The propaganda organ Vatican News reports on an interview granted by the layman Víctor Manuel Fernández — prefect of the false “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith” in the structures occupying the Vatican — on the occasion of the sixtieth anniversary of the conciliar declaration Nostra Aetate. The occasion is the publication of the document A Journey of Hope, a joint production of the pseudo-dicasteries for “Doctrine,” “Christian Unity,” and “Interreligious Dialogue.” In this interview, Fernández asserts with brazen audacity: “Every religion—and all religions—stands for peace. Never for war.” He anchors this blasphemy in Nostra Aetate §5, cites the antipope Leo XIV (Prevost) and his fictitious encyclical Magnifica humanitas, appeals to the “lover’s discourse” of Bergoglio’s Dilexit nos, and invokes the “civilization of love” of Montini (Paul VI). This text is not a pastoral reflection; it is the formal, magisterial ratification of the conciliar apostasy: the enthronement of indifferentism as the supreme law of the neo-church, the definitive burial of the Social Kingship of Christ, and the proclamation that the false gods of the nations are legitimate partners in the construction of a Masonic “universal fraternity” devoid of the Cross.
The Factual Lie: False Religions as Architects of Peace
The central factual claim of the interview — “Every religion—and all religions—stands for peace. Never for war” — is a lie so monstrous it could only be uttered in the precincts of the abomination of desolation. History and theology cry out against it. Islam, from its inception, spread by the sword (jihad), dividing the world into Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb; its “peace” is the peace of submission (islam) or the peace of the grave. The pagan religions of antiquity — Aztec, Canaanite, Roman — demanded human sacrifice and ritual violence as the very condition of cosmic order. Hinduism sanctifies the caste system and has fueled sectarian bloodshed. Buddhism has legitimized warrior monks and state violence from Japan to Sri Lanka. To declare that all religions stand for peace is to deny the objective reality of false worship, which ipso facto disorders the soul and society by directing latria to creatures rather than the Creator. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas, “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The “peace” of false religions is the peace of the cemetery; true peace — pax Christi in regno Christi — exists only where Christ reigns.
Furthermore, the document A Journey of Hope is presented as a fruit of the “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith.” This is a grotesque irony. The true Sacra Congregatio de Propaganda Fide (later the Holy Office) existed to condemn errors, not to dialogue with them as equals. Its prefects — from Cardinal Ottaviani to Cardinal Ratzinger (before his usurpation) — at least paid lip service to the Syllabus and Lamentabili Sane Exitu. Fernández, a manifest heretic who denies the necessity of the Church for salvation and promotes a “theology of the people” indistinguishable from Marxist liberationism, occupies that chair ipso facto vacated by heresy, in accordance with the teaching of St. Robert Bellarmine (De Romano Pontifice) and Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” His “doctrine” is the doctrine of the synagogue of Satan denounced by Pius IX in the Syllabus (Prop. 15-18): “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which… he shall consider true… Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation.” This is the condemned error of indifferentism, now canonized as the “journey of hope.”
The Linguistic Perversion: The Lexicon of the Antichurch
Analyze the vocabulary: “Journey,” “Hope,” “Dialogue,” “Fraternity,” “Civilization of Love,” “Encounter,” “Accompaniment,” “Identity,” “Openness,” “Proclamation without proselytism.” This is the Newspeak of the conciliar revolution. Words are emptied of their supernatural content and filled with naturalistic, Masonic humanitarianism.
- “Dialogue” no longer means the disputatio of the Apologists or the missionary mandate to “teach all nations… baptizing them” (Mt 28:19). It means a colloquium between equals where truth is negotiable. Fernández cites “Saint John Paul II” (Wojtyła) on “strongest sense of identity with greatest openness to dialogue.” This is the hermeneutic of contradiction: one cannot possess the fullness of Truth (Jn 14:6) and treat error as a “partner” with “beauty and harmony.”
- “Proclamation without proselytism” (citing Dilexit nos §§209-210) is the oxymoron of the neo-church. The “lover’s words” metaphor reduces the Kerygma — “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand” (Mt 4:17) — to a sentimental sharing of “experience” and “joy.” It eliminates the necessitas praecepti (necessity of precept) defined by the Council of Trent (Sess. VI, Can. 21, cited in Quas Primas n. 24): “Christ Jesus is given to men as Redeemer… but at the same time He is the Lawgiver, to whom men owe obedience.” The “lover” who does not “disturb,” “demand,” or “oblige” is not the Bridegroom of the Church, but a false christ accommodating the world.
- “Civilization of Love” (Montini, adopted by Prevost) replaces the Civitas Dei. It is a purely horizontal project: “fraternity, justice, respect” among men, with God reduced to a vague “Father of all” (Nostra Aetate §5) who cares not whether He is worshipped as Trinitarian Unity or as Allah, Brahman, or the Great Architect. This is the naturalism condemned by Pius IX (Syllabus, Props. 3, 55, 77-79) and Leo XIII (Humanum Genus).
Striking is the total silence on the supernatural order. No mention of: Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus; the necessity of Baptism of water (Jn 3:5); the reality of Hell; the Final Judgment; the Immaculate Conception; the Papacy; the Most Holy Sacrifice; the Kingship of Christ over all nations (Quas Primas). The vocabulary is exclusively sociological, psychological, and political. This silence is the gravissima accusatio: it proves the speakers have lost the Faith.
The Theological Bankruptcy: Indifferentism Elevated to Pseudo-Magisterium
The interview is a compendium of condemned propositions. Let us confront them with the immutable Magisterium.
1. The Denial of the Unicity and Necessity of the Church
Fernández states the Church “actively commits itself to proclaiming faith in the Risen Christ… so that a future of peace… may dawn.” But he simultaneously validates the viae salutis in false religions: “Every religion… stands for peace.” If all religions lead to peace (salvation), the Church is superfluous. This is Proposition 16 of the Syllabus (Damnatio “Multiplices inter”): “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation.” It is Proposition 17: “Good hope at least is to be entertained of the eternal salvation of all those who are not at all in the true Church of Christ.” It is the very definition of Modernism condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 22, 58, 65): “The dogmas which the Church proposes as revealed are not truths of divine origin but are a certain interpretation of religious facts… Truth changes with man… Contemporary Catholicism cannot be reconciled with true knowledge without transforming it into a certain dogmaless Christianity, that is, into a broad and liberal Protestantism.”
Pius XI in Quas Primas destroys this foundation: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ… Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ.” The “authority of Jesus Christ” is not exercised through “dialogue” with Baal, but through the potestas legislativa, iudicialis, executiva of His one, true Church. The “project of a civilization of love” is the Tower of Babel rebuilt by apostate prelates.
2. The “Nostra Aetate” Heresy: God as “Father of All” Apart from Christ
The interview quotes Nostra Aetate §5: “We cannot truly call on God, the Father of all, if we refuse to treat in a brotherly way any man… The Church reproves… any discrimination… because of their religion.” This text ambiguously suggests a universal divine fatherhood in re (in reality) apart from supernatural adoption in Christ (Gal 4:5; Eph 1:5). It confuses the imago Dei (natural) with filiatio adoptiva (supernatural). St. Pius X in Lamentabili (Prop. 20, 21) condemns the Modernist error: “Revelation was merely man’s self-awareness of his relationship to God… The dogmas… are not truths of divine origin but are a certain interpretation of religious facts.” By making “religion” a generic human value, Nostra Aetate destroys the necessitas medii (necessity of the means) — the Church and the Sacraments. Fernández’s citation of this text as a “guideline of utmost importance” confirms the conciliar sect has made the condemned error of liberalism/indifferentism its lex credendi.
3. The False Papacy and the Usurpation of Authority
Fernández cites “Pope Leo XIV” (Prevost), “Pope Francis” (Bergoglio), “Saint Paul VI” (Montini), “Saint John Paul II” (Wojtyła). None of these men are Popes. By the Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio of Paul IV (incorporated into the 1917 Code, cited 19 times in marginal notes), “if at any time it shall appear that any… Roman Pontiff… prior to his promotion… has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” The line of usurpers beginning with Roncalli (John XXIII) has publicly defected from the Faith by promulgating Vatican II (heretical on religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality), the New Mass (invalid form/sacrilege), and the new Code (1983). They are manifest heretics, therefore ipso facto deprived of jurisdiction (Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice 2:30; Wernz-Vidal, Ius Canonicum). Fernández, as a collaborator of the usurper, shares in the crimen laesae majestatis Divinae. His “Dicastery” is a bureau of the paramasonic structure.
The Symptomatic Level: The Masonic Blueprint Realized
This interview is not an anomaly; it is the modus operandi of the conciliar revolution reaching its logical terminus. The Syllabus (Prop. 55) condemned: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” The neo-church has not separated; it has capitulated. It has handed the temporal order over to the “civilization of love” — the Masonic Universal Republic where all cults are equal before the law of the State, and the Church is reduced to an NGO for “fraternity.”
The reference to the “Miracle of the Sun” at Fatima in the context of the provided documents (though not in the article) is instructive: the same “signs and lying wonders” (2 Thess 2:9) used to credential the Fatima narrative (the “consecration of Russia” psy-op) are now used to credential the “synodal journey.” The “Journey of Hope” is the Stage 3 of the disinformation strategy described in the False Fatima document: “Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” The “Third Secret” — the apostasy of Rome — is concealed by the very men (Fernández, Prevost, Bergoglio) who are its living fulfillment. The “ecumenical reinterpretation” is exactly what we see: Nostra Aetate transformed from a condemned novelty into the “Magna Carta” of the antichurch.
The “Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue” is the institutionalization of the parliament of religions condemned by Pius XI in Mortalium Animos (1928): “The Apostolic See cannot take part in their assemblies, nor is it anyway lawful for Catholics either to support or to work for such enterprises; for if they do so they will be giving countenance to a false Christianity, quite alien to the one Church of Christ.” Fernández’s interview proves the conciliar sect has formally apostatized from Mortalium Animos, from Quas Primas, from the Syllabus, from Lamentabili, from Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, from the Council of Trent, from Vatican I, and from the Gospel itself.
Conclusion: The Abomination Standing Where It Ought Not
The article from Vatican News is a bulletin from the synagogue of Satan (Apoc 2:9; 3:9) occupying the Vatican. “Cardinal” Fernández, the “Prefect” of the destroyed Holy Office, stands as the herald of the Mystery of Iniquity (2 Thess 2:7). His message — “All religions stand for peace” — is the credo of the Antichrist: a universal, naturalistic, pacifist religion where Christ is dethroned, the Cross is obscured, and the salvation of souls is sacrificed on the altar of “fraternity.”
True Catholics — the Ecclesia militans adhering to the immutable Tradition, the Mass of all ages, the true Sacraments, and the Sede Vacante — must reject this document in toto. We do not “dialogue” with the architects of the abomination; we anathematize their errors. We do not seek a “civilization of love” built on sand; we labor for the Restoration of All Things in Christ (Instaurare omnia in Christo), the Social Kingship of Christ the King, and the conversion of all nations to the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation. Non possumus.
Source:
Cardinal Fernández: All religions stand for peace (vaticannews.va)
Date: 16.09.2026