The EWTN News portal, through its Portuguese-language service ACI Digital, reports that the conciliar “archbishop” of Aracaju, Josafá Menezes da Silva, has issued a decree regulating the use of artificial intelligence in archdiocesan communications. The norms, addressed to “priests, deacons, lay ministers, and the entire people of God,” lean entirely on the magisterium of the antipopes—specifically the encyclical Magnifica Humanitas and the World Communications Day message of the usurper “Leo XIV” (Robert Prevost), the document Antiqua et Nova signed by the antipope “Francis,” and a reflection by a Neapolitan “priest” of the neo-church. The decree mandates human review of AI-generated content, labeling of synthetic media, and prohibits the simulation of clerical faces and voices. This bureaucratic exercise in digital hygiene, devoid of any reference to the rights of Christ the King or the salvation of souls, perfectly encapsulates the naturalistic reductionism of the conciliar sect.
The Conciliar Sect’s Obsession with Technocratic Management
The cited article reveals the true deity of the post-conciliar hierarchy: technocratic procedure. The “archbishop” Menezes da Silva does not issue a pastoral letter warning against the spiritual dangers of a technology that simulates reality, usurps the image of God in man, and serves the architecture of the Antichrist. Instead, he produces a compliance manual. The document reads like a corporate data-protection policy: “mandatory human review,” “labeled and clearly distinguished,” “auxiliary tool in nine situations.” This is the lex ecclesiae of the Church of the New Advent—a soulless bureaucracy managing the “human capital” of a false religion. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas, “the Kingdom of Christ encompasses all men… individuals, families, or states.” The conciliar sect, by contrast, reduces the Church to a mere NGO managing communication protocols.
Authority Derived from Usurpers and Modernist Dicasteries
The decree explicitly grounds its legitimacy in the “message for the 60th World Communications Day and the encyclical Magnifica Humanitas, both by Pope Leo XIV,” and the note Antiqua et Nova “signed by Pope Francis.” Here is the fons et origo of the error. Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”) and Jorge Bergoglio (“Francis”) are manifest heretics who, by the very fact of their public defection from the Catholic Faith, have lost all jurisdiction ipso facto (Canon 188 §4, 1917 Code; St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice II, 30). As Bellarmine teaches: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member.” The “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith” and the “Dicastery for Culture and Education” are organs of a paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican, devoid of canonical mission. To cite them as authoritative is to build on sand. The “archbishop” Menezes da Silva, by recognizing these usurpers as legitimate superiors, demonstrates his own adhesion to the great apostasy foretold in 2 Thessalonians 2:3.
Anthropocentrism Masquerading as “Human Dignity”
The article quotes the “archbishop”: “The starting point for all the Church’s reflection on artificial intelligence is the unconditional defense of the dignity of the human person.” This is the heresy of anthropocentrism condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis and the Syllabus of Pius IX (Error 3: “Human reason… is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood”). The conciliar sect has replaced the prima veritas—the rights of God—with the secunda veritas—the “dignity of man” abstracted from his supernatural end. The document Antiqua et Nova is cited for placing “human dignity at the center of discernment.” But Salus animarum suprema lex (the salvation of souls is the supreme law). A “dignity” that ignores the status naturae lapsae and the necessity of grace for salvation is a Masonic phantom. The “archbishop” speaks of “preserving faces and voices” but is silent on preserving the imago Dei restored by baptism and the state of grace.
Silence on the Supernatural: The Gravest Accusation
Read the decree again. There is not a single word on:
- The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary) which the conciliar “liturgy” has reduced to a Protestantized assembly.
- The Sacraments as channels of grace.
- The Final Judgment, Heaven, Hell, or Purgatory.
- The Social Kingship of Christ over Brazil and all nations.
- The duty of the State to profess the Catholic Faith (Pius XI, Quas Primas: “Rulers of states… have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him”).
The “archbishop” prohibits “deepfakes” of clerical faces but says nothing about the deepfake of the papacy sitting in Rome. He forbids “simulating the voice of a bishop… in a message not originally delivered by them” while he himself simulcasts the voice of the Antichrist by enforcing the novelties of the “Second Vatican Council.” This is hypocrisy in excelsis. The Syllabus (Error 55) condemns the separation of Church and State; the conciliar sect enforces it by reducing the Church’s voice to a whisper on “digital ethics.”
AI as a Tool of the “Abomination of Desolation”
The decree treats AI as a neutral “auxiliary tool” for “creating backgrounds, textures, abstract elements, illustrations.” This is culpable naivety or deliberate blindness. AI is the instrumentum regni of the coming Antichrist—a system of total surveillance, algorithmic control, and synthetic reality designed to replace the ordo veritatis with the ordo technocraticus. The “archbishop” warns against “parallel realities” and “digital fraud” (citing the antipope “Leo XIV”), yet he inhabits the greatest parallel reality of all: a false church with false sacraments, a false hierarchy, and a false magisterium. The Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907) condemned the Modernist proposition that “Truth changes with man” (Prop. 58). The conciliar sect’s embrace of AI “ethics” is the practical application of that condemned evolutionism: truth is now what the algorithm verifies, not what God reveals.
The Patroness Invoked: A Final Irony
The decree concludes with a prayer to “Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception… [to] help us preserve, in every communication, the dignity and beauty of human faces and voices called to reflect Christ.” The Immaculate Conception is the Terror Demonum, the Crusher of Heresies. She cannot be the patroness of a structure that dialogues with the enemies of her Son, that places “human dignity” above the Regnum Christi, and that legitimizes the usurpation of the Holy See. The true Church, Ecclesia militans, endures in the catacombs of Tradition, preserving the depositum fidei intact, awaiting the restoration of all things in Christ (Instaurare omnia in Christo). The “Archdiocese of Aracaju” is but a branch of the neo-church, withering on the vine because it has severed itself from the True Vine (John 15:6).
Source:
Brazil archbishop establishes rules for use of AI in archdiocesan communications (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 31.08.2026