The EWTN News portal, the English-language mouthpiece of the conciliar sect’s media apparatus, reports on August 20, 2026, that Colombian Representative Luis Miguel López Aristizábal has introduced a bill to ban surrogacy, framed as a measure against “reproductive exploitation” and the commodification of children. The legislation, backed by a coalition spanning the Liberal, Conservative, and leftist “Historic Pact” parties, penalizes promoters and clinics with 10–16 years imprisonment but explicitly exempts the surrogate mother from criminal liability, declaring her the legal mother. The event was stage-managed with Olivia Maurel, a self-described “surrogacy-born activist” and spokeswoman for the Masonic-inspired “Casablanca Declaration.” This initiative, hailed by the neo-church’s propaganda organ as a victory, reduces the abominable crime of surrogacy—a sin crying to heaven for vengeance—to a mere administrative violation of humanitarian norms, utterly silencing the rights of God and the thunder of the Sixth Commandment.
The Naturalistic Frame: Human Rights Replace Divine Rights
The cited article reveals the thoroughly naturalistic anthropology animating this legislative effort. The bill’s explanatory statement cites the Constitutional Court’s rulings regarding “fundamental rights of the pregnant women and the children,” employing the vernacular of the 1948 Masonic Universal Declaration of Human Rights rather than the language of the Syllabus Errorum or Quas Primas. Representative López Aristizábal laments that Colombia has become a destination for “reproductive tourism” where couples “buy babies,” focusing on the commercial exploitation—”more than 85% of the profits… remain with the clinics”—rather than the malum in se of the act itself. This is the hallmark of the conciliar era: the substitution of justitia (rendering to God His due) with humanitarianism (managing human welfare). As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas, “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” A law that punishes the broker but absolves the woman who rents her womb for the gestation of a child conceived in vitro—often for sodomites—is not a law of justice; it is a regulatory framework for managed depravity.
The Linguistic Camouflage: “Altruistic or Commercial” Evil
The text states the bill establishes the offense of “reproductive exploitation through surrogacy — whether altruistic or commercial.” This distinction is a theological trap. By condemning the “commercial” aspect while implicitly legitimizing the “altruistic” structure of the crime (the separation of procreation from the conjugal act, the instrumentalization of the female body, the fragmentation of motherhood into genetic, gestational, and social categories), the legislation accepts the premises of the Culture of Death. The vocabulary—”surrogate,” “gestational carrier,” “reproductive tourism,” “vulnerable women”—is the Newspeak of the neo-church and its Masonic overlords. Nowhere does the article, nor the bill it describes, use the words adultery, fornication, crime against nature, sacrilege, or mortal sin. The “neo-church” reporter, Eduardo Berdejo, a veteran of covering the usurpers “Francis” and his predecessors, transmits this sterile bureaucratic language without a whisper of Catholic moral theology. This silence is the modus operandi of the conciliar sect: lex orandi, lex credendi—the law of their praying (or reporting) is the law of their believing, and they believe in the secular city, not the City of God.
Theological Bankruptcy: The Sixth Commandment Erased
From the perspective of integral Catholic doctrine—Casti Connubii (1930), the Council of Trent, the Catechism of the Council of Trent—surrogacy is a concatenation of grave evils. It necessarily involves fecundatio in vitro (IVF), which the Holy Office condemned in 1949 and 1956 as intrinsically evil (malum in se) because it separates the unitive and procreative ends of the marital act, replaces the conjugal act with a laboratory procedure, and treats the child as a product of technology. The “surrogate” then gestates a child who is not her own by nature, often for a “same-sex couple” (sodomites) or a single man, as the article explicitly notes regarding the Tammuz Family agency. This is not merely “exploitation”; it is a satanic parody of the Incarnation and the Holy Family. The child is conceived without a human act of love, gestated by a hired vessel, and delivered to those who have no natural right to him. The bill’s provision that “for all legal purposes, the mother… is the woman who carries and gives birth to them” is a slender reed of natural law grasped by positive law, but it fails to address the status of the child conceived in sin, the invalidity of the “intended parents'” claim, or the spiritual ruin of all participants. St. Paul teaches: “Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind… shall possess the kingdom of God” (1 Cor 6:9-10). The “neo-church” media reports on a bill that protects the “vulnerable woman” but leaves her soul—and the souls of the “intended parents” and the doctors—in the hands of the devil.
The Symptomatic Level: The Conciliar Sect as Handmaid of the Secular State
The involvement of Olivia Maurel and the “Casablanca Declaration for the universal abolition of surrogacy” exposes the ecumenical, inter-religious, Masonic engine driving this legislation. The “Casablanca Declaration” is a product of the UN/NGO complex, seeking a “universal abolition” based on “human dignity” abstracted from the Creator. The fact that the bill is backed by the “Historic Pact” (the party of the socialist president Gustavo Petro) alongside “Conservatives” demonstrates the concordia discors of the post-conciliar world: the left provides the “human rights” rhetoric, the “right” provides the “family values” veneer, and the “neo-church” (EWTN/ACI Prensa) provides the nihil obstat. This is the abomination of desolation foretold: the “Church of the New Advent” collaborating with the City of Man to build a Tower of Babel made of humanitarian bricks. The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns the proposition: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). Here, the “pontiff’s” media outlet reconciles itself to a liberal, Masonic legislative victory, celebrating a law that manages the symptoms of the revolution while leaving the revolutionary principles intact. The true Church, the Ecclesia militans, would demand the criminalization of all parties to this crime, the excommunication of the “clinics” (often run by “Catholic” institutions in the conciliar sect), the public reparation for the scandal, and the proclamation of the Social Kingship of Christ over Colombian legislation. Instead, we get a press release from ACI Prensa. Quas Primas declares: “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders… who are indeed the most valiant helpers of the Pastors of the Church… The annual celebration of this solemnity will also remind states that not only private individuals, but also rulers and governments have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him.” Colombia’s bill honors neither Christ nor His Law; it honors the idol of “autonomy” and “consent.” The “neo-church” applauds. This is the full measure of the apostasy.
Source:
Legislator proposes bill to ban surrogacy in Colombia (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 20.08.2026