Vatican News portal reports that the conciliar “Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem,” Pierbattista Pizzaballa, addressed the Rimini Meeting on August 26, 2026, characterizing the West Bank as a “lawless land” and advocating for the two-state solution, “interreligious dialogue,” and a psychologized “hope” detached from the supernatural order. The “cardinal” reduces the Church’s divine mandate to diplomatic humanitarianism, silence on the Social Kingship of Christ, and the necessity of conversion for salvation. This address epitomizes the conciliar sect’s apostasy: substituting the *regnum Christi* for a Masonic parody of universal fraternity.
The Illegitimacy of the Speaker and the Stage
The very platform betrays the fraud. The “Rimini Meeting” is the annual spectacle of *Communione e Liberazione*, a movement spawned from the conciliar revolution, dedicated to the “cult of man” condemned by Pius XI in *Quas Primas*: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The speaker, Pizzaballa, holds office by appointment of the usurper “Leo XIV” (Robert Prevost), the latest in the line of antipopes beginning with John XXIII. As the *Defense of Sedevacantism* demonstrates from Bellarmine and Canon 188.4, a manifest heretic loses office *ipso facto*; the conciliar “patriarch” exercises no legitimate jurisdiction, but occupies a see usurped by the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican. His words carry no ecclesiastical weight; they are the pronouncements of a functionary in the “abomination of desolation.”
Reduction of the Church’s Mission to Naturalistic Diplomacy
Pizzaballa declares: “The West must help raise its gaze somewhat, create perspectives, and also help calm this continuing downward spiral through ever greater diplomatic efforts.” He extols diplomacy as “the only way to try to resolve the conflict while avoiding the use of weapons.” This is the heresy of *laicism* condemned in *Quas Primas*: “The Church’s authority to teach men, to issue laws, to govern nations… was denied. And then, slowly, the Christian religion began to be equated with other false religions.” The “patriarch” speaks as a NGO lobbyist, not a successor of the Apostles. He ignores the *Syllabus of Errors* (Prop. 77-80) condemning the claim that “the Catholic religion should [not] be held as the only religion of the State” and that the “Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself… with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” There is no call for the conversion of Israel or the Muslim nations to the *only* Ark of Salvation; only a demand for a political “two-state solution” — a Masonic construct legitimizing religious indifferentism.
The “Two-State Solution”: A Masonic Snare Against the Kingship of Christ
Pizzaballa affirms: “The two-state solution… is the only way to recognize the right of Israelis and Palestinians to have a home in their own land.” This phrase, “reaffirmed by the Pope,” reveals the conciliar sect’s servitude to the Zionist-Masonic agenda. The *False Fatima Apparitions* file exposes the “ecumenism project”: “The imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’ (without specifying Catholicism) opens the way to religious relativism. It can serve to legitimize dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy.” Here, the “conversion” of the Holy Land is replaced by a geopolitical partition that enshrines the Talmudic state and Islamic rule side by side, excluding the *King of Kings*. Pius XI taught: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The “two-state solution” is a practical denial of this dogma. It renders Caesar the arbiter of God’s rights — a violation of the *Syllabus* (Prop. 39, 55): “The State… is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits… The Church ought to be separated from the State.”
“Interreligious Dialogue”: The Synthesis of All Heresies
Pizzaballa prefers “interreligious dialogue” because “it is believers who speak to one another, starting from their own experiences of faith.” This is the *heresy of Modernism* condemned in *Lamentabili Sane Exitu* (Prop. 16, 17, 59): “Revelation… did not cease with the Apostles… Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples.” He boasts of dialogue moving “among ordinary people” after “elites.” This is the *democratization of apostasy*. Pius XI in *Mortalium Animos* (1928) condemned such “pan-Christian” gatherings: “The Apostolic See cannot take part in them… because they are based on the false opinion that all religions are more or less good and praiseworthy.” The “patriarch” seeks “openings” and “witnesses” to overcome boundaries. The only boundary that matters — *extra Ecclesiam nulla salus* — is erased. He urges meeting “people with their own stories… not to generalize.” This is sentimentalism substituting for the *mandatum*: “Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Mt 28:19).
Psychologized “Hope” vs. Theological Virtue
The “cardinal” distinguishes hope from “everything will be fine” or “a political solution”: “Hope is something else. It arises from within… through encounters… through people… the child of faith; it is the awareness that we are not alone.” This is a *subjectivist redefinition*. St. Thomas defines hope as *certa expectatio futurae beatitudinis* — certain expectation of future beatitude, grounded in God’s power and fidelity, not human “encounters” or “vitality” of Gazan youth. Pizzaballa’s “hope” is immanentist, Pelagian: it “is born within the heart,” “presence of an encounter with Christ in the people.” This echoes *Lamentabili* (Prop. 25): “Faith, as assent of the mind, is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities.” He admits “no solution is yet visible on the horizon.” True hope does not depend on visible solutions but on *He who is faithful* (Heb 10:23). The “patriarch” offers *spes carnalis*, not *spes theologica*.
Dehumanization Rhetoric: Modernist Moralism Replaces Sin
Pizzaballa warns against the “dehumanizing logic of war”: “The other person is exorcized, because if the other is human and close to you, it becomes difficult to strike them.” “The first violence begins in the heart and in words.” This is the language of secular psychology and UNESCO, not Catholic theology. The *Syllabus* (Prop. 56, 57) condemns: “Moral laws do not stand in need of the divine sanction… civil laws may and ought to keep aloof from divine and ecclesiastical authority.” War’s brutality flows from *sin* — original and actual — not from a failure of “encounter.” The remedy is not “refusing to dehumanize” but the *conversion of heart* through grace, the acceptance of the *Sweet Yoke of Christ* (*Quas Primas*). By locating evil in “logic” and “words,” the “patriarch” exonerates the *principalities and powers* (Eph 6:12) and the specific anti-Christian ideologies (Talmudic Judaism, Islam, Masonic secularism) driving the conflict. He says “everyone feels like a victim… vicious circle.” This moral equivalence obscures the theological reality: the enemies of Christ *are* the persecutors; the faithful *are* the victims for justice’ sake (Mt 5:10).
The Cross Reduced to a Symbol of Human Failure
Asked about suffering, Pizzaballa points to the Cross as “the place where Jesus humanly fails, but which for us is the source of salvation.” “Jesus humanly fails” — this is a blasphemous kenotic heresy. Christ’s Passion was the *triumph* of the God-Man: “And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all things to myself” (Jn 12:32). *Quas Primas* cites the hymn: *Crudelis Herodes, in off. Egiph* — “He who gives the Kingdom of Heaven does not take away earthly things!” The “patriarch” presents a Christ defeated by history, consoled only by the Resurrection as a vague “source.” This is the *theologia crucis* of the Modernists, condemned by Pius X: “The Resurrection… is not properly a historical fact… was slowly inferred by Christian consciousness” (*Lamentabili*, Prop. 36). Prayer becomes mere “entrusting helplessness,” not the *potentia supplicans* of the just man (Jas 5:16).
Purification of Memory: Modernist Historical Revisionism
Pizzaballa speaks of “purification of memory”: “refusing to allow the experience of pain and injustice to determine the future… We must hand on a redeemed past to new generations.” This is the *hermeneutic of rupture* applied to history. The *Syllabus* (Prop. 5, 58) condemns: “Divine revelation is imperfect… subject to continual and indefinite progress… Truth changes with man.” The “patriarch” implies the historical narratives of Jews, Muslims, and Christians are equally valid “interpretations” — none to be denied. This denies the *objective truth* of Redemption history. The only “redeemed past” is the *Historia Salutis* centered on the Incarnation and the Church’s mission. To “purify memory” by silencing the *Deicide* (1 Thess 2:15) and the *perpetual enmity* of the Synagogue against the Church (St. Augustine, *Contra Faustum*) is to betray the Martyrs and the *Depositum Fidei*.
Silence on the Supernatural: The Gravest Accusation
Nowhere does Pizzaballa mention: the *Holy Sacrifice of the Mass*, the *Sacraments*, *Sanctifying Grace*, *Mortal Sin*, *Hell*, *Purgatory*, *Heaven*, the *Blessed Virgin Mary*, *St. Joseph*, the *Conversion of the Jews* (Rom 11:25-26), the *Social Kingship of Christ the King*, the *Rights of God* violated by the Talmudic state, the *duty of Catholic states* to profess the true religion (*Quas Primas*, *Immortale Dei*, *Libertas*). He speaks of “passion, which is contagious,” “joy and friendship.” This is the *Religion of Humanity* of Comte, the *cult of man* Pius XI warned against. The *Syllabus* (Prop. 3, 4) condemns: “Human reason… is the sole arbiter of truth… All the truths of religion proceed from the innate strength of human reason.” Pizzaballa’s address is a masterpiece of *naturalism* — the “plague that poisons human society” (*Quas Primas*).
Conclusion: The Conciliar Sect as the Antichrist’s Advance Guard
The “cardinal’s” performance at Rimini is not a pastoral act but a political theater for the “neo-church.” It confirms the *Defense of Sedevacantism* thesis: the conciliar hierarchy, from the usurper “Leo XIV” down, are *manifest heretics* who have *ipso facto* lost all jurisdiction. They propagate the “synthesis of all heresies” (Modernism) under the guise of “dialogue,” “hope,” and “peace.” True peace — *Pax Christi in Regno Christi* — comes only from the *restoration of all things in Christ* (Eph 1:10), the *conversion of nations*, the *re-establishment of the Catholic Confessional State*, and the *rejection of the Masonic world order*. The “lawless land” is not the West Bank; it is the *Vatican occupied by the abomination of desolation*. *Viva Cristo Rey!*
Source:
Cardinal Pizzaballa: The West Bank is a 'lawless land' (vaticannews.va)
Date: 27.08.2026