The EWTN News portal reports that on September 6, 2026, the “bishop” of Getafe, Ginés García Beltrán, performed a “Rite of Consecration to a Life of Virginity” for two laywomen — a biologist and a physician — at the Nativity of Our Lady Church in San Martín de la Vega, Spain. The ceremony, framed as a “wedding” to Christ and a “missionary” commitment, was conducted under the auspices of the post-conciliar “Dicastery for Institutes of Consecrated Life” and its instruction Ecclesiae Sponsae Imago. The women’s testimonies center on personal discernment, emotional fulfillment, and a vague “spousal” spirituality devoid of the rigorous ascetical and dogmatic framework required by the Church’s immemorial tradition. This spectacle is not a sacramental act of the Church but a liturgical simulation staged by a paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican, signifying the total collapse of the supernatural order in the conciliar sect.
Invalid Minister, Null Rite, Simulated Sacramentality
The fundamental reality obliterated by the EWTN report is that Ginés García Beltrán possesses no valid episcopal orders. Ordained and consecrated within the post-1968 Novus Ordo rite — a rite deliberately stripped of the forma and intentio necessary for the transmission of the sacerdotal and episcopal character — he is a layman masquerading as a successor of the Apostles. Pope Pius XII, in Sacramentum Ordinis (1947), defined the matter and form of Holy Orders with dogmatic precision; the 1968 Pontifical of Paul VI altered both, introducing substantial defects that render the sacrament invalid ex opere operato. As St. Alphonsus Liguori teaches, sine materia et forma debita, nullum sacramentum (without the proper matter and form, there is no sacrament). A layman cannot confer the solemn consecration of virgins, a rite reserved to the diocesan bishop in the Pontificale Romanum of 1962, which invokes the Holy Ghost through the Veni Creator Spiritus and the imposition of hands — a sacramental act requiring the fullness of the priesthood. What occurred in San Martín de la Vega was a theatrical parody, a simulacrum devoid of grace, witnessed by a congregation conditioned to mistake bureaucratic ritual for divine action.
The “Dicastery” and Ecclesiae Sponsae Imago: Modernist Legislative Fiction
The article explicitly cites the Ecclesiae Sponsae Imago (1987), an instruction of the “Dicastery for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life” — a curial organism of the conciliar sect, erected by the usurper Paul VI (Montini) as part of his systematic dismantling of the Church’s canonical and spiritual architecture. This document, like the 1983 Code of Canon Law it serves, is legally and theologically null. Canon 188 §4 of the 1917 Code, still binding on the true Church, declares that an office becomes vacant ipso facto by “public defection from the Catholic faith.” The architects and executors of the conciliar revolution — from John XXIII (Roncalli) to Leo XIV (Prevost) — have publicly defected by promulgating heresies condemned by the Syllabus of Pius IX (e.g., errors 15, 16, 17, 77, 79, 80), by Lamentabili Sane Exitu of St. Pius X (e.g., propositions 21, 22, 53, 54, 58, 59, 60, 64, 65), and by Quas Primas of Pius XI, which affirms the Social Kingship of Christ over all nations — a doctrine the conciliar sect explicitly repudiates in Dignitatis Humanae and Gaudium et Spes. Consequently, the “Dicastery” has no authority, its instructions are waste paper, and the “Ordo Virginum” it governs is a novelty unknown to Tradition, fabricated to accommodate the “lay apostolate” ideology of Apostolicam Actuositatem — a document that reduces the Church’s mission to horizontal humanitarianism.
Reduction of Virginal Consecration to Naturalistic “Mission”
The “bishop’s” homily, as reported, reveals the naturalistic deformation of the vocation. He calls it a “wedding,” a “betrothal,” and insists the fruitfulness is “not according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit” — yet immediately defines this fruitfulness as “service,” “mission,” and “readiness for whatever the Church needs,” explicitly rejecting “withdrawal into the confines of the Christian community.” This is the language of Catholic Action and lay apostolate, not of the Ordo Virginum of the Fathers. St. Ambrose, De Virginibus I.4, teaches that the consecrated virgin “non habet negotium saeculare, sed orat pro populo” (has no secular business, but prays for the people). The Pontificale Romanum (1962) prays: “Ut quae te, Domine, corpore et mente consecravit, tua semper protectione custodias” (That she who has consecrated herself to You in body and mind may be kept by Your perpetual protection). The essence is separatio a saeculo (separation from the world) and oratio assidua (assiduous prayer) — not “mission” in the sociological sense. The “bishop’s” declaration that “for a Christian, everything is mission” is a Modernist equivocation, collapsing the distinction between the munus sacerdotale (priestly office) and the munus laicale (lay state), a confusion condemned by Pius XII in Mediator Dei (1947) and by the very nature of the sacramental priesthood. The women’s role is reduced to ecclesial functionaries — “born for the service of the Church” — a phrase that would have horrified St. Agnes, St. Lucy, or St. Cecilia, whose consecration was a holocaustum (total burnt offering) to the Lamb, not a diocesan assignment.
Subjectivist Discernment: Feelings Over Faith
The testimonies of Ana Isabel García and Estefanía Ibáñez are textbook Modernist subjectivism. García “used to cry because my friends had boyfriends and I didn’t” — a psychological motive elevated to vocational sign. Ibáñez felt “a very strong desire for him” at age 13, which “marked my life,” and later “recognized her vocation within the pages” of a conciliar instruction. Nowhere is mentioned: the necessity of a valid spiritual director (a true priest), the examination of conscience according to the Examen Particulare of St. Ignatius, the testing of spirits (discretio spirituum) by the rules of St. John of the Cross, the requirement of virginitas integra (integral virginity) of body and soul verified by canonical process, the solemn vow of chastity received coram Episcopo in the traditional rite, the velatio (veiling) signifying the nuptial bond with Christ Crucified, the anulus (ring) as pledge of fidelity unto blood. The “five years of particular intensity” guided by “numerous priests” (presumably Novus Ordo presbyters, invalidly ordained) constitute no canonical formation. The Council of Trent, Session 24, Canon 6, anathematizes those who say the Church errs in establishing impediments to marriage; by parity, the Church’s immemorial discipline for consecrated virgins — rigorously codified in the 1917 Code (Canons 598-606) — cannot be discarded for a “discernment process” based on sentimental autobiography.
The “Nativity of Our Lady” Church: A Den of Liturgical Profanation
The ceremony took place in a church dedicated to the Nativity of Our Lady — a feast celebrating the Immaculate Conception’s first fruit, the Virgin Mother who “conceived by the Holy Ghost, bore without corruption, and remained a virgin forever” (Roman Breviary). Yet the “Mass” celebrated there (if the Novus Ordo was used) is the Cena Domini of Luther, a Protestantized memorial meal that denies the Propitiatory Sacrifice, the Real Presence substantialiter, and the Priesthood in persona Christi. The “bishop” likely faced the people (versus populum), used a table not an altar, recited a fabricated “Eucharistic Prayer” omitting the Roman Canon’s Hanc igitur and Nobis quoque peccatoribus, and distributed “Communion” in the hand to standing recipients — sacrilege compounded by idolatry. St. Pius X, in Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907), condemned the Modernist error that “the Church’s liturgy can be changed to suit the times” (Prop. 58, 64). The very building, if consecrated post-1968, may lack valid consecration, as the rite of dedication was also mutilated. Lex orandi, lex credendi — the law of prayer is the law of belief. The prayer of the conciliar sect is the prayer of apostasy.
EWTN and ACI Prensa: Propaganda Arms of the Abomination
The article originates from ACI Prensa, “the Spanish-language sister service of EWTN News” — a media empire founded by the late “Mother” Angelica, a Poor Clare nun who embraced the Novus Ordo, promoted the Charismatic Renewal (a Masonic infiltration documented by Fr. Francisco Putti, Il Movimento Carismatico, 1975), and built a network that normalizes the usurpers by calling them “Pope,” “Bishop,” “Cardinal” without quotation marks. EWTN’s “Catholic” identity is a marketing brand for the conciliar sect. The reporter, Nicolás de Cárdenas, “specialized in socio-religious topics” — i.e., he covers the neo-church as a sociological phenomenon, not as the Mystical Body of Christ. The article’s closing subscription prompt (“I agree to receive communications from EWTN”) confirms its commercial nature. This is not journalism; it is ecclesiastical money-laundering for a false church.
Theological Verdict: Non Est Ecclesia, Non Est Sacramentum, Non Est Gratia
From the perspective of integral Catholic faith — the faith of the Syllabus, of Pascendi, of Quas Primas, of Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio, of the 1917 Code, of the Pontificale Romanum of 1962 — this event in San Martín de la Vega is null, void, and gravely scandalous.
- No valid bishop → no valid consecration (Can. 188 §4, 1917 Code; Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice).
- No valid rite → no sacramental grace (Pius XII, Sacramentum Ordinis; Council of Trent, Sess. VII, Can. 11).
- No true Church → the “Diocese of Getafe” is a territorial fiction of the conciliar sect, a synagoga Satanae (Apoc. 2:9) occupying property stolen from the Church.
- No supernatural vocation → the women remain laywomen, bound by the duties of their state, deceived by a diabolical simulation of the velatio virginum.
The “consecration” is a signum contradictorium — a sign of contradiction that reveals the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15). The true Ordo Virginum survives only in the catacombs of the faithful remnant, under true bishops validly consecrated before 1968 (or conditionally thereafter), celebrating the Mass of All Time, keeping the Breviarium Romanum, and awaiting the Parousia of the King whose Kingdom “shall have no end” (Luke 1:33; Quas Primas, Denz. 3678).
Ecce sponsus venit, exite obviam ei (Behold the bridegroom cometh, go ye forth to meet him — Matt. 25:6). The true virgins are those who keep their lamps filled with the oil of sanctifying grace from the true Sacraments, not those who participate in the satanic pantomime of the neo-church. Vade retro me, Satana (Matt. 16:23).
Source:
A doctor and a biologist in Spain embrace life as consecrated virgins (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 09.09.2026