The EWTN News portal (September 14, 2026) reports that the “Casablanca Group of Experts” and the French NGO Juristes Pour l’Enfance have petitioned the United Nations Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, Katarina Schwarz, to formally recognize surrogate motherhood as “a new form of slavery involving women and children” under the 1926 Slavery Convention. The request cites UN bodies (Special Rapporteur on sale of children, 2018; Committee on Rights of the Child, 2019) characterizing surrogacy as the sale of children, and a July 2025 report by the Special Rapporteur on violence against women calling for eradication via a binding international instrument. The article highlights a June 2026 joint statement by states for a universal abolition moratorium. Crucially, the report invokes the authority of the Argentine usurper Jorge Bergoglio (“Pope Francis”), quoting his 2024 address to the diplomatic corps where he labeled surrogacy “deplorable,” a “grave violation of the dignity of the woman and the child,” and urged the “international community” to “prohibit this practice universally.” The “Holy See” is noted as having launched a declaration in Geneva seeking a worldwide moratorium. This spectacle of the conciliar sect begging the Masonic United Nations for a humanitarian concession constitutes a capitulation to the secular city and a betrayal of the Social Kingship of Christ the King, reducing the immutable divine law to a negotiable item on a globalist agenda.
The Naturalistic Frame: Slavery Defined by Geneva, Not by God
The entire petition rests upon the 1926 Geneva Convention definition of slavery: “the exercise of the attributes of the right of ownership.” This is a purely juridical, naturalistic construct, devoid of any reference to the lex divina or the lex naturalis as understood by the Church. By anchoring the argument in a Masonic-era international treaty—negotiated by the very “synagogue of Satan” condemned by Pius IX in the Syllabus (Error 39: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits”)—the petitioners implicitly accept the sovereignty of the secular order over the definition of moral evil. Surrogacy is not an abomination because it violates a 1926 convention; it is an abomination because it is a crime against the Creator’s order, a violation of the sixth and ninth commandments, an assault on the bonum prolis and the sacramentum matrimonii, reducing the human person—imago Dei—to a commodity manufactured by technology. The article’s silence on sin, divine judgment, and the eternal destiny of souls is the gravest accusation: it frames a spiritual catastrophe as a human rights violation.
Linguistic Complicity: The Vocabulary of the “World”
The rhetoric deployed—”dignity,” “exploitation,” “human rights,” “international community,” “binding instrument,” “moratorium”—is the Newspeak of the Masonic Republic. The article speaks of the “child in utero reduced to an object of disposal” and the woman’s body “subjected to the will of third parties.” While factually true, the language is therapeutic and managerial, not prophetic and doctrinal. There is no mention of peccatum clamans ad caelum (sin crying to heaven for vengeance), no reference to Casti Connubii (Pius XI, 1930) which condemns “any use whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life.” The petitioners speak the language of the Civitas Terrena, seeking a modus vivendi with the Antichrist’s structure (the UN), rather than proclaiming the Civitas Dei. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed, because the main reason why some have the right to command and others have the duty to obey was removed.” By petitioning the UN, the neo-church acknowledges the UN as the legitimate lawgiver.
The Theological Bankruptcy: Antipope Bergoglio as “Moral Authority”
The citation of Jorge Bergoglio (“Pope Francis”) as a moral authority is the smoking gun of the great apostasy. According to the unchanging doctrine of the Church, codified by Pope Paul IV in Cum ex Apostolatus Officio (1559) and affirmed by St. Robert Bellarmine (De Romano Pontifice), a manifest heretic loses the papacy ipso facto, without need of declaration. Bellarmine states: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member; now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian.” Bergoglio, a public adherent of religious liberty (condemned by Quanta Cura and Syllabus Error 15), false ecumenism, and the idolatrous Pachamama rites, is a manifest heretic and apostate. He is not the Vicar of Christ; he is a usurper of the Chair of Peter. The “Holy See” referenced in the article is the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican, the “abomination of desolation” (Matt 24:15) foretold by Our Lord. When EWTN News quotes this antipope urging the “international community” to act, it commits idolatry of the false hierarchy, presenting a wolf in shepherd’s clothing as the voice of the Good Shepherd. The true Church does not ask the UN for a “moratorium”; she condemns the evil ex cathedra and commands the faithful to resist unto death.
Symptomatic Analysis: The Conciliar Church as Handmaid of the New World Order
This episode is the perfect icon of the conciliar revolution. The Second Vatican Council’s Gaudium et Spes and Dignitatis Humanae surrendered the Church’s potestas indirecta in temporalibus and embraced the secularist dogma of religious liberty. The result is the “Church of the New Advent” functioning as an NGO with a sacramental veneer, lobbying the United Nations—the very instrument of the Mysterium Iniquitatis for a one-world government—alongside “Casablanca Experts” and French jurists. The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns (Error 55): “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” The conciliar sect has not only accepted this separation; it has prostrated itself before the State, begging for crumbs of “human rights” legislation. The “joint statement by states” and the “Holy See” declaration in Geneva represent the ecumenism of the anti-Christ: a unity of purpose between the whore of Babylon (the UN system) and the false prophet (the conciliar hierarchy) to manage the slaughter of the innocents via “regulated abolition” rather than divine prohibition. The “Casablanca Declaration” experts and Juristes Pour l’Enfance are useful idiots—or willing collaborators—in this theater, providing a secular “human rights” alibi for the neo-church’s dereliction of its munus docendi and munus regendi.
The Only Remedy: The Social Kingship of Christ the King
The only solution to the horror of surrogacy—and the entire culture of death—is not a UN treaty, but the restoration of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all nations, as Pius XI commanded in Quas Primas: “Peace is only possible in the kingdom of Christ… Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ.” The State must confess the Catholic Faith officially, prohibit all attacks on natural and divine law (abortion, contraception, surrogacy, sodomy) under pain of criminal sanction, and submit its legislation to the regula fidei of the true Church. The faithful must reject the false shepherds of the conciliar sect, withdraw from their compromised structures, and adhere to the perennial Magisterium preserved by bishops and priests who retain valid orders and jurisdiction (or supplied jurisdiction in necessity) outside the neo-church. Non est alia salus (Acts 4:12). The petition to the UN is not a victory for life; it is a certificate of death for the conciliar religion, proving it has no power but that which it receives from the world (John 19:11).
Source:
UN asked to recognize surrogate motherhood as a new form of slavery (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 14.09.2026