The Vatican News portal reports on the press conference held by the French episcopate of the conciliar sect regarding the upcoming “apostolic journey” of the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) to France from September 25 to 28, 2026. Cardinal Jean-Marc Aveline, the “archbishop” of Marseille and president of the French “bishops’ conference” (CEF), boasts of his maneuvering to secure the visit within a four-month window opened by the cancellation of a trip to Peru. The itinerary reveals a meticulously staged humanitarian spectacle: a €27 million budget, events at the Stade de France and Place de la Concorde, a “pilgrimage” to Lourdes, an interreligious youth vigil featuring a traveling circus, and a political homage to the Masonic architect of the European Union, Robert Schuman. The motto “That the world may have life” is explicitly detached from the Social Kingship of Christ the King. This grotesque parody of a papal visit exposes the conciliar sect not as the Bride of Christ, but as a paramasonic NGO servicing the religion of man.
The Usurper’s Itinerary: A Masonic Pilgrimage Through the Ruins of the Eldest Daughter
The very concept of an “apostolic journey” by the antipope Leo XIV is a juridical and theological impossibility. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice). The line of usurpers beginning with John XXIII has occupied the Vatican structures, transforming the Holy See into the headquarters of the abomination of desolation. Robert Prevost, elevated by the same modernist conclave that produced Bergoglio, possesses no jurisdiction, no mission, and no authority. His “journey” is not missio canonica but a geopolitical tour by the head of a false religion.
Cardinal Aveline’s admission—“I proposed the idea… I went to speak with the person who manages the Pope’s schedule… ‘Then forget Peru, let’s do France. I’ll take care of the rest'”—reveals the purely bureaucratic, horizontal nature of this enterprise. There is no supernatural mandate, only diplomatic scheduling. The “enormous challenge” of four months’ preparation for a €27 million spectacle (with a paltry €5.5 million raised) mirrors the worldly logic of the City of Man, not the City of God. The “Gel Evans agency” manages the “welcome” like a rock concert. This is the opus humanum of the conciliar sect: logistics replacing liturgy, marketing replacing martyrdom.
The Motto of Death: “That the world may have life” Without the Life Who Is Christ
The motto, drawn from John 10:10, is wrenched from its soteriological context. Aveline admits the bishops initially sought a motto about “peace” but switched when it clashed with the Lebanon trip. The final choice was ratified by the antipope via email. This procedural triviality aside, the theological content is vaporized. Aveline states: “When one reads the encyclical Magnifica Humanitas, he noted, ‘you can see that it is about defending the dignity of human life in all situations in which that dignity may be threatened.'”
Here lies the heresy of humanism condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The “defense of human dignity” severed from the reign of Christ the King is the precise definition of laicism—the “plague that poisons human society” identified by Pius XI. The assisted-suicide bill is mentioned only to be neutralized: Aveline “ruled out any political interpretation” while claiming the motto addresses it. This is the hermeneutic of rupture in action: the Church’s voice is silenced on the specific moral evil (murder of the innocent) to serve a vague, secular “dignity” compatible with the Masonic Republic’s “lay” (godless) order.
Pius IX’s Syllabus condemns the proposition: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55). Aveline’s declaration—“It is important to remember that we are in a lay Republic. The state does not recognize any religion, but it guarantees that different faith communities can publicly express their faith”—is a formal adhesion to this condemned error. The “authorization” sought from secular authorities for Place de la Concorde and the Champs-Élysées signifies the total subjection of the sacred to the profane. The “eldest daughter of the Church” is now a prostitute of the Republic.
Lourdes: The Grotto Profaned by a False Shepherd
The visit to Lourdes is the most diabolical stage. Bishop Micas describes the antipope’s program: “He will touch the rock, drink the water, light a candle, kneel down and pray in silence, as pilgrims do in Lourdes.” This is a mimetic farce. The true Pope St. Pius X, in Lamentabili sane exitu, condemned the Modernist proposition: “The Church listening cooperates… the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (Prop. 6). The antipope comes not as Vicar of Christ to confirm the brethren in the faith, but as a “pilgrim” among pilgrims, leveling the hierarchy of grace. He “presides over the Marian candlelight procession and celebrate[s] Mass”—but the Novus Ordo Missae is a Protestantized meal, invalid in form and intention, a “table of assembly” that denies the propitiatory Sacrifice of Calvary. His kneeling is not adoration of the True God but participation in the cult of man.
The context file on False Fatima Apparitions demonstrates the Masonic manipulation of Marian phenomena. While Lourdes retains a validity Fatima lacks, its appropriation by the conciliar sect transforms it into a stage for the Church of the New Advent. The 50,000 expected attendees are not fed the Bread of Angels but the poison of religious indifferentism.
Interreligious Syncretism at the Stade de France: The Synagogue of Satan in Action
The youth vigil at the Stade de France epitomizes the pest of indifferentism (Syllabus, Errors 15-18). Bishop Guillet reports: “These same young people have invited Jewish, Muslim, Sikh and Hindu friends. ‘They live together throughout the year and felt the desire to share this great moment.'” Thirty artists from a “traveling circus—’Christians and non-Christians'” will perform. This is not evangelization; it is the parliament of religions condemned by Pius XI: “The Christian religion began to be equated with other false religions and shamelessly placed in the same category” (Quas Primas).
The Syllabus anathematizes: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” (Error 16). The “coordinator” Bishop Bertrand calls the preparation “magnificent simply because of its preparation and the enthusiasm it has generated among so many people.” The criterion of truth has become “enthusiasm” and “numbers”—vox populi, vox dei inverted. The silence on Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, on the necessity of Baptism and the Catholic Faith for salvation, is the loudest scream of apostasy. The “safe home” rhetoric regarding abuse survivors (see below) is the only “dogma” this sect enforces.
The Abuse Meeting: Therapeutic Theater Replacing Canonical Justice
The meeting with seven abuse survivors is orchestrated for maximum media impact. Bishop Bozo states: “What determined the choice… was the Holy Father’s own desire that this be a truly interpersonal encounter… a group of seven people was chosen.” Selected by the CEF and the “Conference of Religious Men and Women” after consulting “around forty groups,” the victims are curated for “balanced representation”—“men and women who experienced abuse both as minors and as adults, in school and parish settings.” The excluded are offered a “written statement.”
This is not the Church’s justice. The true Church, per Canon 188.4 (1917 Code), declares that a cleric who “publicly defects from the Catholic faith” loses office ipso facto. The “clergy” of the conciliar sect, by their public profession of Modernism, religious liberty, and false ecumenism, have ipso facto vacated their offices. They possess no jurisdiction to judge, govern, or bind. The “meeting” is a therapeutic session replacing the canonical process. It serves the narrative of “transparency” and “listening”—the language of the world—while the supernatural reality of scandal, sacrilege, and the loss of the faith by the hierarchy itself remains unaddressed. The “safe home” is a secular safeguarding slogan; the true safe home is the ark of salvation outside of which there is no remission of sins.
Metz: The Political Canonization of the Masonic European Project
The final stop in Metz reveals the geopolitical soul of the journey. Bishop Ballot declares: “Religions that engage in dialogue can contribute to building peace… the day in Metz… takes on a European and international dimension.” The antipope will “pay tribute to Schuman by delivering a message to all of Europe.” Robert Schuman, declared “Venerable” by the antipope Francis in 2021, was a principal architect of the European Coal and Steel Community, the precursor to the Masonic European Union—a political entity founded on the laicism and religious indifference condemned by the Syllabus (Errors 39, 55, 77-80).
Pius XI warned: “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders… The annual celebration of this solemnity will also remind states that not only private individuals, but also rulers and governments have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him” (Quas Primas). The conciliar sect does the opposite: it honors the Masonic builder of the anti-Christian European order. Aveline’s conclusion—“We can receive from his words a roadmap”—confirms the sect’s nature: a human institution seeking a strategic plan from its human leader, devoid of the Depositum Fidei.
Conclusion: The Spiritual Bankruptcy of the Conciliar Sect
This “apostolic journey” is a masterpiece of the Masonic operation against the Church. It combines the humanitarian reductionism of the motto, the indifferentist syncretism of the Stade de France, the sacrilegious parody at Lourdes, the therapeutic substitution for justice, and the political servility to the Masonic EU at Metz. Not one word is spoken of the Social Kingship of Christ, the conversion of France, the condemnation of laicism, the necessity of the Catholic Faith for salvation, or the propitiatory Sacrifice of the Mass.
The “spiritual thirst” Aveline diagnoses in France is real—but the conciliar sect offers only sand. As Pius XI taught: “The hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior” (Quas Primas). The antipope Leo XIV brings not the reign of Christ, but the consolidation of the reign of the Antichrist in the Vatican structures. Sede vacante remains the only Catholic position; the true Church endures in the catacombs of Tradition, preserving the Mass of Ages and the integral Faith, awaiting the restoration of all things in Christ.
Source:
French Bishops: There is a spiritual thirst in the country as it awaits the Pope (vaticannews.va)
Date: 09.09.2026