The National Catholic Register (CNA Deutsch) reports that the so-called Dicastery for Culture and Education, a department of the structures occupying the Vatican, has issued a letter dated July 6, 2026, confirming that the 2019 document Male and Female He Created Them remains the “authoritative guide” for sex education, in response to a parental petition against the Archdiocese of Hamburg’s 2025 framework Male, Female, Diverse. This framework, implemented by the usurper of the see of Hamburg, Mr. Stefan Heße, and his vicar general, Mr. Sascha-Philipp Geißler, explicitly teaches that “biological sex does not necessarily have to correspond to social identity” and claims the school must “stand on the children’s side” against parents. The Dicastery’s letter, signed by its undersecretary Mr. Matthias Ambros, pointedly refuses to condemn the Hamburg framework explicitly, creating a deliberate ambiguity that allows the gender ideology juggernaut to advance unchecked. This bureaucratic sleight of hand reveals the conciliar sect’s true nature: a paramasonic structure that pays lip service to Catholic anthropology while facilitating its demolition.
The Conciliar Church’s Schizophrenic Duplicity
The cited article lays bare the systemic schizophrenia of the post-conciliar establishment. On one hand, the “Vatican” issues a 2019 document rejecting “gender ideology” in the “spirit of respectful dialogue”—a phrase redolent of the hermeneutic of continuity that masks rupture. On the other, a “diocese” in Germany, the epicenter of the Synodal Way apostasy, imposes a framework drafted under the influence of the sexologist Uwe Sielert, a proponent of the Kinseyian revolution, and the “Dicastery” responds with a non-committal letter that changes nothing on the ground. This is not a contradiction; it is a strategy. The modus operandi of the neo-church since 1958 has been duplex veritas (double truth): a conservative document for the periphery, a revolutionary praxis for the center. As St. Pius X condemned in Lamentabili sane exitu (1907), the Modernist “does not deny, he reinterprets.” The 2019 document is the reinterpretation that preserves the vocabulary of nature while emptying it of substance; the Hamburg framework is the substance unleashed.
The Hamburg Framework: A Manifesto of Gender Ideology
The framework Male, Female, Diverse is not a pastoral guideline; it is a theological poison. It defines sexuality as “general life energy,” a pagan vitalism straight from the Gnostic playbook, denying the teleology of the generative faculty ordained by the Creator. The assertion that “biological sex does not necessarily have to correspond to social identity” is a formal heresy against the defined dogma of the unity of the human person—body and soul—created male and female (Gen. 1:27; Council of Vienne, 1312). Furthermore, the claim that the school must “stand on the children’s side” against parents is a usurpation of the ius divinum of parents (Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1117; Pius XI, Divini Illius Magistri, 1929). This is the Staatspädagogik of the Third Reich and the GDR resurrected under a “Catholic” label. The “broad approval” cited by the archdiocese’s spokesman, Mr. Christoph Schommer, from a “general parents’ council” is the manufactured consensus of a totalitarian system that has long since purged dissenting voices.
The 2019 Document: A Compromised Bulwark
The parents’ network clings to Male and Female He Created Them as a shield, yet this document itself is infected with the virus of Modernism. It speaks of “listening,” “accompanying,” and “dialogue” with an ideology that St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907) identified as the “synthesis of all heresies.” It adopts the personalist anthropology of Wojtyła (John Paul II), which shifts the foundation of morality from the lex naturalis inscribed in ontology to the “subjectivity” of the person—a shift condemned implicitly by the Syllabus of Errors (Error 16: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation”). A document that dialoguess with error has already surrendered the truth. The Dicastery’s refusal to explicitly condemn the Hamburg framework confirms that the 2019 text was never intended as a norma normans but as a fig leaf for the abomination of desolation now standing in the holy place of Catholic schools.
The Usurpation of Parental Rights: A Violation of Natural and Divine Law
The conflict exposes the fundamental war waged by the conciliar sect against the familia, the ecclesia domestica. Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) teaches that Christ’s Kingship extends to “individuals, families, and states” and that “the state is happy not by one means, and man by another.” The Syllabus of Errors (Error 45, 47, 48) condemns the proposition that “the entire government of public schools… may and ought to appertain to the civil power” and that “Catholics may approve of the system of educating youth unconnected with Catholic faith.” The Hamburg framework, backed by the “archdiocese,” implements precisely this condemned error: it subordinates the potestas parentalis to the potestas scholastica of the state-church apparatus. The “Vatican” letter, by failing to defend the parents’ ius inalienabile, becomes complicit in the crime. Qui tacet consentire videtur (he who is silent appears to consent)—and this silence is the roar of the Antichrist.
The Invalidity of the Hamburg Hierarchy
No analysis is complete without addressing the ontological nullity of the actors. Mr. Stefan Heße, installed as “Archbishop” by the usurper Bergoglio (Francis I), derives his “mission” from a manifest heretic who, by the teaching of St. Robert Bellarmine (De Romano Pontifice) and Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code, lost his office ipso facto upon public defection from the faith. Mr. Geißler, “ordained” in the invalid Novus Ordo rite (1968) by a bishop consecrated in the invalid Pontificale Romanum of 1968 (Abp. Liénart, a known Freemason), possesses no sacramental character and no jurisdiction. Mr. Ambros, “Monsignor” of a “Dicastery” erected by the apostate constitution Praedicate Evangelium (2022), is a functionary of a paramasonic structure. They are intrusi (intruders), wolves in shepherds’ clothing (Matt. 7:15). Their “guidelines” have the force of law only in the synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9) they administer.
Symptomatic of the Great Apostasy
This episode is not an isolated “debate”; it is a symptom of the apostasia foretold (2 Thess. 2:3). The conciliar sect has replaced the Social Kingship of Christ (Pius XI, Quas Primas) with the kingship of man. The “sexuality education” is the catechesis of the new religion: anthropological self-deification. The “Vatican” letter is the limes (boundary marker) of the Great Deception: it gives the remanentes (the remnant) a document to wave while the novatores (innovators) burn the vineyard. The parents’ plea—”Do not remain silent!”—addresses a hierarchy that has been silent for sixty years while the Faith was dismantled. The only “authoritative guide” for a Catholic is the immutable Tradition and the valid Magisterium that ended with the death of Pius XII (1958). The structures in Hamburg and Rome are the abomination of desolation. Non possumus. We cannot comply. We must resist unto blood, stantes firmi in fide (standing firm in the faith), outside the camp, bearing His reproach (Heb. 13:13).
Source:
Debate About Sex Ed Guidelines for Schools in German Archdiocese Continues After Vatican Letter (ncregister.com)
Date: 22.08.2026