration of historic churches” discussed alongside the gun buyback further manifests the museification of the sacred: churches as cultural heritage sites rather than domus Dei et porta caeli (house of God and gate of heaven). The conciliar sect preserves the stones while denying the Sacrifice; it restores the architecture while demolishing the altar.
The Itinerary of the Usurper: Tourism Masquerading as Apostolate
The prioritization of Peru, Argentina, and Uruguay—”countries Pope Francis did not visit”—reveals the purely diplomatic, even touristic, nature of the conciliar “apostolic journeys.” The true Vicar of Christ travels ad salutem animarum (for the salvation of souls), to confirm the brethren in the faith (Luke 22:32), to condemn error, to canonize saints, to govern the Church. The antipope travels to fill gaps in his predecessor’s travel log, a bureaucrat of goodwill checking boxes on a globalist agenda.
The mention of a “special relationship” with Peru because the antipope “lived there for many years” reduces the papacy to personal sentiment and geographical accident. Ubi Petrus, ibi Ecclesia (Where Peter is, there is the Church)—but Peter is not in the Vatican. The See is vacant (sede vacante) since the death of Pius XII (1958), and the line of claimants since John XXIII are manifest heretics who, by the teaching of St. Robert Bellarmine (De Romano Pontifice), “cease to be Pope and head… by that very fact” (ipso facto). Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code confirms: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” The conciliar “popes” have publicly defected by professing the heresies of Vatican II: religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, the new Mass.
The Mexican Episcopate: Blind Guides of a Blind People
The statement of the Mexican “bishops” that Parolin’s visit “rekindles hope” for the “blessing of His Holiness Leo XIV” is a scandalous betrayal of the Mexican martyrs—the Cristiada heroes who died crying ¡Viva Cristo Rey! These “bishops,” validly ordained perhaps but canonically missionless (lacking jurisdiction from a true Pope), function as chaplains to the revolution. They offer the Mexican people not the Kingship of Christ but the blessing of an antipope—a simulacrum of grace that hardens hearts in schism.
St. Pius X in Pascendi warns that Modernists “aim at such a development of dogmas as appears to be their corruption”. The Mexican hierarchy has corrupted the very notion of episcopal duty: not docere, sanctificare, regere (to teach, sanctify, govern), but to facilitate state policy, to curate heritage sites, to celebrate humanitarianism. Their silence on the abortion laws, gender ideology, Masonic control of the state—all rampant in Mexico—is the silence of the hireling (John 10:12-13) who flees when the wolf comes, because he cares not for the sheep.
The Theological Verdict: Non Est Papa
Every element of this report—the diplomatic servility, the humanitarian encyclical, the electoral scheduling, the gun buyback, the heritage tourism—converges to demonstrate that the conciliar sect is not the Catholic Church but its counterfeit, the ecclesia maligna (malignant church) of the Apocalypse. The “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) is a layman masquerading as pontiff (if the Thuc-line orders are invalid) or a priest/bishop who has publicly defected from the faith by accepting the conciliar errors. In either case, he is not the Pope.
The faithful Catholic, adhering to the Quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus (Vincentian Canon), must reject this entire theater. The “blessing” of the antipope is no blessing; his “visit” is a visitation of judgment upon those who receive him as Peter. The true Church of Christ subsists in the remnant who keep the integral faith, the traditional Mass, the Social Kingship of Christ—outside the structures occupying the Vatican. Non possumus (We cannot) collaborate with the paramasonic structure; Non possumus recognize its “pope”; Non possumus call its “bishops” successors of the Apostles.
¡Viva Cristo Rey! ¡Viva la Santa Iglesia Católica! ¡Muera la secta conciliar!
Source:
The Pope Is ‘Very Eager to Come to Mexico,’ Vatican Secretary of State Tells Mexican President (ncregister.com)
Date: 07.08.2026