Vatican News portal reports on the dire situation in Taybeh, the last all-Christian village in the West Bank, citing an interview with the “Latin parish priest” Fr. Bashar Fawadleh. The piece details settler violence, home invasions, arson, and military closures, framing the crisis as a humanitarian emergency requiring “international presence,” “political will,” and the intervention of “Pope Leo XIV.” The “priest” appeals for prayers, diplomatic pressure, and support for the “Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem,” emphasizing “Christian unity” among “Orthodox, Latin, Melkite, and Greek Catholic communities” and the preservation of a “living testament of faith” ahead of the 2033 Jubilee. This reportage exposes the conciliar sect’s total substitution of the Kingdom of God for a humanitarian NGO agenda, legitimizing a usurper on the Chair of Peter and validating the post-conciliar apostasy.
The Naturalistic Reduction of the Church’s Mission to Geopolitical Survival
The cited article is a masterclass in the hermeneutic of discontinuity masquerading as pastoral concern. Nowhere does the “priest” Fawadleh, nor the Vatican News mouthpiece, invoke the Social Kingship of Christ the King as the sole remedy for the evils afflicting Taybeh. Instead, the vocabulary is entirely borrowed from the lexicon of the United Nations and Masonic lodges: “international community,” “legal options,” “political solution,” “human dignity,” “justice and dignity,” “diplomatic missions.” This is the laicism condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The “priest” explicitly states: “While there is no political solution in sight, there is something very special keeping us going: our hope in Jesus Christ.” This admission—that the political order is the primary horizon of expectation, with Christ relegated to a psychological crutch—is the essence of Modernism condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 59): “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places.” The mission of the Church is not the preservation of a demographic “Christian presence” as a museum piece for a 2033 Jubilee, but the salus animarum through the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary and the subjection of all nations to the Kingship of Christ.
Legitimization of the Usurper and the Invalid Hierarchy
The most egregious theological scandal is the direct appeal to “Pope Leo XIV” (Robert Prevost). The article records the “priest” saying: “Through your platform, I would like to appeal directly to Pope Leo XIV to intervene for this last Christian village.” This act constitutes formal recognition of a manifest heretic as the Vicar of Christ. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches in De Romano Pontifice: “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The line of usurpers beginning with John XXIII has consistently propagated the errors of religious liberty, false ecumenism, and collegiality—heresies condemned by the Syllabus of Pius IX (Props. 15, 16, 18, 55, 77, 79, 80) and Quas Primas. Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio declares the promotion of a heretic “null, void, and of no effect.” To appeal to “Leo XIV” is to appeal to a private individual occupying the Vatican palaces, a paramasonic structure usurping the visible Church. Furthermore, the reference to “Cardinal Pizzaballa” and the “Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem” validates a hierarchy ordained in the invalid post-1968 rites, devoid of sacramental character and jurisdiction. As Wernz and Vidal confirm regarding Bellarmine: “By notorious and publicly manifested heresy, the Roman Pontiff… is deprived ipso facto of his personal jurisdiction even before any declaratory sentence by the Church.”
False Ecumenism as Betrayal of the First Commandment
The article boasts: “Faced with this crisis, the Christian community stands completely united. The Church is walking alongside these families… Orthodox, Latin, Melkite, and Greek Catholic communities organizing to support the victims.” This is the ecumenism of blood so dear to the conciliar sect—a diabolical counterfeit of Catholic unity. The Syllabus condemns the proposition: “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion… in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church” (Prop. 18). The “Orthodox” are schismatics, rejecting the Filioque and the Primacy of Peter; the “Melkites” and “Greek Catholics” are often unions maintained on the basis of doctrinal compromise and liturgical latinization, not integral conversion. St. Pius X teaches in Lamentabili (Prop. 55): “Simon Peter never even suspected that he had received primacy in the Church from Christ” is a condemned Modernist error; yet the conciliar sect acts as if the Primacy is negotiable. The “priest” Fawadleh speaks of “preserving the Christian presence” as a “shared responsibility” with schismatics. This is communicatio in sacris forbidden by divine law. The true Church, as Pius XI teaches, “demands for itself by a right belonging to it, which it cannot renounce, full freedom and independence from secular authority”—and a fortiori from false religions.
Silence on the Supernatural Order: The Gravest Accusation
Read the interview carefully. There is zero mention of: the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (the Novus Ordo “table of assembly” is not the Mass); the Sacraments (Baptism, Confirmation, Extreme Unction for the dying); the State of Grace; the Conversion of the Jews and Muslims to the one true Faith; the Final Judgment; Hell; or the Indulgence attached to the true Jubilee (not the 2033 modernist fabrication). The “priest” says: “We firmly believe that prayer works miracles.” Which prayer? The Rosary? The Traditional Liturgy? Or the vague “spirituality” of the conciliar sect? St. Pius X condemned the Modernist error (Prop. 26): “Faith, as assent of the mind, is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities.” The “hope in Christ” spoken of is stripped of its dogmatic content—Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus—and reduced to a generic theistic optimism. This is the cult of man prophesied by Pius XI: “The state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men.” True happiness comes only from subjection to the King.
The Symptomatic Level: Taybeh as a Metaphor for the Conciliar Sect
The plight of Taybeh—surrounded by enemies, abandoned by the world, clinging to a “presence” without power—is the perfect icon of the conciliar sect itself. It has abandoned the City of God for the city of man. It seeks protection from “diplomatic missions” and “international law” (Syllabus Prop. 39: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits”—a proposition the sect implicitly accepts by begging the State for rights). It has replaced the Sword of the Spirit with press releases on Vatican News. The “priest” fears families will “abandon their land.” The true shepherd fears souls will abandon the Faith. The conciliar sect, having lost the Faith at Vatican II, can only manage the retreat of its demographic remnants. The “2033 Jubilee” mentioned is the Jubilee of the Antichrist, celebrating two millennia of a “Jesus” stripped of His Kingship, His Sacrifice, and His exclusive Salvific mediation. As Pius XI warned: “When all willingly accept the reign of Christ and obey Him, and every tongue will confess that our Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father.” Until then, “so many wounds can be healed” only by the restoration of the Reign of Christ, not by the humanitarian pleas of a false priest to a false pope in a false church.
Source:
West Bank Christians feel ‘forgotten’ over settler violence (vaticannews.va)
Date: 10.08.2026