The National Catholic Register (NCR), drawing from Catholic News Agency (CNA), reports that the Dicastery for Divine Worship of the conciliar sect issued thirty-four permissions in 2025 for the celebration of the 1962 Missal in parish churches, a figure identical to 2024, with twenty-four concessions granted to dioceses in the United States. Seven decrees were issued under the antipope Francis before his death on April 21, 2025, and twenty-seven under his successor, the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), elected May 8. The vast majority were mere renewals of existing two-year indults. This bureaucratic continuity demonstrates that the Traditionis Custodes regime remains the operational law of the neo-church, and that the indult communities function as a controlled opposition, legitimizing the usurpers of the Holy See while the true Mass remains suppressed in the structures of the abomination of desolation.
The Illusion of Legitimacy: Bureaucratic Control as Ecclesiastical Tyranny
The cited article treats the Summarium Decretorum — the annual index of decrees from the Dicastery for Divine Worship — as a legitimate barometer of ecclesiastical health. From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, this document is nothing less than the ledger of a paramasonic occupation. The very concept that a diocesan “bishop” must petition Rome for permission to celebrate the immemorial Mass of the ages in a parish church inverts the divine constitution of the Church. Lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi (the law of praying is the law of believing is the law of living). The Mass is not a privilege granted by a human authority; it is the actus supremus of the Church’s worship, the right and duty of every validly ordained priest. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas, Christ the King possesses all power in heaven and on earth (Matt. 28:18), and His royal authority extends over the liturgy, which no “pope” or “dicastery” can restrict, regulate, or ration. The requirement of an indult — a facultas granted by a usurper — reduces the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary to a concession of the neo-church’s administrative apparatus, a table of assembly managed by bureaucrats.
The article notes the “case-by-case handling of requests” as evidence of pastoral care. In reality, this is the modus operandi of tyranny: divide et impera. By granting permissions sparingly, temporarily (two years), and conditionally, the conciliar sect keeps the indult communities in a state of perpetual dependency and fear, ensuring their silence on the heresies of Vatican II, the invalidity of the Novus Ordo, and the vacancy of the Holy See. The “continuity” between Francis and Leo XIV highlighted by the report is not a sign of stability; it is the signature of the same Masonic plot — the seamless transition of the abomination of desolation from one antipope to the next.
The 1962 Missal: A Compromised Rite Already Infected by Modernism
The article describes the 1962 Missal as “based on that promulgated by St. Pius V but was revised by St. John XXIII in 1962,” presenting this as a neutral historical fact. This is a deliberate obfuscation. The 1962 Missal is not the pure Tridentine Mass codified by St. Pius V (Quo Primum, 1570). It incorporates the corrupted Holy Week reforms of 1955/1956 under Pius XII — the first liturgical revolution — and the rubrical changes of John XXIII (the insertion of St. Joseph into the Canon, the suppression of the Confiteor before Communion, the alteration of the Ordo Missae rubrics). These changes were the trojan horse for the Novus Ordo Missae of 1969. To celebrate the 1962 Missal today, under the authority of the conciliar sect, is to celebrate a liturgical hybrid — a rite already stripped of its integral integrity, offered on altars often stripped of their sacred orientation, by priests often formed in the seminaries of the revolution, in communion with a hierarchy that has defected from the Faith.
The article’s mention of the priest celebrating “ad orientem — facing liturgical east rather than the congregation” is a superficial marker used to placate the faithful. The orientation of the body means nothing if the intentio and the communio are with the neo-church. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, a manifest heretic cannot be the head of the Church (De Romano Pontifice), and the “bishops” granting or receiving these indults are manifest heretics by their adherence to Vatican II’s errors on religious liberty, ecumenism, and collegiality. A Mass offered in union with them — even the 1962 form — is vitiated by the defect of communion. It is not the Mass of the Catholic Church; it is the Mass of the secta conciliaris.
Traditionis Custodes: The Antipope’s Decree to Suppress the Immemorial Mass
The article references Traditionis Custodes (2021) as a “restriction” requiring permissions. This motu proprio of the antipope Francis is a manifestly heretical and schismatic act. It claims to abrogate the immemorial right of priests to celebrate the Mass of St. Pius V, substituting the Novus Ordo as the “unique expression” of the Roman Rite. This is a direct assault on the Kingship of Christ over the liturgy. Pius XI, in Quas Primas, condemns the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism” which “began with the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations.” Traditionis Custodes is the ecclesiastical laicism par excellence: the denial of Christ’s reign over the sanctuary, the substitution of the divine liturgy with a human fabrication, the enthronement of the “community” in place of the Victim.
The fact that the neo-church’s “Dicastery” continues to issue permissions under this tyrannical law proves that the indult system is not a restoration but a management of the suppression. The thirty-four dioceses are not “free”; they are on a leash. The “renewal for an additional two years” is the chain of the slave. As the Syllabus of Pius IX condemns (Error 55): “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” The conciliar sect has inverted this: it has become a department of the Masonic world-state, regulating Catholic worship as a concession of religious liberty — the very error condemned in Quanta Cura and the Syllabus.
Indult Communities: Collaborators in the Occupation of the Sanctuary
The article’s focus on “dioceses” receiving permissions obscures the reality: these are primarily indult communities (Ecclesia Dei institutes, diocesan TLM parishes) that have accepted the Traditionis Custodes framework. By petitioning for and accepting these two-year indults, they formally recognize the legitimacy of the usurpers. They acknowledge the authority of the “Dicastery,” the validity of the “pope’s” legislation, and the jurisdiction of the “bishops.” This is schism in practice: separation from the true Church (which holds the integral Faith and valid sacraments without need of permission) and union with the counter-church.
The Defense of Sedevacantism establishes that a manifest heretic loses his office ipso facto (De Romano Pontifice, Bellarmine). The “bishops” of the 34 dioceses — Sacramento, Nashville, Lincoln, Davenport, Cleveland, Seattle, etc. — are manifest heretics by their public profession of the Vatican II religion. They have no jurisdiction. Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code (cited in the Defense file) states that an office becomes vacant by “public defection from the Catholic faith.” These men have defected. Therefore, their “permissions” are null, void, and of no effect (Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Paul IV). The priests operating under them have no faculties from the Church. The faithful attending these Masses are not assisting at a Catholic liturgy in the proper sense; they are participating in a simulacrum staged within the structures of the abomination.
The article mentions the “Archdiocese of Seattle” among the recipients. This is the see of the antipope’s appointee, a clear signal that the indult is a tool of containment, not liberation. The “Lincoln, Nebraska” reference is often held up by pseudo-traditionalists as a bastion; yet even there, the “bishop” petitioned Rome for a concession, implicitly accepting the Traditionis Custodes yoke. Qui tacet consentire videtur (he who is silent seems to consent).
The American Nexus: Center of the Neo-Church’s Controlled Opposition
The statistic that the United States accounts for 24 of 34 permissions (70%) is not a sign of American Catholic vitality. It is the demographic signature of the controlled opposition. The U.S. is the financial engine of the conciliar sect, the home of the “conservative” Catholic media (EWTN, NCR, CNA) that manufactures the illusion of a “traditional revival” within the neo-church. The article itself is a product of this machine: EWTN News / ACI Prensa / CNA / National Catholic Register — all organs of the neo-church’s propaganda apparatus. They report the “steady permissions” as good news, normalizing the beggar’s bowl mentality.
This American dominance reflects the Masonic design for the neo-church: a “conservative” wing to absorb and neutralize resistance, a “liberal” wing to advance the revolution, and a “center” (the “pope”) to manage the dialectic. The 2023 spike to 55 permissions, followed by the drop to 34, mirrors the tactical relaxation and tightening of the screws. The “case-by-case” approach allows the Dicastery to reward compliance and punish dissent. It is spiritual blackmail.
Silence on the Novus Ordo: The Elephant in the Sacristy
The most damning aspect of the article is its total silence on the Novus Ordo Missae. It reports on permissions for the “Traditional Latin Mass” as if it were a distinct, optional “form” coexisting peacefully with the “ordinary form.” It never questions the validity, orthodoxy, or legitimacy of the Novus Ordo. It never mentions that the Novus Ordo was fabricated by the Freemason Bugnini (Annibale Bugnini, exposed as a Masonic agent), that it omits the propitiatory nature of the Sacrifice, the Real Presence, the priesthood, and the Communion of Saints — in short, that it is a Protestantized memorial service, invalid in form and intention, a sacrilege when celebrated as a Catholic Mass.
This silence is the gravest accusation. By treating the 1962 Missal as a mere “permission” issue, the article and the structures it represents concede the principle that the Novus Ordo is the legitimate norm. They accept the lex orandi of the antichurch. As Pius XI writes in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” When the true Mass is removed from the altar and replaced by the Novus Ordo, the foundation of the Church’s life is destroyed. The indult Mass is a Potemkin village erected to hide the ruins.
Continuity of Apostasy: Francis and Leo XIV as Twin Pillars of the Abomination
The article’s emphasis on the seamless transition — seven decrees under Francis, twenty-seven under Leo XIV — is presented as administrative normality. From the sedevacantist perspective, it is the apocalyptic continuity of the False Prophet. Francis (Jorge Bergoglio) was a manifest heretic, an apostate who worshipped Pachamama, signed the Abu Dhabi declaration (religious pluralism willed by God), and implemented Traditionis Custodes. Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) is his chosen successor, a man of the same modernist formation, the same curial machine, the same obedience to the Masonic agenda. The “continuity” is the unbroken reign of the Antichrist in the Vatican.
St. Pius X, in Lamentabili Sane Exitu and Pascendi Dominici Gregis, condemned Modernism as the “synthesis of all heresies.” The neo-church, from John XXIII to Leo XIV, is the institutionalization of Modernism. The “Dicastery for Divine Worship” is the Ministry of Liturgical Deformation. The Summarium Decretorum is the bulletin of the occupation forces. The thirty-four permissions are thirty-four chains.
Conclusion: Reject the Indult, Cleave to the Catacombs
The integral Catholic response to this report is not gratitude for “steady permissions,” but horror at the captivity. The true Church of Christ — Una, Sancta, Catholica, Apostolica — does not exist in the dioceses of Sacramento, Nashville, or Seattle as currently constituted. She exists where the Faith of the Fathers is preserved entire, where the Mass of St. Pius V is celebrated without permission, without compromise, without communion with the usurpers — by bishops and priests who retain valid orders and jurisdiction ab apostolis through the line of Archbishop Thuc, or by the faithful who keep the sensus fidei in the catacombs.
Non possumus (we cannot). We cannot accept the 1962 Missal as a concession. We cannot recognize the “bishops” who petition for it. We cannot acknowledge the “pope” who grants or denies it. The Kingship of Christ demands total separation from the abomination. As Pius XI commands in Quas Primas: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate.” The same applies to the sanctuary. The true Mass is the public veneration of Christ the King. It tolerates no rival, no regulator, no indult.
The thirty-four permissions are thirty-four signs of the times: the time of the Great Apostasy, the time of the Antichrist. Ecce venit — but not in the neo-church’s tabernacles. Venite, adoremus — in the true Mass, in the true Church, outside the camp, bearing His reproach (Heb. 13:13).
Source:
Vatican Latin Mass Permissions Steady Across Papal Transition (ncregister.com)
Date: 14.09.2026